Tuborg LITE
Tuborg in Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark 🇩🇰
Lager - Pale Regular|
Score
3.43
|
|
Sign up to add a tick or review
3.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
33 cL can. Pours clear yellow with a white head. Light malty and bitterhops aroma. Light cereal note. Flavour is dry hoppy with a classic Tuborg touch following, yet that seems slight vague compared to the standard brew. Dry to slight watery finish. Seriously - do some exercise instead of drinking light beer.
Tried
from Can
on 13 Apr 2008
at 11:33
3/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 3
Can. Frothy white good mostly deminsihng head. Harsh malty bready aroma and flavor. Light bitter ugly flavor. very watery palate. Slighty worse than Carlsberg LITE.
Tried
from Can
on 01 Apr 2008
at 10:00
3/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 3
Can. Courtesy of Yngwie. Frothy white fair mostly deminishng head. Yellow colour. Light malty and hoppy aroma, bad bready notes. Light bitter ugly flavor. Very week thank god. Very watery palate. A rating and not more.
Tried
from Can
on 08 Mar 2008
at 11:41
3.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3
Bottle. Nice head with medium duration. Color is pale golden. Aroma and taste are sweet bready malt and hops.
Tried
from Bottle
on 07 Mar 2008
at 16:29
2.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 1.5
The paradox with this lite-product is that in spite of its less sugar and calories content, it tastes very sweet. The flavour is little more than sweet water mixed with alcohol. Sweet fruity hints to the nose. Clear golden body. Very bland and dull (two 500ml cans at a birthday party in Tromsø 01.02.2008).
Tried
from Can
on 02 Feb 2008
at 06:16
4.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 4
(Can 50 cl) Courtesy of yngwie. Clear, pale, pilsener golden with a small, white head. Lightly malty aroma. Very thin and watery body. Rather clean and lightly sweet malt feel with basically no bitterness. Drinkable and harmless - and quite close to American lites. 231007
Tried
from Can
on 28 Oct 2007
at 17:38
2.1/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
Can. Yellow colour with a white. Nearly no aroma and flavour. Flavour is malt and weak hop. Thin.
Tried
from Can
on 11 Mar 2007
at 01:51
2.4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 2.5
On can 0,5l. Bright golden - yellowish coloured. A fluffy head that lasted for a couple of minutes. Some malt in the aroma. A watery, sweet malty flavor and aftertaste. No bitterness. Utterly boring.
Tried
from Can
on 08 Mar 2007
at 15:10
3.1/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
Can. Clear, well-sparkling, a bit pale golden beer with a white head. Booring aroma, a bit bready, with a weak hoppyness. Watery on the palate, with some hops, both in the start and finish, but not much else. There is some bready notes as well, but very weak. I really can’t understand there’s a market for this. It certainly doesn’t taste like real beer, but I don’t find it foul. Bready aroma, hoppy in the mouth, but weak all the way. (070226)
Tried
from Can
on 26 Feb 2007
at 14:25
1.5/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1
500 ml can. Pale, pale, really pale body with a white disappearing head. Aroma ? Flavor is pretty much the same as the aroma – gone (maybe together with the calories). Yes, I really things Ringnes will take the new and growing beer marked with storm this time! ........................................... Tasted again 16/2-2008. The flavor is to me quite artificial, best describes as dishwashing soap. I could not finish the can, actually not even the small glass I had. This beer is not only extremely boring, it’s totally undrinkable.
Tried
from Can
on 18 Feb 2007
at 14:54