Subsidiaries
2.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 6
Overall 1.5
Bottle.Gold color with nice head. Aroma, cheap beer with slight lime. Taste, cheap beer with slight lime. Not good.
Tried
from Bottle
on 24 Mar 2025
at 05:12
5.9/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 5.5
Tap. Yuck. Not very good. Hay, leaves aroma. Watery, pilsner taste. Golden color with decent head and tiny bubbles. My buddy Jeff wants me to rate it higher so I will.
Tried
from Draft
on 24 Mar 2025
at 04:43
2.2/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 6
Overall 1
Can. Taste like flavored water. Aroma, what aroma. Very pale yellow. Decent head but disappears quickly, some lace.
Tried
from Can
on 24 Mar 2025
at 04:42
5.2/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 6
Overall 5
Bottle. So this is a fruit beer that taste like a Cider. A not very good cider. Clear gold color. No head, a few bubbles. Aroma weak watery apple juice.
Tried
from Bottle
on 24 Mar 2025
at 04:40
2.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 6
Overall 1
Can. Continue to slum it. Another terrible beer. Color, pale gold. Some head. Very watery in taste but slightly more than Busch. Aroma, straw, hay. Not good.
Tried
from Can
on 24 Mar 2025
at 04:39
2/10
watery, earthy and slightly cardboardy with some hay and earthiness
Tried
from Bottle
on 22 Mar 2025
at 21:36
2/10
sweet, corn and earthy with some cardboard and stuffy notes
Tried
on 22 Mar 2025
at 21:34
4/10
Tried
from Bottle
on 22 Mar 2025
at 21:20
2.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 6
Overall 1
Bottle. Well I guess this and bud were at one time the two Kingdaddys of beer. Just typical macro pale lager. Pale gold. Medium head. Not very good.
Tried
from Bottle
on 21 Mar 2025
at 06:54
2.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 6
Overall 1
Bottle. I remember when this beer first came out. It was suppose to be some kind of big difference in taste. Wrong! Just another of the typical American pale lagers that are out there. Not very good.
Tried
from Bottle
on 21 Mar 2025
at 06:54