Tandem
Pike Brewing Company in Seattle, Washington, United States 🇺🇸
Belgian Style - Dubbel Regular|
Score
6.77
|
|
Sign up to add a tick or review
6.8/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 7
Reddish brown,lasting beige head.Sweet/salty nose.Big sweet dark malt profile, lightly roasted, decently hopped. Quite nice. Light alcohol heat
Tried
on 12 Mar 2007
at 19:06
4.9/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 4.5
Draught pint at Redbones on 11/30/06
Drab, olive-brown with dark, stained oak and beige tones throughout. Off-white/beige head is small but fairly stable, providing light lacing. Medium to medium-low clarity.
Not much aroma, very dull and slightly metallic maybe? Sourish coffee with some light cocoa notes and bits of brown bread. Nuttiness trails off and all is soon overtaken by a leafy, green hoppiness. Lightly floral and spicy, not very bitter or strong. Nothing very distinctive here and in fact it smells rather damp and musty.
The flavor seems to hint more at the problem. Either this is just a very poorly made beer (doubtful) or there is something wrong with the batch. Peanuts, coffee grinds and a tannic malt quality are stretched way too lean across a lightly watery body. No malt sweetness or suppleness, with rather bitter/bland hops as an afterthought. Vegetal qualities emerge quickly, on the finish, pointing at DMS or some other culprit. It never regains any real good qualities. Mossy/moldy, musty, vegetal, thin and lightly bready. Carbonation is moderate, wet, washed out texture.
Drab, olive-brown with dark, stained oak and beige tones throughout. Off-white/beige head is small but fairly stable, providing light lacing. Medium to medium-low clarity.
Not much aroma, very dull and slightly metallic maybe? Sourish coffee with some light cocoa notes and bits of brown bread. Nuttiness trails off and all is soon overtaken by a leafy, green hoppiness. Lightly floral and spicy, not very bitter or strong. Nothing very distinctive here and in fact it smells rather damp and musty.
The flavor seems to hint more at the problem. Either this is just a very poorly made beer (doubtful) or there is something wrong with the batch. Peanuts, coffee grinds and a tannic malt quality are stretched way too lean across a lightly watery body. No malt sweetness or suppleness, with rather bitter/bland hops as an afterthought. Vegetal qualities emerge quickly, on the finish, pointing at DMS or some other culprit. It never regains any real good qualities. Mossy/moldy, musty, vegetal, thin and lightly bready. Carbonation is moderate, wet, washed out texture.
Tried
on 11 Jan 2007
at 07:56
6.9/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 7.5
On Tap At Pike Pub & Brewery Seattle. pours out a hazy brown with a nice head. Has a nice sweet arom and some fruit notes as well.
Tried
from Draft
on 15 Sep 2006
at 14:55
7.8/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 8
Texture 8
Overall 8
Dark amber colour. Hazy. Fairly chocolatey, lightly toasty aroma. Full flavour with rich toast and chocolate in the complex malty body. Slight bitterness underpins it perfectly. Big body. Unique, very flavourful, a pint to come back to more than once.
Tried
on 11 Sep 2006
at 16:00
7/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 8
Overall 7
Draught Dark chestnut brown, nearly no head. Molasses, brown malts, some mineral quality. Smoked malts very obvious in the taste, way drier than the nose suggested. Very good attenuation. Dry, and seen the attenuation, rather light body. This is a special one. I appreciate its taste, as the ingredients’ bill might suggest otherwise.
Tried
on 20 Apr 2006
at 06:19
7.5/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 8
Texture 6
Overall 8
Draft. Dark reddish brown beer with a nice beige head. Malty aroma. Malty/roaty flavors with a slight smokiness and just enough hops. Very good.
Tried
from Draft
on 22 Sep 2005
at 23:08