Laker Lager
Waterloo Brewing Company in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada 🇨🇦
Lager - Pale Regular|
Score
4.45
|
|
Sign up to add a tick or review
2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1
a buck a beer!
Well i’m not getting my hopes up for this one. Bottle was handed to me by my mothers boyfriend at a BBQ at his place.
Well, typical macro lager smell, vegggies, corny, and pale malts. Flavour is again your typical macro lager. Not much flavour at all, but what you do get it cooked vegetables, and cheaps grains. Blech, will not have again.
Well i’m not getting my hopes up for this one. Bottle was handed to me by my mothers boyfriend at a BBQ at his place.
Well, typical macro lager smell, vegggies, corny, and pale malts. Flavour is again your typical macro lager. Not much flavour at all, but what you do get it cooked vegetables, and cheaps grains. Blech, will not have again.
Tried
from Bottle
on 27 Feb 2025
at 12:10
5.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 6.5
Label is quite different than this. Has a big blue maple leaf on it. Drank right from the twist off cap bottle. I assume its pale yellow & clear. Big first swig yields a fairly reasonable tasting cheap pale lager. Good co2 makes it quite quaffable as well as behaved. Civilized decent thirst quenching beer. Good job brick.
Tried
from Bottle
on 07 Jun 2017
at 15:56
6/10
Tried
on 26 Jan 2017
at 22:29
3.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 2
Overall 4
Originally rated September 2005. Hadn’t had this beer in a long time (back when the label was black). Now, everything is blue with a maple leaf too (blue as well). Sample from the can this time. Pours a golden light colour with a white head. Not much retention, but creamy lace on the side of the glass. There is hardly any aromas to this beer. Watery mouthfeel. The taste at first is kind of weird. Expecting caramel, but instead get some bitterness... mixed with some sourness. Then it goes down smooth. Light malt aftertaste. Remember it being better the first time.
Tried
from Can
on 24 Jan 2012
at 18:11
3.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3
There’s nothing I like better than finding yet another cheap lager with a name I don’t recognize..... and all the wonders of why it’s made ensue. Has a boring golden body with a weak head. The aroma is tin and slightly rotting cabbage. Flavour is weak cardboard with a dry particle-board finish and a slight hint of brown sugar. Boring, bad, but vaguely refreshing.
Tried
on 15 Aug 2011
at 16:43
1.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
Bottle: Poured a deep clear lager with a large bubbly head with minimal retention and no lacing. Aroma is dominated by adjunct with some grioss sweetness. Taste is quite bland with some bad adjunct and some gross sweetness being easily discernable. Quite forgetable and you have to think that a buck a beer can get you something better.
Tried
from Bottle
on 28 Dec 2008
at 22:52
1.9/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
Grainy and carbonic.........................................................
Tried
on 11 Feb 2001
at 22:34