Samuel Adams Cranberry Lambic

Cranberry Lambic

 

Samuel Adams in Boston, Massachusetts, United States πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

  Lambic Style - Fruit Rotating Out of Production
Score
5.23
ABV: 5.9% IBU: - Ticks: 60
Samuel Adams Cranberry Lambic is a fruit beer that draws its flavor not just from the cranberries it is brewed with, but also from the unique fermentation character imparted by the rare wild yeast strain. The result is a flavor rich in fruitiness and reminiscent of cranberries and bananas, cloves and nutmeg. The yeast fermentation also will create a slight sourness on the sides of the palate, a signature of the original Lambic style which, with the subtle cereal note from the wheat malt, remind its drinker that, as fruity a beer as this is, it is still a beer.
 

Sign up to add a tick or review

Join Us


     Show


6.4/10 β€” Appearance 8 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 6.5
Well first of all this is not a lambic. Let us all be perfectly clear on that. Not so long ago I would have been ignorant of the difference, and no doubt when the Boston Beer Company first started brewing this the people who could have called them on this injustice were no doubt few and far between. As American beer sensibilities have grown, this brewer really should step up and rename the beer but that is really another subject all together. Let us actually get to the task of rating the beer. Firstly put aside all notion of this being a lambic - as already discussed. Next look at presentation. A pretty label - if rather typical for the brewer, and at least a brown bottle. The pour is orange-amber color with a medium sized yellow head. Pretty enough but not exactly noteworthy in appearance. The aroma is light and vaguely fruity - though I would have been hard pressed to guess cranberry on nose alone. The flavor is largely lacking in any real malt flavor or body. There is a sour fruit flavor that is distinctly cranberry but this beer has little else to challenge the palate. In passing the beer around the reviews ran from "God awful" to "Not too shabby." In essence what we get is a mild, fruit flavored beer that appeals to that type of drinker and disappoints those who prefer more body and malt.
Tried from Can on 27 Oct 2004 at 14:30

5.8/10 β€” Appearance 8 Aroma 5 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 6
Bottle Pours a hazy orange/amber with a nice white head. Plenty of lacing. Not much Cranberry in the aroma, instead a yeasty spicy notes more like a belgian. Flavor is fairly sweet, simple, little cranberry, and a woody apple spice type flavor. Finishes nice, with just a lingering earthy taste. I love Lambics....this is not a Lambic
Tried from Bottle on 18 Oct 2004 at 23:05

4.1/10 β€” Appearance 4 Aroma 6 Flavor 4 Texture 2 Overall 3.5
Indistinguishable from their other beers. I expected some red coloring. Pleasant fruit aroma. The smallest hint of fruit flavor, with some wheat also hiding. Lambic, huh?
Tried on 25 Dec 2003 at 01:17

4.1/10 β€” Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 3 Texture 4 Overall 3.5
Lambic? Most certainly not. It's almost not even a fruit beer. Light, mildly tart, very thin bodied, watery palate, slight wheat taste - something in this tastes like cough syrup mixed with play doh. I must agree with hopscotch, it's almost a crime to market this as a lambic.
Tried on 16 Nov 2003 at 20:27

7.1/10 β€” Appearance 6 Aroma 8 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 7.5
Brown in colour, very cranberry in smell...very sweet taste full of cranberry taste!
Tried on 10 Jan 2003 at 18:26

2.5/10 β€” Appearance 4 Aroma 2 Flavor 2 Texture 2 Overall 3
Cloudy red amber color. Yeasty nose.Fruity yeast taste with cloying yeasty finish
Tried on 06 Jan 2003 at 09:41

4.5/10 β€” Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 4 Texture 4 Overall 4
2001 bottle. pours a nice whitish-yellow. I was so impressed that the cranberry was subtle after having the cherry wheat. I love the bitterness too. why dont they make this not seasonal so i can study it more! 2002 bottle. Well I had it the next release the winter after this. TERRIBLE. one word, CLOYING. It had this nasty maple syrup taste that pervaded the beer and lingered on the palate forcing me to rinse my mouth out with something else. Let’s see what next season brings. 2004 bottle Garbage. Lightly sweet cranberries, some light pils malts. This resembles a lambic about as much as I resemble a giraffe. It’s funny, though, I still do remember that first bottle back in 2001 being pretty good. Probably just an inexperienced palate, though. Can’t imagine this was ever actually good.
Tried from Bottle on 09 Jul 2002 at 12:52

4.5/10 β€” Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 4 Texture 4 Overall 3
Let me start off by saying I like cranberries. Cranberry bread, cranberry muffins...but not cranberry beer. The aroma was interesting but I barely finished the bottle, and had to drink it in short doses to get through. Just not my thing I guess.
Tried from Bottle on 10 Mar 2002 at 23:58

6.1/10 β€” Appearance 6 Aroma 5 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 7.5
Dry and tart, but lacking the punch, funkiness, or complexity of a true lambic. Still, its relative clean flavor makes it a fairly easy drinking beer with a mild fruity flavor that can appeal to many. Weird smell, though.
Tried from Can on 02 Apr 2001 at 20:24

4.8/10 β€” Appearance 4 Aroma 5 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 5
A light, refreshing brew. A touch light on the cranberries, and certainly so on the lambic.
Tried on 02 Dec 2000 at 21:21