6.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 6.5
Draught
Hazy pale yellow, small white head. Wheaty, yeasty nose. Sweetish, wheaty. A bit peppery aftertaste. Refreshing. Funny that when I rated this I made a note that this is "sweetend version of Hoegaarden" :)
Hazy pale yellow, small white head. Wheaty, yeasty nose. Sweetish, wheaty. A bit peppery aftertaste. Refreshing. Funny that when I rated this I made a note that this is "sweetend version of Hoegaarden" :)
Tried
on 27 Jul 2005
at 07:59
7.3/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 10
Overall 7
Draught Good white head, fast gone; hazy grain-yellow, milky colour. Coriander, wheat and citrus nose. Fruity (citrus), wheat and coriander again in the taste, rather sweet. Just a little sourishness from the fruity character. Slick MF, well filled. This serious body is the only thing that betrays the real ABV, as in comparison to an ordinary white. Once, Hoegaarden GC was the ONLY beer I could recognise on any blind tasting. InBev professionaly ruined it, but this, IMO, is not the same neither - it’s more like a super-strenght original Hoegaardse witte on draught.
Tried
on 25 Jun 2005
at 15:53
6.8/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 7
Tap at Kafe Belgie. Hazy golden color, short white head. Aroma is grainy, some wheat and a hint of citrus. Soft and sweet taste, slightly bitter. Refreshing palate. I didn’t expect this to be an european strong lager actually. More like a blond belgian ale.
Tried
from Draft
on 21 May 2005
at 05:02
5.5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 4
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 6
Citrusy malt aroma. Yellow/golden colour. Vey like strong Danish lager, but much maltier. That actually suits this beer very well.
Tried
on 30 Mar 2005
at 13:18
4.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 5
At ZBF 2005 Creamy, off-white head, mostly diminishing. Flat, yellow body. Weak malts in the nose. Lightly bitter flavour.
Tried
on 21 Mar 2005
at 05:07
3.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 6
Overall 3
Aroma of megaswill. Slightly darker than megaswill. Tastes like megaswill. This is not amber speciaalbier as advertised.
Tried
on 14 Mar 2005
at 12:53
7/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 8
Overall 7
Draught Pale gold; small white head. Very faint grain, very faint malt... actually, very faint nose, if any. Grainy, very fresh taste, bit of lunaria; fresh "spring" flavours (blossoms, buds,...) Light, refreshing sparkling without being fizzy. The way a light beer can be, as a good, artisanal pilsener.
Tried
from Can
on 06 Mar 2005
at 02:46
7/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 8
Overall 7
Draught Bright yellow-orange, good very fine off-white head. Grain - even wheat - in the nose, dull, but in the way a hot summer day is dull - ’languid’. Faint citrus. Very grainy-wheaty raw grains taste, really full of malt sweetness and restsugars. A bit sticky, but not annoying. Actually this beer is refreshing, which is perpendicular to its taste. Served way too cold, however. Better than the first Fourquets beer I had, but in the end, it is also dull in the strict sense of the word.
Tried
on 06 Mar 2005
at 02:40
6.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 7
Tap, cafe De Zotte, Amsterdam. Slightly hazy light brown color, short off-white head. Aroma was a bit like la Chouffe, so sweet hoppy, bit malty, not really like a bock. Nice sweet malty taste, bit caramelly, some toffee. Lingering palate.
Tried
from Draft
on 24 Oct 2004
at 08:12
3.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
[Draft at ZBF 2004] An unclear light yellow beer with a small disappearing head. The aroma is light of citrus and yeast and slightly sour (wheat?). The flavor is of sour wheat combined with corriander and ending on a dryness - a boring flavor. The body is thin. And all in all this is a boring beer. I hope Joris is right - and then I must resample it.
Tried
from Draft
on 15 Mar 2004
at 16:37