4.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 5
Texture 6
Overall 5.5
I am very surprised i have not rated this beer yet, it is an old time favorite from the days of my youth. my dad used to buy it allot when I was about 18-21 and we used to get it for free because of that. Has a good clean beer aroma, with a little of that corny smell in there but it is not offensive at all. This is from a 16 oz can that cost me 60 cents. Decent clean lager flavor with very little perceivable negative attributes. Not bad for a session beer, goes down easy on a hot summer day. No bitterness per se. Good friendly fun and easy to slug, not bad for a cheap beer. I think it still has some of that old stroh character that I remember way back then when it was a separate brewery. Finish is acceptable and gentleman~like. not bad, glad I finally bought a case, it’s been a long time! I guess strohs light is next, heheheh.
Tried
from Can
on 06 Jul 2008
at 13:45
2.8/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 3
pale american lager. another classic hillbilly brew...nothing worth describing
Tried
from Can
on 08 Feb 2008
at 12:37
2.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2
Thinner than regular Strohs. I knew someone who swore by this beer. No thanks. Certainly not the worst macro-ish mass produced beer out there, but it still comes up way short.
Tried
on 18 Sep 2007
at 18:02
4.1/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4.5
Not so bad. No offensive character. Some corn. Fairly light and refreshing, and it is more pleasant than Miller lite or Budweiser.
Tried
on 29 Aug 2007
at 01:08
2.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 1
Texture 4
Overall 2
Draught. Pale yellow pour with fast dissipating head. Aroma of citrus and maize. I wish I could rate the flavour lower, there was an indescribable unpleasant ’something’ in the flavour that put me off. Ordinary fast dissipating finish with a tiny bit of hoppiness.
Tried
on 17 Aug 2007
at 23:05
3/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2
Strohs. A extremely weak beverage to say the least. You pay for quality here, and not suprisingly there just isn’t any quality at all. Can adds interesting metallic taste (to say the least).
Tried
from Can
on 14 Aug 2007
at 00:39
3.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4.5
A beer that is not as bad as the other ones. In fact, it is ok. Drinkable at least. Unfortunately, it is far too expensive to ever buy again (at least where I am from). Yeah, so it is actually a beer and for that I give it a high five to the face.
Tried
on 12 Jan 2007
at 21:17
3.2/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 6
Overall 3
Sampled from a 12 oz can this beer poured the palest yellow color I have ever seen, with a huge soapy white head. The aroma is sour macro pale lager tang. There is a bit of corny sweetness on the nose. The flavor is dry and corny with a hint of pepper and a tangy finish. Bland and inoffensive.
Tried
from Can
on 05 Sep 2006
at 18:33
3.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
Canned. I haven’t seen this for a while in Chicago, so when a saw a six for $4 in Lafayette, IN, I thought I should grab it in case it’s about to go the way of Falstaff. I notice, though, the can says nothing about it being "fire brewed," and the pour looks it. A thin gold color only slightly less pisslike than a Miller. Can’t pick up much of a smell, not even the usual generic "beer" smell that some macros still put up. Thin head dissolves right away. My first impression was that there was just a touch of bitter to it right up front. Not a bad start, but there’s very little to back it up. Still more corn than malt to it. Overly fizzied, goes down like a 7up. A decent cheap lawnmower beer, at least.
Tried
from Can
on 21 Aug 2006
at 13:32
2/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 1
Served in a can at the tin can tavern in St. Louis. No real aroma and i drank it right out of the can. Flavor is grain and very watery. Nothing really redeaming but it did hit the spot on a very warm June evening. When you can get a beer for $1.50 at a bar you should not expect much.
Tried
from Can
on 16 Jun 2006
at 20:28