5.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5.5
Cask. Ordinary wheet-beer, Aroma is ok, but not my favorite.
Tried
from Cask
on 07 May 2005
at 03:07
2.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 1
Texture 6
Overall 0.5
Bottle in Kildeparken. Pale yellow colour, white head. Grainy citrus aroma. Flavour is fresh, dominated by sweet citrus. HORRIBLE aspartam aftertaste which costs the beer a few points in my book. I guess this is what AB Budweiser with artificial lemon juice and artificial sweetener would taste like.
Tried
from Bottle
on 01 May 2005
at 10:13
3.2/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
Bottle. Very bready, sweet aroma with a hint of sweet urine (yes, I am serious).Yellow colour, big rocky white head which is quite stable. Very watery flavour, strange bitterness. A little acidic. Thin body. Aftertaste is a bit sour. Not the worst NA lager I have had.
Tried
from Bottle
on 28 Apr 2005
at 09:11
4.6/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 5
Texture 6
Overall 4.5
Clear orange color, short head. Aroma of skunky hops, some caramel malt. Taste is quite bitter, slight hint of caramel malt, some hay.
Tried
on 23 Apr 2005
at 11:13
4.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5
(Bottle 33 cl) Not brewed in Denmark but by the Carlsberg (Tuborg) owned brewery UNICER in Portugal. It’s different in strength from the Danish version of "Tuborg Royal Danish". Very pale, strong lager with a decent head. Very mild, spiced up with some sort of sugary starch to pump up the ABV. Only a slight hint of bitterness. Easy to drink for a strong lager, but completely unspectacular. 160703
Tried
from Bottle
on 22 Apr 2005
at 15:31
4.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 5
Guess what, they started importing yet another lager to Croatia. So ok, it isn’t really imported, but brewed by Carlsberg Croatia (Panonska Pivovara), but it’s the principle that matters. We don’t need any more beers like this. If they’re really good, ok. But if they’re like this, what’s the point ? To the beer. Fluffy white head, golden color, quite carbonated. Nothing new here. Not much of an aroma, but it’s malty. Bready, maybe hoppy taste with some bad tasting malt lingering persistently in the background. Flat aftertaste. Pointless. Why isn’t it a Pilsner by the way, it clearly says so on the label.
Tried
on 30 Mar 2005
at 12:19
4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
This bear smells like leather, and the apperence was not good, The head disappeeared right away. Disappointing bear. (and it was on draft!!)
Tried
from Draft
on 21 Mar 2005
at 02:26
2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 2
Golden color. Smells. Common taste, becomes even worse considering the metallic touch.
Tried
on 14 Mar 2005
at 05:01
4.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 8
Overall 4
I have only had this one a couple of times over the years. Sampled from a 12 oz almost olive colored bottle this beer poured a medium gold color with a medium sized creamy white head. The aroma is light sour malt. The flavor is light sour malt with a light sour tang on the finish. The flavor could best be described as mild. The mouthfeel was surprisingly smooth and creamy. I really did not get any skunkyness out of this one. For a pale lager this was not too bad. Inoffensive, and the texture was nice.
Tried
from Bottle
on 26 Jan 2005
at 15:27
4.6/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 4.5
Bottle. Slightly darker than golden colour. Big white head. Sweetish, roasted grain flavour. Aftertaste also grainish. Some sort of spice? Does not appeal to me.
Tried
from Bottle
on 22 Jan 2005
at 10:58