Subsidiaries
1.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 4
Overall 1
Icehouse... ugh. Appearance: nothing special. Looks like cheap beer. Smell: awful! Did the canners puke into the beer while they were canning it? Tatse: hideous. I'll pass up Icehouse and drink water if there's no other beer available. Mouthfeel gets a bump above taste because while it's in your mouth, you don't gag. You wait until you swallow. This beer, for me at least, is undrinkable.
Tried
from Can
on 02 Feb 2004
at 18:36
1.1/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
This is a terrible beer, no matter how you drink it. The head is a frothy muck, the color is urine yellow, and the taste is a too sweet cheap taste that leaves a funky aftertaste, and gives me a headache. I have a hard time drinking these even if they're free. In my opinion, this is the worst of the mainstream beers, making it quite possibly the worst of all time.
Tried
on 02 Feb 2004
at 06:44
3/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 2
Appearance: looks like my piss after a long night of drinking. VERY LIGHT yellow, lots of foam. Gross smell. Smells like festival garbage cans... you know the ones. The blue platic barrels with the ripped black bags in them, with hunks of hotdogs, pizza crust, and plastic beer cups spilling out over the top. Taste isn't horrible, considering it's a Miller product. But that smell that is now permeating my room is making this beer less and less drinkable by the minute. VERY light in the mouth. Feels like water going down, except the afterburps have a pukey flavor. Unyum.
Tried
from Can
on 02 Feb 2004
at 06:43
1.8/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 1
Texture 4
Overall 1
Yuck yuck yuck... why I tried this beer again is beyond me. I suppose I wanted to have one for an accurate review. Urinelike in appearance... really cheap smell. Smells like a trash can at a beer tent. Tastes like the beer from the bottom of that trash can was dumped into cans. Mouthfeel isn't awful... it's the best part of this "beer," but who wants this in their mouth? Undrinkable for me...
Tried
from Can
on 02 Feb 2004
at 06:42
3.4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
Very pale yellow... decent head, but I'm not impressed. I'm not sure what it is about cheap beers, but they all smell the same: cheap... so obviously, I am not impressed. Taste isn't awful, but it's not really good either. It's actually decent for a cheap, light beer. (especially one made by Miller) Mouthfeel is a bit thin by the halfway mark... doesn't seem to retain that first sip. I suppose, if you have a shitload of this in your fridge, and no doubt you cheap sons-of-bitches do, I'll drink some... but next time when you say to me, "Don't buy anything. I have beer," I'll know that's my cue to stop at the store.
Tried
on 02 Feb 2004
at 06:20
1.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
This is probably one of the worst ever... The Beast is known for making many appearances at college parties because of its price. But ever wonder why so many people get sick at college parties? I might point you back to The Beast. Nothing impressive about its appearance. The smell is awful, as is the taste.
Tried
on 02 Feb 2004
at 06:19
3.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
This isn't a terrible cheap beer... and a nice alternative to the run of the mill crap you buy when you're broke. Appearance and smell are nothing special; taste is not bad, but this is definitely not a "good" beer. Mouthfeel, well... it is a cheap beer. This is a drinkable beer if you're short on funds.
Tried
on 02 Feb 2004
at 06:01
2.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2
Draft, 1/26/04. Well, the "cold-filtering" produces something of a yeast bite, but after that, no real flavor at all. Just a generic, watery "beer-thingie." Smell is passable, but adjuncts are most prominent.
From can at Schaller’s Pump, Chicago South Side before the Sox upset of "Los Angeles." The only reason I took notes on this was because I couldn’t remember having reviewed it before. Same ol’ piss yellow pour, with a thin canned beer head. Okay, there’s something of a malt character here before it gets overwhelmed by corn. Not so much saccharine or cloying but like drinking from a cup smeared with lipstick. Empty barley pop.
From can at Schaller’s Pump, Chicago South Side before the Sox upset of "Los Angeles." The only reason I took notes on this was because I couldn’t remember having reviewed it before. Same ol’ piss yellow pour, with a thin canned beer head. Okay, there’s something of a malt character here before it gets overwhelmed by corn. Not so much saccharine or cloying but like drinking from a cup smeared with lipstick. Empty barley pop.
Tried
from Draft
on 26 Jan 2004
at 12:48
1.4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
Sweet maizesirup nose. Pale golden, no carbonation. Sweet corn taste. Watery. Sweet water, nothing more.
Tried
on 10 Jan 2004
at 14:32
2.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
Canned I was tired and thirsty, okay? Yet stuffed from dinner. MGD was all the host had, so I opted for the Light. Fridge was so cold, there was ice inside the can. Probably the best way to have this stuff. I actually could rate this higher since there was nothing terrible in its quiescently frozen state, but there was simply nothing there. No taste is better than bad taste, I suppose, so I won't leave it with a 0.5.
(Re-rated) I'm forced to give this a few more points because while this has no taste at all, I've found a beer that actually was offensive; although that was a bad bottle, not a beer that's bad by policy.
(Re-rated) I'm forced to give this a few more points because while this has no taste at all, I've found a beer that actually was offensive; although that was a bad bottle, not a beer that's bad by policy.
Tried
from Can
on 27 Oct 2003
at 08:40