Mulgi Pruulikoda

Microbrewery in Kõvaküla, Viljandi County, Estonia 🇪🇪

Established in 2016

Contact
Kõvaküla, 69107, Estonia

     Show


5.2/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 5
33cl bottle from Väike Roosa Õllepood, Kristiine. Pours clear amber without much head to speak of. Mild hoppy and fruity aroma with graniy notes and hints of honey and vegetables. Mild hoppy flavours and a fairly light bitterness. Not exciting, but fairly drinkable.
Tried from Bottle on 30 Jan 2017 at 13:54

6/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 4 Overall 7
Pours dark brown, almost no foam on top. Aroma has some ashy dry roast character, paired with super slight smokiness, if I sniff deeper, I am also getting some wet cardboard. Taste has more of that dry roasted character, mainly coming out in the first taste and then subduing to a weak watery body and slight bitterness in the aftertaste. Overall, I would say that this one is definitely the best beer from this new brewery so far, not great but still decently drinkable. I almost like it.
Tried on 28 Dec 2016 at 15:43

4.8/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 4 Flavor 4 Texture 6 Overall 5
33cl bottle from Väike Roosa Õllepood, Kristiine. Pours slightly hazy chestnut coloured with a modest off-white head. Malty and somewhat caramelly aroma, not much smoke here. Medium sweet with slightly messy malty flavours and feels more like homebrew. It’s drinkable, but hardly impressive or memorable.
Tried from Bottle on 21 Dec 2016 at 14:32

4.8/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 5 Texture 2 Overall 4
Pours mahogany, reddish copper. Again, not much foam - nor carbonation. Nose has some caramel, most aromas covered with some smoke - which is probably a good thing because it could hide some possible flaws this beer has. Taste, however, cannot hide everything. Flavour has still some smoke, nice and not overpowering. Unfortunately everything else is quite lame - watery and slightly carboard’y malt forward taste, very light body. Drinks easy but well, that’s because it’s watery. Can finish this but well, quite shitty beer for one of the first releases from a new brewery.
Tried from Can on 19 Dec 2016 at 14:16

5.3/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 4
Pours deep amber, cop perish even, almost no foam - meaning there is very little if any carbonation. Popocorn - green apple nose, slight hoppiness as well bit still, overall not that great and feels rather infected. Taste is actually not that bad - I mean this messy, grainy and a bit sourish-watery homebrew is not great by any measure - but somehow all the mistakes are somewhat balancing each other to a beer that drinks quite easy. I can actually imagine myself drinking this, somewhere in the countryside, herding some cattle or something. Being infected doesn’t really matter here, in that kind of surroundings, this is what you would drink.
Tried from Can on 19 Dec 2016 at 13:28

4.3/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 4 Flavor 4 Texture 4 Overall 4
Bottle, batch 16-01 (shared by kairi, thanks). Pours black. Aroma is roast, sweetness, dirtiness, paper. Flavor is sweet and bitter, sugar, roast, malt, berries, paper, dirtyness. Overall: nah, another flawed and dirty brew
Tried from Bottle on 24 Nov 2016 at 14:19

4.5/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 4 Texture 4 Overall 3
Bottle, batch 16-03 (shared by kairi, thanks). Pours brownish. Aroma is smoke, sweetness, malt. Flavor is sweet and bitter, smoke, sausages, some dirtyness, paper. Finish is also dirty. Body is watery. Overall: still not good, dirty with obvious brewing flaws.
Tried from Bottle on 24 Nov 2016 at 14:09

3.8/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 4 Flavor 3 Texture 2 Overall 4
Bottle (shared by kairi, thanks). Pours amber. Aroma is berries, popcorn, some plastic, malt. Flavor is sweet and bitter, plastic, berries, popcorn. Overall: bad.
Tried from Bottle on 24 Nov 2016 at 13:59