Mulgi Pruulikoda Tulihänd

Tulihänd

 

Mulgi Pruulikoda in Kõvaküla, Viljandi County, Estonia 🇪🇪

  Smoked / Rauchbier Regular
Score
5.17
ABV: 4.9% IBU: - Ticks: 6
Sign up to add a tick or review

Join Us


     Show


2.7
Appearance - 3 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 3 | Overall - 11

Õlle on selline jook, et iga uus kord kui klaasi või pudeli suule tõstad, siis leiad midagi uut, sõltuvalt tuhandest-miljonist pisiasjast, mis hetke olukorda mõjutavad. Seega piirdun iga õlle juures selle tekstiga.

Tried on 30 Jun 2020 at 09:51


5.6
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5.5

(Bottle, 0.33 l - batch 16-03 - BB 30.09.17, at Northmen Kohvik, Viljandi, 20170731) The beer poured dark brown and nearly clear. Its head was medium sized and white. Aroma had caramel and mildly smoke. Palate was medium bodied with medium carbonation. Flavours were caramel, grass, smoke and bitterness. Aftertaste was malty and bitter. Aroma was too mild but the taste had nice sweet and smoky notes.

Tried from Bottle on 31 Jul 2017 at 04:10


4

Tried from Bottle on 19 Jun 2017 at 11:47


4.8
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5

33cl bottle from Väike Roosa Õllepood, Kristiine. Pours slightly hazy chestnut coloured with a modest off-white head. Malty and somewhat caramelly aroma, not much smoke here. Medium sweet with slightly messy malty flavours and feels more like homebrew. It’s drinkable, but hardly impressive or memorable.

Tried from Bottle on 21 Dec 2016 at 14:32


4.8
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 4

Pours mahogany, reddish copper. Again, not much foam - nor carbonation. Nose has some caramel, most aromas covered with some smoke - which is probably a good thing because it could hide some possible flaws this beer has. Taste, however, cannot hide everything. Flavour has still some smoke, nice and not overpowering. Unfortunately everything else is quite lame - watery and slightly carboard’y malt forward taste, very light body. Drinks easy but well, that’s because it’s watery. Can finish this but well, quite shitty beer for one of the first releases from a new brewery.

Tried from Can on 19 Dec 2016 at 14:16


4.5
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 3

Bottle, batch 16-03 (shared by kairi, thanks). Pours brownish. Aroma is smoke, sweetness, malt. Flavor is sweet and bitter, smoke, sausages, some dirtyness, paper. Finish is also dirty. Body is watery. Overall: still not good, dirty with obvious brewing flaws.

Tried from Bottle on 24 Nov 2016 at 14:09