C'est What - County Durham Brewing Company Coffee Porter

Coffee Porter

 

C'est What - County Durham Brewing Company in Pickering, Ontario, Canada 🇨🇦

  Porter Regular
Score
6.43
ABV: 5.9% IBU: - Ticks: 7
Sign up to add a tick or review

Join Us


     Show


8.1
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8.5

bes t coffee porter out there. Very rich, and strong in coffee flavour. awesome stuff. aroma is coffee, flavour is coffee. great stuff.

Tried on 27 Feb 2025 at 06:11


6.8
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6

Way too much espresso on the nose here and not enough beer in the whole affair. Pours black with creamy mocha head and great lacing. Really not many porter characteristics. Light sour finish with some bitterness. C’est What Festival.

Tried on 15 Sep 2013 at 14:04


5
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 5

Draught at C’est What, Toronto
Black color, with no head. Both aroma and flavor remind of cheap coffee; the mouthfeel is weak and dry; ordinary bitterness.

Tried on 14 Oct 2012 at 13:48


8.1
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8.5

Draught, at C’est What, Toronto on 10th June 2008. Rich dark porter ale, smoother than Mill Street’s Coffee Porter but exquisitely flavoursome and a perfect beer on which to finish an evening’s drinking.

Tried on 31 Jan 2010 at 13:17


6.2
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 6

Tap at C’est What: Poured a light black color porter with a light foamy head with average retention and minimal lacing. Aroma of dry coffee with light roasted malt notes. Taste is also dominated by dry coffee notes with some light bitter roasted malt notes. Dryness is well balance with good carbonation but body is somewhat thin. Not bad for the style but nothing to write home about as well.

Tried from Draft on 23 Apr 2009 at 16:09


5.4
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5.5

Brown/black. Dry, medium bodied, looong coffe flavour. OK, but moderately interesting.

Tried on 09 Jan 2002 at 11:21


4.6
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 2 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5.5

On cask: dark brown, hardly any aroma; very beany-tasting. I don't know what kind of beans these are, but I don't like them. They give the beer a pronounced vegetal taste. On cask this is subdued a little bit, and the chocolatey malt profile is much more prevalent. The body is ultra smooth, too, with more hop bitterness. On nitrotap all the good things about this beer are killed leaving just the raw, vegetal bean notes. The rating for the cask version is given. The rating for the nitro version is 0.7, with the only points coming for appearance.

Tried from Cask on 19 Oct 2001 at 23:25