3.5

Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 2

bottled. This makes michelob taste good,and michelob is awful. Yeah, it’s that bad.....

1.9

Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 1 | Flavor - 1 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 0.5

Bottle. Gold color, decent head. Grainy, a little sweet flavor. Aroma, also grains, watery.

3.8

Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 3

Golden with a medium sized white head. Tangy and slightly grainy with a hint of perfume. Medium finish and body.

3.1

Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 2.5

3.4

Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 2.5

From old tasting notes. Pale yellow gold color. Creamy white head. Fragrant chalky malt aroma. Light grainy malt flavor upfront. Highly carbonated. Slightly sour midtaste. Light hop finish with a brief dry aftertaste. Flavorful for a light beer.

4.1

Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 3.5

What can a guy say about Michelob Light? It’s a light yellow colored, white foam capped, pale lager that has been mass produced for 40 years. They were big on marketing to golf when I worked in business, probably still are. I’ve had a few more of these over the years than I care to admit. It’s easy drinking and non-offensive, on par with most of the macros, maybe a little better than most.

2.3

Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 2 | Flavor - 1 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 2

Backlog. Lighter version of the original. Too sweet and watery. Cardboard and light corn. No thanks.

1.8

Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 1 | Flavor - 1 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 1

Another beer of my youth. For some reason we felt that Michelob was a classier beer than most of the other lagers around, I’m not sure why. We must’ve been victims of advertising.