Subsidiaries
4.3/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 4
Am I the only one who thinks this is OK??? Despite the cow manure nose, the body is well balanced and mildly sour. Not unexpectedly a dry corny finish. Better than the Imperial IMO.
Tried
on 24 Dec 2003
at 01:30
4.6/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 2
Overall 5.5
Gold with white head. Highly carbonated.Stale beery nose, faint malt taste. Fizzy
Tried
on 10 Jan 2003
at 14:44
4.1/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4.5
Light grainy nose and palate. Not much to it, but drinkable.................
Tried
on 01 Jan 2003
at 15:52
1.4/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
Bottled in Monteverde. Pale yellow, coarse head. Aroma of an empty can with conserved peas. Sweetish, empty and metallic. Tastes like a used garbage can, and that is coincidencially also where I think this beer belongs.
Tried
from Bottle
on 28 Mar 2002
at 12:45
2.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Rather light, with a slight grainy note. It is probably one of the most well-made of the mainstream Central American lagers, and wouldn’t disappoint most beer drinkers. Though it is kind of flavourless for my money, you could do much worse.
Tried
from Can
on 26 Mar 2002
at 12:48