Blue Ribbon
Pabst Brewing Company in San Antonio, Texas, United States 🇺🇸
Lager - Pale Regular|
Score
4.03
|
|
This is the original Pabst Blue Ribbon Beer. Nature's choicest products provide its prized flavor. Only the finest of hops and grains are used. Selected as America's Best in 1893.
Sign up to add a tick or review
5.3/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 4
Flavor 6
Texture 4
Overall 5
Can. Pours pale yellow with foamy off-white head, malt aroma, lightly sweet slightly yeasty taste, thin body, abrupt finish. Well, I had to go and try it after reading about in so many paperbacks, though I must admit that it’s not too bad.
Tried
from Can
on 09 May 2017
at 14:03
4.5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 4
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 4
473ml can. Pours clear gold with a medium-sized white head. Aroma is light malt, cooked vegetables. Taste is grain, corn, pale malt. Reminds me of the sorts of beers that are prevalent in Vietnam. It's drinkable, but there's nothing else it. No idea why MPK decided to import this to Russia.... most local macros (including their own) have more taste.
Tried
from Can
on 11 Apr 2017
at 15:18
4.1/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Can. Smells and tastes of fizzy nothing. Clean. No hops. No beer. Thirst quenching. The latter is the only advantage.
Tried
from Can
on 10 Apr 2017
at 05:57
3.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 4
47,3cl can from some border shop in Latvia. Pours clear pale golden without much head to speak of. Mild grainy aroma with notes of cooked vegetables and hints of fruits. Sweet, grainy vegetable water, but still drinkable, just not too much point of it.
Tried
from Can
on 19 Mar 2017
at 13:48
4.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 4.5
Bottle at Lone Wolf; clear yellow pour with a creamy white head, aroma had lager malty action, taste had corn, skunky malt, not fucken bad.
Tried
from Bottle
on 10 Feb 2017
at 09:49
2.8/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 6
Overall 2
12oz can. Clear and golden with virtually no head. Aroma is funky chemicals. Flavour is sweet corn syrup. Not good in any way.
Tried
from Can
on 28 Jan 2017
at 15:45
3.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Standard pale lagers came into being in the U.S. in the second half of the 19th century as a result of the entrepreneurial efforts of German immigrants, who had quickly picked up on this originally Czech beer style - thus being co-responsible for the rapid spread of the style throughout the world; this is one of those originals, a contemporary of Budweiser, Schlitz and others. May or may not have won an award in Chicago in 1893 - historical documentation seems to fall short - but whatever the case, it grew to huge popularity in the 20th century and, due to takeovers and clever marketing, remained a staple of industrial American brewing till this very day. Loose and bubbly, off-white head, quickly dissolving in the middle but well-retaining on the edges albeit thinly so; cristal clear pale yellow golden robe with hardly any visible fizz, looking as stereotypical as it gets for the style. Aroma of sweaty grains, industrial soap, cat pee, melting rubber (quite sharply sulfuric at first but fading after a while), the overcooked odour of pasteurization, glue, wet rice paper, margarine, corn flour, plastic - nothing very natural, so to speak. Neutral onset as can be expected, sweetish corn and sharper grains, bit papery in the middle, cereally and a tad margarine-like (as in: buttery but in a very industrial manner), with carbonation that remains on the soft side for this style. Both plastic-like and - to a somewhat lesser extent - metallic flavors are added in the middle, but the corn flour factor actually manages to become a little bit bready and doughy in the finish, which is probably the only redeeming factor here; otherwise this beer goes down in a neutral, metallic and totally bland way, watery even due to the total lack of hops. Your average American adjunct lager, with a little more body (or in fact a little more ’corn creaminess’) than that mournfully thin MGD or even Bud, so in this respect not the worst weapon of choice for those who have no other intention than to drink gallons of the least offensive - and cheapest - alcoholic drink they can find, though the aroma remained downright offensive to me. This beer seems to have a kind of cult following in much the same way as Heineken has in the Netherlands or Jupiler in Belgium - clearly the result of clever marketing. With all due respects for the respectable age of this brand, this is very obviously one of those beers the craft breweries acted against in the late 20th century - so in a sense, we owe the current beer revolution, sweeping the whole civilized world in a way I could never have foreseen when I started taking beer seriously, to bland industrial rubbish like this. Glad I got the chance to study it this closely as it is only very scarcely available in Europe, big thanks Ster for bringing me this bottle (bottled in the Milwaukee plant, one of six plants that make it) all the way from America!
Tried
from Draft
on 20 Jan 2017
at 17:36
4.5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
Keg at the Guildford arms. Pours clear golden, nose is grainy, floral, lemon, taste is similar, grassy.
Tried
on 19 Jan 2017
at 09:39
7/10
Tried
on 22 Oct 2016
at 10:20
1.5/10
Tried
from Can
on 19 Oct 2016
at 20:21