Miller High Life
Miller Brewing Company in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States 🇺🇸
Lager - Pale Regular|
Score
3.61
|
|
The ''Champagne of Beers'' made its debut on New Year’s Eve in 1903.
Sign up to add a tick or review
4.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 4
I have had this one a number of times over the years. Overall probably my favorite of the macro lagers. Of course being the best swill is a dubious honor. Sampled from a 24 oz can this beer poured a very pale golden color with a huge soapy white head. The aroma is sweet malts with a bit of sour tang and a hint of pepper. The flavor is light dry malts with a vague hint of hops and a slightly dry nutty finish. Pretty tasty for a macro lager.
Tried
from Can
on 15 Oct 2006
at 16:58
2.8/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 3
Sampled as any Macro lager should be in a disposeable clear plastic beer cup. Yellow/gold with a small white head. grainy aroma and grainy taste with a small hint of malt.
Tried
on 11 Jun 2006
at 15:35
1.9/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 1
Texture 4
Overall 1.5
Pale piss yellow color with some light fizziness and a small white head. Light grainy aroma. Sweet grainy flavor in the beginning with strong corn flavors in the end.
Tried
on 03 Jun 2006
at 18:52
3.6/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
(Bottle 35,5 cl) Pours a beautiful, clear pilsener golden with a small, white head. Aroma of brewing syrup. Sweetish, malty body with notes of chicken fodder. "The champagne of beers", the label promises, and it does indeed look pretty in its clear bottle, but this really is just another American Pale Lager. 060406
Tried
from Bottle
on 05 May 2006
at 16:52
2.2/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2
Ah yes, it’s another pale lager that bills itself as smooth, never bitter. What they mean to say is that it’s water. Granted I’ve had worse (MGD). But calling it the champagne of beers like it’s something classy is laughable. If this is the high life, I’ll stay in the gutter.
Tried
on 27 Jan 2006
at 23:51
2.4/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 3.5
Pretty bad cheap beer, but still better than most. At least it doesn’t have an overly terrible aftertaste like most cheap beers have.
Tried
on 01 Nov 2005
at 23:29
1.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 1
Bottle. Skunked? Gosh, it’s not supposed to be, with its isomerized hops and all. Tried it from the bottle, tried it in a glass, both gave me a big mouthfeel of some plastic dissolved in it. THIS IS NOT BEER! It’s the Champale of beers.
Tried
from Bottle
on 13 Sep 2004
at 12:09
3.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
Can. Lightly lactic corn/barley malt and straw aroma. Yellow with large white head. Lightly sweet corn/barley malt and very mild hay flavor. High carbonation. Clean tasting (i.e. bland).
Tried
from Can
on 04 Jun 2004
at 13:15
3/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 2
Appearance: looks like my piss after a long night of drinking. VERY LIGHT yellow, lots of foam. Gross smell. Smells like festival garbage cans... you know the ones. The blue platic barrels with the ripped black bags in them, with hunks of hotdogs, pizza crust, and plastic beer cups spilling out over the top. Taste isn't horrible, considering it's a Miller product. But that smell that is now permeating my room is making this beer less and less drinkable by the minute. VERY light in the mouth. Feels like water going down, except the afterburps have a pukey flavor. Unyum.
Tried
from Can
on 02 Feb 2004
at 06:43
1.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 4
Overall 1
Very yellow. What's with the frigging head? It never goes away. Very bland and sweet. $3.50 for a 6 pack of 16os at the local dive should tell you who it is marketed at.
Tried
on 19 Sep 2003
at 22:32