3.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 4
At one time this was one of the only Imports available in BC. Thankfully those days have passed.
Tried
on 14 Jan 2003
at 12:39
5.3/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 6
Texture 4
Overall 5
Blond, clear body, white fizzy head which diminishes quite fast. Dusty, yeasty aroma, quite flat. Bittery initial flavour, bitter-salty finish.
Tried
on 14 Jan 2003
at 11:02
4.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5
Bottled(500ml). -amber color, not so good aroma, nice big head, to sweet....
Tried
from Bottle
on 25 Dec 2002
at 06:48
4.9/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 4.5
Bottled(500ml). -for me tuborg is better then tuborg classic................
Tried
from Bottle
on 21 Dec 2002
at 06:45
1.3/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 1
Canned. An absolutely fascinating beer. One can only imagine what went through the minds of the managers when they created this, my favourite to take the #1 position as the worst beer on RateBeer. The aroma is papery and revoltingly unclean. There is so much adjunct in there, but what is it? Garbage and re-cycled peas fermented for 20 minutes? Finishes gassy and leaves a flavour in you mouth very similar to the what you get when you're having a stomach flu. However it lacks the infested burning rubber aroma of Stepan Razin Studencheskoye, so I'm kind and award it 0.6, which is extremely generous...
Tried
from Can
on 18 Dec 2002
at 05:34
4.9/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 4.5
(0,5 liter dark blue plastic bottle.) Brownish golden colour, moderate head. Aroma and flavour like an average pilsener with liqourice added - and that's what it actually is (the label states that liqourice is an ingredient). Compared to the best Norwegian \"klasse F\" Christmas beers, this is BAD (well, it's drinkable, but not much more).
Tried
from Bottle
on 09 Dec 2002
at 11:29
5.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 7
An amber beer with no head. The aroma is very faintly sweet. But the flavor is a lot better: it has a nice sweetness of a nice malt blend (caremel malt) with a little bitterness that lingers. A very nice beer for consumption in the time before christmas. As the years have passed I like it less and less. 10 years ago I loved it for the sweetness but now I don''t like too sweet beers and therefore is turning away from this beer. But it''s still a really good beer.
Tried
on 13 Nov 2002
at 14:52
2.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 1
Texture 6
Overall 1
A yellow beer with a small head. It has a sour aroma as if it has been brewed on brewing cereal - but it has not - so it must be the added flavor. The flavor is the same sour flavor as the aroma. The sourness removes the watery taste of other lowalcoholic beers - but I definatly don''t like it.
Tried
on 13 Nov 2002
at 10:24
3.4/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 4
Flavor 3
Texture 6
Overall 2.5
A golden beer with next to nothing head. It has a slight aroma of hops and a flat and watery taste that ends in a slight hoppiness. For a light beer it''s OK - but I go for a regular pilsener strength beer instead.
Tried
on 07 Nov 2002
at 13:36
3/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 4
Flavor 2
Texture 6
Overall 2
A very light yellow beer with a fast disappearing head. It has a fresh slightly hoppy aroma. And a watery flat metallic slight bitter taste.
Tried
on 08 Oct 2002
at 11:31