3.9/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Tastes like water with a slightly dry finish................................
Tried
on 01 Jun 2002
at 06:42
3.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
Marginally better than Budweiser. And that tells the rest...................
Tried
on 27 Feb 2002
at 15:33
2.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2
I guess if you held a gun to my head and made me choose an American Lite, this would be it. I mean if Sam Adams stopped making theirs. I agree that this is a good chick beer.
Tried
from Can
on 14 Jan 2002
at 11:42
1.1/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
It's rocky mountain water all right.........................................
Tried
on 18 Dec 2000
at 15:35
3.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
............................................................................
Tried
on 25 Nov 2000
at 12:03
1.1/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
Its been a long time since I've tried it, but I still remember what is was like, and I don't think i want to spend good money on it again, just to give it a rating. So what was my reaction...? YUCK! Their slogan regarding no more bitter beer face is appropriate though, cuz this beer has so little flavor that its impossible to get a taste reaction at all. And whats so bad about bitter beer anyway? Give me a good ultra-hopped IPA anyday of this swill.
Tried
on 15 Jun 2000
at 22:46
3.9/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 6
Overall 2.5
A stronger malt presence than all other Coors products, but still lacking anything distinct. Somewhat bland but drinkable (and I mean drinkable in the sense that it doesn't taste bad).
Tried
on 15 Jun 2000
at 22:41
3.6/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 5.5
Another update, back in 2000 I wrote that this beer tasted salty to me and gave me a headache. I can distinctly remember the times I had it back then, and I do remember all of that. But it's all pretty weird. This ain't a good beer, but it do drank good. It's about as clean as these pale lagers get - just a touch of corn or cereal grain sweetness that is lightly off putting but mostly neutral.
Tried
from Can
on 03 May 2000
at 10:32
3.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4.5
So I'm rerating this beer, which was one of my earliest ratings on this site, written on its first day, April 26, 2000. I previously trashed it, gave it a 0.7 and said it was one of the worst beers I've ever had. Nearly 20 years later, I can't say I love this beer or anything ridiculous like that, but it most definitely isn't among the worst beers. I can name a hundred so called craft brews that I would drainpour, but I'll drink this. It's cleaner than most of the pale lagers, just a slight grainy/corn flavor. It has become my go to swill lager. Drink it in the stubbies
Tried
from Can
on 26 Apr 2000
at 15:04
Pitchers of the stuff watching John and Andy when this place was Salad Alley!
Tried
from Draft
on 10 Oct 1992
at 20:36