United Breweries Group Taj Mahal

Taj Mahal

 

United Breweries Group in Dharuhera, Haryana, India 🇮🇳

  Lager - Premium Regular
Score
4.23
ABV: 4.5% IBU: - Ticks: 84
Sign up to add a tick or review

Join Us


     Show


3/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 2 Flavor 2 Texture 4 Overall 3
Bottled. Maybe it deserves a 2 for the appearance, because it poured clear, pale golden with a minimal white head, but I somehow ended up with a 3. Aroma and flavor on the other hand didn’t get more than 2. The aroma is weak and citrusy, almost like a german radler. The flavor starts with hops and grains, then the radler-like feeling that were in the aroma comes through. Thin and watery mouthfeel and a citrusy finish with some hops and grains. I really don’t see the point with this beer. (070103)
Tried from Bottle on 29 Jan 2007 at 13:22

3.5/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 3 Flavor 4 Texture 4 Overall 3
Pale lager flavor, akin to most macro brews. Watery, and frankly nothing at all to call home about.
Tried on 06 Nov 2006 at 21:21

4.9/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 5 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 4.5
Biggish coarse white head quickly shrinks. Pale yellow body with a little carbonation. Clean hoppy aroma with notes of apple. Taste is clean and crisp with sharp, well-defined hop notes. Watery aftertaste with notes of cardboard. Notes of chalk and some acidity. It’s decent, the hops are quite nice, but I could do without the cardboard, and a little more taste would be nice. (0.33l bottle.)
Tried from Bottle on 17 Oct 2006 at 11:09

1.9/10 Appearance 2 Aroma 2 Flavor 2 Texture 2 Overall 1.5
570ml bottle. Very pale body, close to water. Tick, small bubbled white head. Aroma is a bit perfumed and very weak. Flavor is also dominated by perfume, not much – but there is not so much else to taste here. As always this is easy drinkable in accompaniment with a really hot curry dish, but so is also water.
Tried from Bottle on 11 Oct 2006 at 15:37

2.5/10 Appearance 2 Aroma 3 Flavor 2 Texture 4 Overall 2
Slightly hazy pale yellow color with a thin frothy white head. Aroma of corn and grain. Grainy flavor, some corn. --- Beer merged from original tick of Taj Mahal Premium Lager on 13 Jul 2022 at 20:08 - Score: 3. Original review text: Clear pale straw body small fizzy white head. Dry cardboard aroma. Grainy cardboard flavor. Light body moderate carbonation. 3/2/3/2/7 1.7
Tried on 25 Jul 2006 at 18:35

3.6/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 3 Flavor 3 Texture 4 Overall 3.5
22 oz bottle - "Slow brewed for the connoisseur" the bottle declares. They do mean beer connoisseur, right? I can’t tell. It’s just another disappointing pale lager. It doesn’t have a good sized head that sticks around awhile and leaves some lacing. There’s a light malt aroma. The flavor is a watered down malt with corn notes like far too many pale lagers. There’s a little hops too. The palate is thin and bubbly. The finish is dry and crisp. It’s slightly better than a Bud, but not worth paying for an import. I want my three bucks back.
Tried from Bottle on 14 May 2006 at 23:14

4/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 2 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 3
Pour is a very yellow with a white head Aroma is hard to find. Flavor is bland as lager can be. nothing going on here
Tried from Can on 04 Nov 2005 at 22:03

3.9/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 4 Flavor 4 Texture 4 Overall 3.5
Not much to taste here. Pale yellow with rapidly disappearing white head and moderate lacing. Hints of corn, grain and a slight sweetness. Some hop bitterness as it warms. Preferred it cold.
Tried on 14 Aug 2005 at 19:46

2.9/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 4 Flavor 2 Texture 2 Overall 2.5
Bottle. Grassand malt aroma. Pale yellow with little head. Watery sour malt flavor - little body. Very bland - would be acceptable with a hot curry.
Tried from Bottle on 12 Aug 2005 at 20:19

4.4/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 4 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 4.5
This one poured a light yellow with next to no head. Even after a rough pour. Doughy Yeast is first to the nose. Cheesy earth notes. Initial taste had a smoky flavour to it. Hickory to be exact. With slight cheesy flavours. Finish was watery, with the palate the same other than the light smoke flavour. OK I guess...
Tried on 05 Apr 2004 at 02:21