Filter & sort
Show
5.6/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 4 Overall 5.5
On tap at Jackknife, pours an opaque cloudy peachy yellow with a small whit head. Aroma is a bit chalky, with dank hops, orange zest, and chalk. Flavour is full of orange zest, some murky earthy notes, and citrus hops. A bit too chalk and doesn't make up for it.
Tried from Draft on 29 Jul 2021 at 06:22

7.2/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 7
On tap at Jackknife, pours a hazy bright golden orange with a small white head. Aroma brings out soft wheaty notes, with some bugs, and soft bready malt. Flavour is buggy, with a nice oak character, rustic saison yeast, and a bit of metallic character. Nice wild yeast character, with an oaky finish. No notice of the rhubarb. Good stuff.
Tried from Draft on 29 Jul 2021 at 06:21

7.6/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 9 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 7.5
Nice deep ruby copper body and modest foam. A very sweet malt aroma, close to red wine, excellent and so very hard to find. Taste is smooth caramel with soft fruity hop notes that lean toward red wine; lingering sugar, but smooth and not overbearing. They should teach this to kids in brewing school as a standard.
Tried on 24 Jul 2021 at 23:00

6.8/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 7 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 7
Dark amber and a bit hazy. Some bitterness, and lots of red wine sweetness with this. Don't get pomegranate specifically but it's enjoyable.
Tried on 09 Jul 2021 at 16:55

5/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 5
Hazy and pale. It's got some butter on it, a bit of pale malt, and some bitterness. But the butter. Yeah.
Tried on 09 Jul 2021 at 16:54

7.4/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 7.5
Red-brown colour. Nice subtle cherry note, with a vinous character and just hints of tartness. Solid.
Tried on 09 Jul 2021 at 16:53

5.1/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 6 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 5.5
Hazy tan. Thin head. Buttery and bitter. I mean the leafy hops are nice and all but obviously the diacetyl has no business being there. Now, I am aware that I tested a 4 out of 5 on the diacetyl sensitivity scale, so even among people who know what diacetyl is, most wouldn't find it in this beer. But that's why you always need to hire someone who's a 5 out of 5 to do your QA.
Tried on 24 May 2021 at 18:22

7.6/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 8 Texture 8 Overall 7.5
Hazy blonde. Nice buggy character. Refreshing wheat. A little vinous - actually the description doesn't indicate barrel time but lots of wine barrels kicking around this brewery so it wouldn't surprise me. Yeah, this hits the balance really well. Some of the potential I've seen in the barrel stuff is starting to find its sea legs now. Probably the best beer I've had here to date.
Tried on 17 May 2021 at 05:07

5.8/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 6
Murky, dullish amber. Thin head. Light yeast, bretty, and there's light fruitiness, too, on the nose. A bit vinous. Tastes better than it looks. Kind of yeasty, but yeah, one of those beers where the idea is awesome, execution just sort of okay.
Tried on 14 May 2021 at 03:58

6.2/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 6 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 7
Hazy and sort of dull. A touch lighter colour than Lotan's Maw, which otherwise looks similar. No head. Tart. Nice wheaty taste, refreshing, has some good bugs in there. I can dig this.
Tried from Can on 14 May 2021 at 03:53