Subsidiaries
2.8/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
............................................................................
Tried
on 27 Dec 2000
at 16:08
2.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 3.5
Crispy, overattenuated as per the style. Grainy notes most prominent, but they tend to disappear quickly.
Tried
on 28 Nov 2000
at 19:54
2.5/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 3
When Interbrew thins out the Labatts roster, this will be one of the first to go. No one will notice.
Tried
on 28 Nov 2000
at 19:52
3.4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Slight malt accent. Still light. .........................................
Tried
on 28 Nov 2000
at 19:50
2/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 2
Ultra-bland golden ale, a perfect complement to Labatt's line of ultra-bland golden lagers.
Tried
on 28 Nov 2000
at 19:47
2.4/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 2.5
Pale straw colour; worty aroma; very watery with minerals and wort dominating the flavour. Yee-haw.
Tried
on 28 Nov 2000
at 19:45
2.6/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
Anybody remember the masterpiece that was MaxIce?...........................
Tried
on 19 Nov 2000
at 22:10
4.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 4
Flavor 5
Texture 6
Overall 4
You know, this wasn't that bad a beer. Haven't seen it in years, though....
Tried
on 16 Sep 2000
at 23:17
1.5/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1
A distinctly terrible bit of bile from one of the Big Two. Very grainy.....
Tried
on 16 Sep 2000
at 23:15
2.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 2.5
Finally getting around to re-rating this and bringing the numbers down to reality. I still think its one of the better mass produced lagers, but not actually good. Basically, light gold, no head, weak herbal aroma and flavor with some lemony notes. Strange.
Tried
on 26 Apr 2000
at 15:16