Triple Bock
Samuel Adams in Boston, Massachusetts, United States 🇺🇸
Strong Ale - American Rotating Out of Production|
Score
6.60
|
|
Triple Bock is complex, elegant, and has the depth and complexity of a fine cognac, vintage port or an old sherry. Non-carbonated, ruby-black, and very special, Triple Bock should be sipped from a small snifter in a two-ounce serving.
This is a beer to savor, and sip slowly. Triple Bock has a brandy-like warmth and a complex melange of fruity, woody, and toffee-like flavors. Let the aroma fill your mouth and nose with rich malt and fruit overtones. Savor and appreciate its enormous character.
Serve Triple Bock as you would a fine sherry, at room temperature, in a small snifter. One bottle generously serves two or three. Recork and store standing up. Once poured into a small glass, the layers of aroma and flavor will continue to evolve as the deep ruby brew warms in the hand. There have been only three vintages produced: 1994, 1995 and 1997.
This is a beer to savor, and sip slowly. Triple Bock has a brandy-like warmth and a complex melange of fruity, woody, and toffee-like flavors. Let the aroma fill your mouth and nose with rich malt and fruit overtones. Savor and appreciate its enormous character.
Serve Triple Bock as you would a fine sherry, at room temperature, in a small snifter. One bottle generously serves two or three. Recork and store standing up. Once poured into a small glass, the layers of aroma and flavor will continue to evolve as the deep ruby brew warms in the hand. There have been only three vintages produced: 1994, 1995 and 1997.
Sign up to add a tick or review
4.3/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 6
Overall 4
Bottle. Consumed a very long time ago. Pours black. No head. Nose/taste of hot alcohol, chocolate, rye bread, boiled coffee beans and thick carmelized toffee. Harsh mouth feel. Big alcohol burn.
Tried
from Bottle
on 25 Jun 2011
at 20:59
8.6/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 8
Flavor 9
Texture 8
Overall 9.5
Aroma:lakrids kakao vanilje blomme sveske rosin soya tømmer Ud.:kaffesort uklar MEGET BUNDFALD(grød) Skum:ingen Efter smag:sød meget bitter moderat Krop:medium til fuld For.:sirup Brus:flad f2cl 19/11-10 @F1
Tried
on 16 Jan 2011
at 05:09
6.9/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 8
Overall 6.5
Bottle bought in Fukushima prefecture Japan. I saw this in a liquor shop near the highway and had to buy it. A deep ruby black coloured pour. A boozy port like aroma. Everything about this beer is complex in a big way, so much going on. It really is a sipper at 18%. Tastes sweet, port, caramel, dark fruit, malt, hint of coffee, distinct prune taste. A really unique barley wine. Worth experiencing once.
Tried
from Bottle
on 13 Aug 2010
at 14:53
4.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 6
Texture 4
Overall 3
I don’t particularly like this beer, but I’m not going to slam it. It is not nearly as bad as some strong older beers that I’ve had. You can taste the different components, and they have some good qualities. Whether the resulting combination has diminished from age, I have no idea, not having tried the beer earlier than now, but I just don’t really like it at this time. It’s very strong, utterly flat and viscous as hell. These qualities make it hard for me to enjoy because they seem to accentuate the past vintage faults, or at least what I imagine those faults to be. This beer does seem to be an interesting point in the history of craft beer.
Tried
from Can
on 07 Apr 2010
at 23:38
7.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 8
Flavor 8
Texture 8
Overall 9
Blue bottle. 1997 vintage, I suppose. Blackish amber color with not head. Aroma like a raisin wine or Vin Santo. Raisins and other dried fruits, port; sweet with a fruity, sour tinge. Flavor is the same, and nicely balanced by chocolate. I tasted this blind, and did not dream it could be beer. Extreme flavors are very well integrated by age. Note: the first time I had this, it was repugnant and undrinkable. Basically it was a mixture of soy and Worcestershire sauce. Bottle to bottle differences surely explain much of the debate concerning this beer.
Tried
from Bottle
on 27 Mar 2010
at 17:35
7.9/10
—
Appearance 10
Aroma 6
Flavor 9
Texture 6
Overall 8.5
1997 vintage bottle. Poured into two separate glasses. Aroma is really like a fine cognac, fine alcohol aromas permeate the air as I smelled the just-poured beer. I acquired 3 bottles and was looking forward to it - until I read some of the recent reviews. However, I think that some of the bottles were likely mishandled in some way - causing the poor experience since the bottle I had was phenomenal. The beer had some very basic notes of soy sauce and salt - but so little that it did not detract from the beer as so many extremely aged beers have the unfortunate mishap of being. The aroma was initially terrible smelling, but the flavor was great. The beer has mellowed quite a bit, so much so that it would have been wonderful to have been able to have a bottle when it was first sold. However, I’ll take this beer the way it is now.
Tried
from Bottle
on 12 Sep 2009
at 17:47
6.9/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 6.5
Bottle (1997 vintage... special thanks to Cletus.) Pours a dark and viscous brown with no carbonation... none, but thick and almost oppressive aromas of soy sauce, molasses, prunes, light soy sauce, dark soy sauce, unsalted soy sauce and some soy sauce with MSG. Damn... that’s an aroma that sticks with you. It almost comes off as salty. As I look back in the bottle there is a pretty horrifying sludge on the bottom that growls at me. I like the bottle plenty, but I’m not sure if it will give it back to me. First sip... well... I bet the only time I had something anything like this was 15 years ago when I last tried it. With no palate refinement other than a taste for Bells beer, I remember thinking this was pretty gross. Now, with well over a thousand ratings, I still think this is borderline gross. Then again, it is strong and interesting. Almost like a moonshine and soy sauce mix. I can’t say I like it, but I can’t say I hate it. I can say that I won’t buy another at $7-10. This would be a heck of a lot better without the soy sauce. There is a lot of fruity goodness hiding, but it’s burried.
Tried
from Bottle
on 19 Aug 2009
at 22:56
3.5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 4
Bottle as shown. Pours a very dark brown with no head at all. The aroma is oak tobacco and soy sauce. Thick mouthfeel with a intense flavor of soy sauce and chocolate. The alcohol is so overpowering making it difficult to get down. I willl use the rest of this bottle as marinade for a steak i am grilling later today.
Tried
from Bottle
on 27 Jul 2009
at 00:46
5.2/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 4
bottle, 1997 vintage, pours pitch black, no head, lots of sludge. Aroma is funky soy and worchestshire sauce. Smells like a steak marinade. Flavor is sweet, very sweet malt and a soy/ginger finish. Unpleasant.
Tried
from Bottle
on 18 Jul 2009
at 13:54
7.9/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 8
Flavor 9
Texture 6
Overall 7.5
1997 bottle. Unclear dark orange brown. Heavy chocolate aroma, alcohol and some sweetness. Tastes of soy and chocolate. I tried another bottle about 6 months ago which must have been infected or badly stored, it was undrinkable, sour and strange while this bottle is interesting and sweet.
Tried
from Bottle
on 08 Mar 2009
at 18:27