Subsidiaries
1.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
Maybe it's just a name think making me think about it more, but this stuff is sharp. Spikey and nasty with a big offensive taste. Probably was just skunked, probably couldnt tell if it wasnt though. Deeper color and spicy aroma of rancid grains.
Tried
on 14 Oct 2003
at 10:05
1.1/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
Oh my god, how could I forget to rate this one????? Sweeter and more metallic than miller lite and bud light, but then has a sickly watery nasty finish.
Tried
on 14 Oct 2003
at 09:58
3.9/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 2
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 3.5
Bottle. This is a very non-offensive beer. It's watery, tasteless, but doesn't offens in the slightest. Very little flavor, no off-flavors (mainly because it has no flavor), no aroma... I actually think this is the best of the american macro beers, onlyu because it doesn't offend...
Tried
from Bottle
on 05 Oct 2003
at 20:32
3.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Clear golden color. Quite typical american style beer. Some rice in the taste. Weak aroma, bit brackish.
Tried
from Can
on 05 Oct 2003
at 08:28
1.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 4
Overall 1
Very yellow. What's with the frigging head? It never goes away. Very bland and sweet. $3.50 for a 6 pack of 16os at the local dive should tell you who it is marketed at.
Tried
on 19 Sep 2003
at 22:32
1.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 1
Don't drink a beer named after a pork product. Classic commercials from yesteryear made me want to drink this. Pale and watery.
Tried
on 19 Sep 2003
at 20:41
1.9/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
Not dreadful in the sense that I spit the "beer" out, but dreadful in the sense that a glass of water makes a better "beer." This pale yellow sewage is sure to get your DMS-lovin' tastebuds kicking it old school though. Pretty pathetic stuff. And, to think the bar I tried this at (thanks to it being a "rate") was in the process of removing Great Lakes Dortmunder Gold...
Tried
on 24 Aug 2003
at 18:47
2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1
Hard to distinguish from Ice house, maybe a little less alcohol stale malt and more sour bitterness. Any way you look at it, very bad.
Tried
on 24 Jul 2003
at 07:04
2.2/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2
A solid light beer. Very inoffensive taste, maybe a bit bitter (sour) probably due to low quality. I dont know, another light beer, better than high life not as good as miller lite, imo
Tried
on 23 Jul 2003
at 16:44
1.8/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1
This is better than the miller high life line, but not as good as Miller Lite. A little more sour, with some flat stale notes that linger, though not nearly as stale as High Life.
Tried
on 23 Jul 2003
at 12:25