About
JW Lees is a family brewery company, founded in 1828 by retired cotton manufacturer John Lees. We’re based in Middleton in the North West of Manchester and own JW Lees Brewery, JW Lees Pubs, The Alderley Edge Hotel, The Trearddur Bay Hotel and Willoughby’s Wine Merchants. We’re a sixth-generation family business which employs over 1,300 people, 140 at the brewery and site in Middleton Junction and over 1,100 in our 42 managed pubs, inns and hotels. We also let a further 105 pubs to our Pub Partners.
Filter & sort
Show
7.5/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 8
A dark amber beer with a disappearing beige head. The aroma is woody with notes of sherry as well as light notes of alcohol. The flavor is sweet with lots of caramel as well as alcohol and hints of sherry. The mouthfeel is sticky.
Tried on 16 Jan 2005 at 14:19

7.4/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 7.5
An amber beer with no head. The aroma is domintated by alcohol, but also with notes of peach and spices. The flavor is extremely sweet and very malty as well as lots of caramel, but there is surprisingly no Port present.
Tried on 16 Jan 2005 at 14:16

6.3/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 6
Slight gushing to good yellowish head, slightly irregular; hazy orangey amber beer. Very nutty, sweet nose: aroma of rainwater in which sugar, honey and red jam have been dissolved. Short jam-fruity flavour in the taste, then some (bitter)hops, obvious but not aggressive (enough?). Leafy aroma, mainly sweet taste. Jam (strawberry?) returns with each sip. Palate clears off quick, leaving hoppy, slight bitter flavour. But I can still feel stickiness in the O.C. Medium bodied at best. Let’s say I’ve had way better from Middleton Junction. I suppose this is boy’s Lees?
Tried from Can on 03 Jan 2005 at 14:28

8/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 8 Texture 8 Overall 8
Typical cognac colour - poured in a cognac balloon -, just a little rim of head. Brandy, sweet nose and - on the risk of being called mad - the smell of paella.... saffron? Sweet, liqueurish, grapey taste, and a bit of sulphur. Slick, oily quite fiery alcoholburn. More than nice, but I seem to prefer the "ordinary" Harvest ale. I cannot detect apples nor calva. Thanks Bill and Warren!
Tried from Can on 12 Dec 2004 at 03:20

7.6/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 8 Texture 6 Overall 7.5
Clear amber body, thin off-white head. Dense aroma of port, soy, honey, caramel, raisin, and alcohol. Rich, leathery, salty palate. Nice apple flavors complement rich, sweet breads, honey, a touch of soy, caramel, and ethanol. Rather syrupy body masks the alcohol quite well; even though the flavors are apparent, there is very little to no associated "burn." Very good, bordering on over-the-top.
Tried on 20 Aug 2004 at 21:43

7.6/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 7.5
Copper to strawberry blonde in color, with a heavy nose of syrup, caramel and a hint of the port - thick mouthfeel feels slick on the tongue - lots of cherry and strawberry - caramel and an alcohol burn that is pleasant, not overwhelming - I don’t sense much of an impact on the flavor from the port barrel aging - there is a slight vinous character, but it is far in the background, and I would hardly call it port-like in quality - grapes and slight bitterness in the finish - overall quite nice, but not as good as regular old JW Lees.
Tried on 09 Aug 2004 at 16:19

4.8/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 5 Texture 2 Overall 4
2003 bottle. Pours a golden orange with some deep browns and dark red tints. Small off-white head. Smells fairly sweet (candied apples, sugary grape juice, extra sweet caramel) but otherwise just basically malty. Flavor is ridiculously sweet. It’s like eating candy. You’ve got the sweetness of Lee’s Harvest ale to begin with, full of caramel malt and sugar, and then toss in some extra sweet port and it’s just a mess of sugary candied sweetness. I find almost no vinous notes that I would expect from port aging, no real complexities for that matter. Body is at least smooth and drinkable, but wow, this is too much for me. J.W. Lee’s does not need to be made sweeter than it already is.
Tried from Bottle on 05 Jul 2004 at 16:21

8.8/10 — Appearance 5 Aroma 10 Flavor 10 Texture 8 Overall 8.5
Tried from Bottle from Premier Gourmet on 06 Jun 2004 at 04:00

9.6/10 — Appearance 10 Aroma 10 Flavor 9 Texture 10 Overall 9.5
Bottled, 2002 vintage, thanks rauchbier!
Hazy amber, no head. Deep woody, malty aroma. Superb megadeep, chewy maltiness. Port and wood is very obvious. Alcohol is there, but only enhances the fabulous flavours, and despite it’s size it is hugely drinkable. The sweetness however creeps up on you, butmy overall impression is that this is the best showpiece there is when it comes to malt character. Ultra-superb!
Tried from Bottle on 26 May 2004 at 10:51

6.8/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 8 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 6
AOBF 04, Lagavulin Cask aged. This is the best example I’ve tried of using whiskey cask aging to improve a beer. The naturally highly sweet nature of this beer is cut perfectly by the rich, smokey, dry, alcoholic single malt. Complex and stupendous tasting. Pours a lovely amber-auburn with some darker mahogany tinges, smaller head than the regular version due to the single malt no doubt, but still good looking. I just can’t say enough about this one. It’s like milk and cookies, peanut butter and jelly, thelma and louise, etc. . . Perfect match that seems made for each other. Wonderfully complex, powerful and has the typical lee’s harvest ale smooth, creamy mouthfeel. This is pretty close to perfect, but I want to try a larger sample again and then rerate. I think the small sample size may have contributed to my very high rating, as I think this beer may get very overpowering in large quantities. Big downside is that these are highly pasteurised; there is no sediment whatsoever in the bottle. Rerate, finally. The finish is still divine, with a perfect lagavulin flavor rounding it out, but the problem (and the problem with the regular Lee’s Harvest, IMHO) is that it is just too damned sweet, cloying, and a bit too lacking in complexities due to the heavy filtration and pasteurisation. A wonderful combo here, though, I just wish you could taste the lagavulin more throughout the body, not just on the end. I can’t say I find this beer to be a worldbeater; the lagavulin is spectacular, but the beer, not so much.
Tried from Cask on 20 May 2004 at 10:37