Subsidiaries
4.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 6
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3
An amber beer with no head at all. It has an aroma of sweet oranges and some spices I can't tell, it makes me think a little of a sodapop. It has a very tame mouthfeel - with some bubbles forming on the tongue. It tastes sweet and pretty citric - and the citric taste lingers and turns slightly bitter. Not a beer for me - at least not on a chilly danish fall night. Maybe it's better for a hot day in Mexico?
Tried
from Can
on 25 Sep 2002
at 12:52
1.5/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1
I now have the rather unpleasant distinction of having tried every beer in the "Corona" family, and my life is not really the better for it. This is easily the worst of the bunch, and you could not squeeze enough limes in the bottle to get me to try it again. There are absolutely no redeeming qualities in this beer (and I use the term lightly). The only positive thing I could possibly say about Corona Light is that it is not Bud Light.
Tried
from Bottle
on 15 Sep 2002
at 20:29
5.5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 4
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 6
One of the few decent Mexican beers I have been able to find. Maybe not quite as good as Negra Modelo (which isn't really saying too much) but along the same lines and a decent alternative. On the scale of Mexican beers this is in the upper echelon, but it really does not stand up against other more readily available Viennas. I would go with an Elliot Ness here in the states, but this one is worth a shot if you are in Mexico with only Corona and Sol as your other options.
Tried
from Can
on 09 Sep 2002
at 12:39
1.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
This certainly wasn't very especial. This may be even worse than Corona. Vile, repugnant smell. No redeeming qualities in the flavor. Truly heinous.
Tried
on 07 Aug 2002
at 20:58
4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
Slightly non-descript beer with little flavour or aroma. Nice I suppose for drinking on a warm day. The one plus point is it doesn't have the bad aftertaste of a Bud.
Tried
on 05 Aug 2002
at 16:17
2.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2
strange that this is dark. dont really know this style, nonetheless, not impressed with the beer. fleeting malt taste. syrupy. no hop presence. Slightly roasted flavor gives it a few points, as im surprised they were able to figure out how to do that in mexico.
Tried
on 10 Jul 2002
at 07:33
3.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3
probably the best mexican beer. not terrible, quite inoffensive and whats that? do i actually taste hops? a fairly decent beer for mexico.
Tried
from Can
on 10 Jul 2002
at 07:31
1.1/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
man this beer sucks. Stale beer. ameliorated by the fact that it is mostly water. nothing good about this beer. It looks very pale, only a small tinge of yellow with little to no, fizzy head. Aroma of skunked beer to the max. No hops, no malt. Flavor is unclean, thin, bland, watery and adjunt ridden. Body is extra light, fizzy. Difficult to drink when warm.
Tried
on 10 Jul 2002
at 07:27
2.4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
Dark gold, small head. Skunky with nots of malt in aroma. Strong skunk flavor with some sourness. A touch of bitterness in the finish.
Tried
on 02 Jul 2002
at 08:16
3.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
Tart somewhat chemically aroma. Light gold with small head. Lightly sweet and clean. Not bad - not overly bland. Slight but definite metallic taste.
Tried
on 02 Jul 2002
at 08:14