Filter & sort
Show
jhaase (15105) reviewed
Original from Kronenbourg
22 years ago
5.1/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 4.5
From tap Dark golden. Well balanced. Medium body. ok crafted standardpils, but not inspiring in any way.
Tried from Draft on 22 Oct 2003 at 14:37
Boutip (10207) reviewed
1664 Blonde from Kronenbourg
22 years ago
1.8/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 1 Flavor 1 Texture 4 Overall 1
Bottle version. Golden lager with medium that disapear in no time. As for the taste: Can you spell SKUNK, can you say bad brew. Why? Why? Why? This is so bad I won't spend more time writing about this.
Tried from Bottle on 29 Sep 2003 at 09:39
fiulijn (28377) reviewed
Kanterbräu from Kronenbourg
22 years ago
2.6/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 2 Flavor 2 Texture 4 Overall 2.5
Keg.
Blond color. Very simple table beer, didn't even finish my glass…
Tried on 29 Sep 2003 at 02:17
fiulijn (28377) reviewed
Wel Scotch from Kronenbourg
23 years ago
5.1/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 4 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 5.5
Amber color. Light malt nose. Sweet and lightly smokey, simple palate. Less smokey and sweet than Adelscott.
Tried on 04 Sep 2003 at 06:29
fiulijn (28377) reviewed
1664 Blonde from Kronenbourg
23 years ago
3.4/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 3 Flavor 3 Texture 4 Overall 3.5
Blond to golden color. Very light malt aroma; too simple, without interest, just some bitterness at the end.
Tried on 19 Aug 2003 at 00:27
Sloefmans (15815) reviewed
1664 Blonde from Kronenbourg
23 years ago
4.3/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 5 Flavor 4 Texture 2 Overall 3
From a tin can in the Eurostar - 2.85 Euro for 33cl - but in truth, it was complimentary of the company... masochism for Ratebeer. Colour is arbitrary. God only knows. Nose of pale malts, grainy. I want to smell metallic, but that's prejudice. Taste is very grainy, malt, with quite some sweetness. Bitterish-metallic (this time, no mistake) finish. The metallic tang is more than just the tin can. There's an unrefined hop idea floating around, making everything harsh. Very unpleasant aftertaste, harsh without even bitterness. Light bodied, thinnish texture, the malts notwithstanding. As said, it was for free.
Tried from Can on 10 Aug 2003 at 22:51
fiulijn (28377) reviewed
Original from Kronenbourg
23 years ago
3.4/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 3 Flavor 3 Texture 4 Overall 3.5
Blond, dry, simple, just good for a hot summer day. Less weak than many others.
Tried on 02 Jul 2003 at 00:50
NotABeerProfessor (3597) reviewed
1664 Blonde from Kronenbourg
23 years ago
4.2/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 5 Flavor 3 Texture 6 Overall 4
Pretty stinky at first whiff (green bottle) but the mercaptans wafted away leaving a light malt and noble hop aroma. Gold but empty looking with thin yet firm head. Surprising body and round sweetness! Underhopped, esp in the finish, leaving a lingering sweetness, while too slight to be cloying, is too much nevertheless.
Tried from Bottle on 09 Jun 2003 at 10:37
JK (8152) reviewed
1664 Blonde from Kronenbourg
23 years ago
4.9/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 4 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 4.5
Light golden color. Head is very thin and is gone quickly. It is best on tap when allowed to warm a little. Not a bad lager.
Tried from Draft on 18 Feb 2003 at 12:28
Ungstrup (52439) reviewed
1664 Blonde from Kronenbourg
23 years ago
4.5/10 — Appearance 4 Aroma 5 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 4
A golden beer with an OK head - but it disappears all too quickly. The aroma is nicely hoppy - but a little too faint. The flavor is fresh at first, then a bit maltsweet - but then it turns watery. It gets a little back from the nice bitterness.
Tried on 09 Feb 2003 at 12:16