Subsidiaries
5.1/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5.5
Rather unremarkable brew. Characteristic is reminiscent of a standard lager with some brown food coloring thrown in. Light and crisp, yet lacking in body that should be found in a Dunkel. Wish I had something better available at my own wedding!
Tried
on 19 Aug 2002
at 06:42
1.8/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1
This tastes better than bud in that the cereal graininess is not as prevalent. I actually can handle this one almost as easily as miller lite or blue light when getting drunk, much better than coors lite. almost has a taste to it too.
Tried
from Can
on 16 Jul 2002
at 12:45
1.4/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
Sharp. that is the word that comes to mind. It uses it's alcohol and light fizzy cereal taste to cut the back of your throat. a terrible beer
Tried
on 10 Jul 2002
at 12:49
6.5/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 5
Flavor 6
Texture 8
Overall 7
This is the most extraordinary thing when one tries the bottle then tries the tap. Unreal on draught. Creamy, smooth, fresh hoppy notes. Good amount of bitterness left over with even some fruity notes. Has a great, nutty aroma.
Tried
from Bottle
on 10 Jul 2002
at 11:54
2.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2
Watery, with some lightly crisp apple flavor, very dry and papery. Not metallic at least, and it’s very flavorless. Piss colored, always taste skunked and cardboard-like. Nowhere near drinkable if it has warmed any. Rerate, swill tasting with Barry and Stephen. I’m ashamed that I’m rerating this, but I do feel that I was biased against the color. Rolling rock, while no sight for soar eyes, is not as clear as some of the worst pale lagers, and it does have some head retention. The aroma, does not reek of horrid syrupy corn sugar (though it’s no walk in the park either).
Tried
on 10 Jul 2002
at 07:23
3.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
who hasnt had this. not the worst of cheap beers though, some redeeming flavor (not much though)
Tried
on 09 Jul 2002
at 13:06
1.2/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 1
well this is another terrible beer that ive had the displeasure of buying too often. what to say about these beers. gotta love the taste in your mouth the next morning.
Tried
on 09 Jul 2002
at 13:05
1.1/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
is this the worst beer available to the general public?? Quite possibly. sometimes i get tempted to buy it though when its on sale for about 299 a 12 pack
Tried
on 09 Jul 2002
at 13:04
1.5/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1
well it tastes less like whatever busch tastes like (shit) so thats a plus.
Tried
on 09 Jul 2002
at 13:03
1.4/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
i had to drink this warm a few times while getting drunk fortunately it was up against natty light. busch won
Tried
on 09 Jul 2002
at 13:02