Belle-Vue

Commercial Brewery in Sint-Pieters-Leeuw, Flemish Brabant, Belgium 🇧🇪
Owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev

Established in 1927

Contact
Bergensesteenweg 144, Sint-Pieters-Leeuw, 1600, Belgium
Subsidiaries
Description
The Belle-Vue brewery is a story of more than 100 years of craftsmanship. Philémon Vanden Stock started as a so-called ''gueuze steker'' as early as 1913: he buys lambic from local brewers and uses it to create "Gueuze". In 1927 he took over the Belle-Vue café in Anderlecht, which was also the start of the Belle-Vue brand. When he took over the Vos Kina brewery in Molenbeek in 1943, he changed its name to the "Belle-Vue" brewery. He transforms from a gueuze steker into brewer. Under the leadership of son Constant Vanden Stock, the brewery grows strongly, partly through numerous acquisitions in the 50s, 60s and 70s. In 1975, the brewery moves into the old site of the Timmermans brewery in Zuun (Sint-Pieters-Leeuw). Belle-Vue has been part of AB InBev since 1981. Within AB InBev, the Belle-Vue brewery also functions as a pilot brewery and plays an important role in the Belgian network.

     Show


6.8/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 7
Bottle - Aroma of slightly sour apples not unlike a cider. Dark tan color. Sweet-tart flavor with slight hint of apples again but with a rather unpleasant metallic aftertaste (fades as beer warms). A nicely complex beer but a less tart gueuze.
Tried from Bottle on 12 Oct 2004 at 11:58

6.3/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 7 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 7
The first Lambic I ever tried. Left me a bit dissapointed. Maybe it was the bottle, maybe it was that fine kriek smell that made me expect something special. Don’t know now. The colour was a nice deep red, but the head was big, and pink (which was in a way off-putting). The taste was sour, with the cherries barely showing from time to time, and it felt watered down.
Tried from Bottle on 18 Sep 2004 at 04:08

7/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 6 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 7
Bottled (BB 01/2005)
Dark ruby red color, almost no head. Sour kriek nose. Sour, sweet, mould and earthy flavor. Short kriek/cherry aftertaste, sour. (8/3/6/3/13 3.3)
Re-rate, bottled (BB 03/2005)
Cheery red with good creamy reddish head, lace. Earthy, mould aroma but same time fresh. Taste is extremely freshing with some earthy and mould tones. Cherry is underlying somewhere in a palate. Quite thin, quickly finish with some sourness. (6/4/7/4/14 3.5)
Corked bottle (BB 01/2007). Deep red, clear. Small red head. Nose is very metallic, mixed with cherry. Drier than I remembered, even sour, slightly metallic. Better than its fame. (6/4/7/4/14 3.5)
Tried from Bottle on 10 Sep 2004 at 17:07

6.6/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 4 Texture 8 Overall 6.5
Bottle Pours a cloudy deep red with a good frothy white head that never completely goes away. It and nice lacing are maintained well. Aroma is a ver nice sour cherry with earthy musty hints. Flavor however leaves some to be desired. That strong cherry flavor is missing and only a tease of what could be there. Bread, yeast, old wood barrels are a nice inclusion but dissapointing on the cherry. Feel is lively and refreshing. Not very dry or sweet. The after taste is more like sucking on a piece of the barell used to store the stuff. Not bad, just doesn’t compare to the Lindemans.
Tried from Bottle on 31 Aug 2004 at 23:39

7/10 Appearance 10 Aroma 9 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 6
A very nice dark cherry aroma with dark red color. Flavor of dark cherry but rather weak - did not match what I anticipated from the aroma. Shared with a group - the guys hated it and the girls liked it - there you go. Addendum: Had a bottle cellared for about 18 months, a totally different beer - aroma takes on the more traditional mustiness with cherry sweetness greatly fading. Flavor matches aroma - a musty, dry light cherry flavor. Aging made this much more like a traditional lambic.
Tried from Bottle on 05 Aug 2004 at 13:55

6/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 7 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 6
Bottled (BB 01/2005)
Red, good steady head, lots of lace. Rasberry nose, strong aroma. Sweet and a bit sour rasberry flavor. A bit sour aftertaste.
Tried from Bottle on 01 Aug 2004 at 08:20

5.6/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 6 Flavor 4 Texture 6 Overall 5.5
A deep red beer with a small head. The aroma is very strong of cherries. The flavor is very sweet with strong notes of cherries and only slightly sour. Not nearly sour enough.
Tried on 11 Jul 2004 at 11:48

3.5/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 3 Flavor 3 Texture 4 Overall 3
Light clear orange color, big frothy off-white head. Sour artificial aroma of sirupy and sticky raspberry, which is also the way it tastes. Very thin, short finish.
Tried on 03 Jul 2004 at 13:55

7.3/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 7
This one was Gueuze La Bécasse (Truth to tell, I cheated a little. This old sample has not only a different (earlier) label, it was still named slightly different - Gueuze lambic de la Becasse . Mind you, ten years ago the original Brabrux was closed already - maybe still from De Neve...) No head; dark foxy-golden, like liquid honey. Nose of sugar syrup, touch woody, but before anything, very fruity. I must confess it has a certain Sauternes-like aroma; grapes with the "noble putrefaction". Maybe also like "Muscat de Samos"; bit liquorice too. Woody, taste much less sweet & fruity than the nose. Liqueurish still, bit of "madeirisation", rather again more like a grape liqueur than port or madeira. Something burnt in the finish. slick, oily mouthfeel, viscuous, higher alcohols? This has turned out rathergood. It has, unfortunately, nothing to do with gueuze. Very sweet. Real rating for Geuze Belle Vue; 7/4/6/1/12/ 3.0 Hazy amber; thick creamy head, collapsing and very lacy. Very fruity and woody nose. Not "horseblanket" but something very similar, both sweeter and more winelike. Taste is both sweet and tart. Nothing sour. Very woody in character, vaguely almondy. Demi-sec winish character keeps very outspoken. Also wet wool? Creamy mouthfeel. In the aftertaste, everything goes wrong. The character gets outspoken artificially sweet and "forced". This isn’t gueuze. I’ve tasted American pseudo-gueuze that comes nearer the real thing. But until the abysmal finish, this is a decent beer in its own right. It reminds me (well, well, well...) of some old-time mixtures of spontaneous & top fermenting beers (Jack-Op from Wolvertem, Knal from Halle...)
Tried from Can on 22 Jun 2004 at 15:09

4.4/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 5 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 3.5
Undated bottle. Pours a very deep raspberry red, but quite clear. No sediment?? Yikes. Small light pink head. Smells of sweet black cherries, light balsamic vinegar. Flavor is right away bittersweet, not as heavily sweet and syrupy as I was expecting though. Claims to be oak aged and there is a dry, lightly astringent flavor present, but not terribly oaky tasting. Little lambic quality, the filtration no doubt taking care of that, no funk. Not trying to jump on the trash talk interbrew bandwagon, but man, this was disappointing. The flavor wasnt bad or inoffensive, but just nothing adventurous, no personality.
Tried from Bottle on 13 Jun 2004 at 18:34