About
JW Lees is a family brewery company, founded in 1828 by retired cotton manufacturer John Lees. We’re based in Middleton in the North West of Manchester and own JW Lees Brewery, JW Lees Pubs, The Alderley Edge Hotel, The Trearddur Bay Hotel and Willoughby’s Wine Merchants. We’re a sixth-generation family business which employs over 1,300 people, 140 at the brewery and site in Middleton Junction and over 1,100 in our 42 managed pubs, inns and hotels. We also let a further 105 pubs to our Pub Partners.
Filter & sort
Show
6/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 6
Standard ale appearance with a lightly hopped caramel aroma. The flavour is very caramel orientated and mildly hopped. An average strong ale.
Tried on 14 Jul 2003 at 14:58

8.2/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 9 Flavor 8 Texture 8 Overall 8
December 2001 Bottle (Sampled 5/1/03 - 4.0): Pours a dark copper color with a medium and dense beige head. Aroma is very sweet malt and caramel, and the alcohol is well masked. Full-bodied and chewy with flavors of caramel and rum, along with some malt. As with the aroma, you don't really get a sense of the alcohol level in the flavor. Finish is long and sweet (borderline cloying). $4 for a 9.6oz seems a little high but it was worth it.
1999 Bottle (Sampled 9/23/03 - 4.1): This vintage is a ruddy dark amber color with a medium beige head. Thin lacing. Aroma is very sweet, mostly caramel with some malt as well. The richness of body is similar to the 2001 vintage. Very rich and chewy. The flavor is very sweet caramel and malt along with some plum. Alcohol is well hidden. The finish is full and sweet. I am giving this vintage a slightly higher score.
Tried from Bottle on 01 May 2003 at 06:10

6.8/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 8 Flavor 7 Texture 4 Overall 7
Since I really love the harvest ale, I was expecting a great deal from this, and I have to say I am a bit disappointed. This beer is downright chunky. There are huge floaties; it looks like there are pebbles in here. The aroma is pretty good, with large doses of yeast, fruits and pastries. The flavor is decent as well, but not great. Peppery, spicy, some malty sweetness, some espresso as others pointed out. The finish, however, is astringent and bitter, overshadowing any goodness left behind by the flavor. No balance. I'd say it needs some aging, but I have no idea how old this bottle is.
Tried from Bottle on 14 Mar 2003 at 18:02

8.9/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 9 Flavor 9 Texture 8 Overall 9.5
2001 bottle. What an odd barley wine. Cloudy ruby appearance. Aroma like brown sugar and cookie dough, that makes you think back to your mother's kitchen at Christmas time when you were a child. The first sip is disturbingly sweet and syrupy. "Ick," you think. But then your tongue gets used to the idea. There is a tapestry of flavors in this beer that not many beers come close to. Carmelized brown sugar, molassas, plums, roasted oats, cherries, oak, maple syrup, and many other flavors I can't identify. This beer does the tango with your tongue and leaves if gasping in a puddle of its own sweat. The thick, sticky body of it coats your mouth and throat. I can compare it to Samichlaus and WWS, but as a barley wine. An outstanding and original beer experience.
Tried from Bottle on 03 Mar 2003 at 17:41

6/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 6
Amber; very fruity (raspberry, blackberry); some hop, acidic notes in the finish.
Tried on 19 Aug 2002 at 11:50

6.4/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 6.5
Light amber; fruity, hoppy, slight berry note; sweet finish.................
Tried on 19 Aug 2002 at 11:50

5.5/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 6 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 5
Sampled cask conditioned in Manchester.
Dark amber. Nutty aroma. Dryish and light bodied. Honeyish finish.
Tried from Cask on 19 Aug 2002 at 05:48

5/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 4 Texture 6 Overall 5
Sampled cask conditioned in Manchester.
Pale amber. Lightly flowery aroma. Light bodied, bready with sweet finish.
Tried from Cask on 19 Aug 2002 at 05:47

8.5/10 — Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 9 Texture 10 Overall 9
Addition 2000 bottle sampled in April 2002: Very rich fruity malty aroma, with fig, raisin, and vanilla as primary notes. Cloudy amber-brown with small head and minimal lacing, lightly carb'd. Full rich, sweet malty flavor, full of esters. Alcohol presence is clearly there, but it doesn't whop you like a 12% might. Med bitterness keeps things in check, but this beer is all about malt, alcohol, and esters. Exceptionally drinkable for what it is, too. 1998 brew (sampled June 2001): Amazing beer. Strong, dark-fruit almost overwhelming aroma made me cautious - but such amazing balance in the flavor was a big surprise! Very flavorful but not overwhelming - excellent hop presence for a classic British barleywine. Exceedingly quaffable for its strength - kinda dangerous. Smooooth. Cloudy (bottle-conditioned) copper-brown, even head with good retention. Thick solid lacing.
Tried from Bottle on 09 Apr 2002 at 11:24

7.9/10 — Appearance 6 Aroma 8 Flavor 8 Texture 8 Overall 8.5
2002 Vintage, rated 2009
Hazy amber. Cookie-ish malt with slight graham crackery honey note and a hint of chocolate. Very sweet and honeyish like a Polish mead. It’s got a lot of style right now, but it can handle another ten years or so given the high level of sweetness still in the beer.

2001 Re-rate
I had a couple of vintages one after the other - a 1997 and a 1988. Both are malty and rich. The former had notes of brown sugar, apricot and burnt raisin toast. The latter had very well-developed flavours. The malts were deep and cohesive, the alcohol strong bu unobtrusive. Thick. Not a complex beer, but given long periods in the bottle it retains a lovely richness of malt. Surely one of the finest malty barley wines around. 8-2-8-5-16 = 3.9
Tried from Can on 06 Jul 2001 at 19:49