Bières de Chimay (Abbaye de Scourmont)

Commercial Brewery in Baileux, Hainaut, Belgium 🇧🇪
Associated Venue: Chimay

Established in 1862

Contact
Route Charlemagne 8, Baileux, 6464, Belgium
Description
Chimay is an authentic Trappist beer: this means that it is brewed within the walls of a Trappist monastery, under the control and responsibility of the community of monks, who are involved through the process of making and marketing the beer. Most of the income generated by this activity is devoted to the needs of the community and social works.

The brewery was founded inside Scourmont Abbey, in the Belgian municipality of Chimay in 1862. Since the seventies the beer is transported from the monastery to the bottling plant 12 km away at Baileux, where also the cheese factory and a visitor center are located. The beer is then refermented in the bottle for three weeks before being shipped around the world. 50% of Chimay beer production is sold on the export markets. The brewing plant was updated in 1988.

     Show


5.6
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 6.5

Bottle:
A gusher; not much foam left to form a good head. Brown colour. Sweet aroma with notes of dark berries. Surprisingly thin body. Sweet and warming flavour with some notes of dark currants. Overrated IMHO.

Tried from Bottle on 06 Feb 2002 at 11:38


9.1
Appearance - 10 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 10 | Texture - 10 | Overall - 8.5

Pale amber, hazy rich head. Banana aroma. Lively and complex. Very flavourful and fruity. Peppery. This is an old favourite I have not sampled for far too long.

Tried on 25 Jan 2002 at 16:03


8.2
Appearance - 10 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8

Dark copper-coloured beer. Smells good, nice carbonation. I thought the blue was a little bit better, but the white cant cope with this excellent brune!

Tried from Can on 08 Sep 2001 at 08:38


9.2
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 10 | Flavor - 9 | Texture - 10 | Overall - 9

Re-rating as I recently tried it for the first time in quite awhile, and my palate has developed a bit since then. Also, I was quite mistaken in previously calling it a spicier version of the Red...its a different animal altogether. It is spicy though, along with plenty of malty sweetness, and some interesting smoky and licoricey notes. Aroma is sweet and malty. Poured with an amazing big rocky white head. Strong enough for you to really feel it.

Tried on 08 Mar 2001 at 23:27


6.8
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 7

Cloudy light brown (slight amber accent) with bone-coloured head. Aroma of raisin bread (candi sugar), brown sugar, plums, and a little nuttiness. Flavour starts sweet (apple pie, plum, raisin), picks up a bit of demerara accent, then turns more yeasty with a bit of dustiness and astringency late. Alcohol comes in at the end to dry it up.

Tried from Can on 26 Dec 2000 at 00:00


7.4
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 7.5

When I first had this beer, it was one of the first strong Belgians for me. It blew me away. Over the years, I’ve felt that while it is a complex, tasty beverage, it has been eclipsed. Whether it is me or the beer is debatable - and indeed the topic of the perceived decline of Chimay beers over the past decade is one of the most heated in the world of beer geeks. Well, I finally decided to sit down and give this a proper re-rate. I’ve got a small bottle of 2004 from my local liquor store.

The colour is kind of unusual in that there is a big disparity between the colour - under the light it’s a golden brown but in the glass it’s dark chestnut. The head is very light mocha. The aroma is plummy, slightly bubblegummy with notes of honey, pears, sweet dark malts and a little bit of yeast. Nice. It has a sweet palate with pear, orange, and sultana notes. A strong alcohol presence cuts through dusty yeastiness. Flavour notes are well-fused, save for the obtrusive alcohol.

Tried from Bottle on 25 Dec 2000 at 23:59


7.2
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7

Cloudy golden-amber Dusty yeast and ciabatta malts in the nose, tempered by a soft stryian earthiness and light pepper. Dry palate with just a hint of sweetness. Dusty yeast leads, followed by peppery alcohol. Moderate bitterness. Not bad for the style, and a fairly strong earthy hop character. Well-made and cohesive if somewhat short of scintillating.

Tried on 28 Nov 2000 at 21:16


7.4
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8.5

Nominally in the tripel style, but so tart as to be quite different than most other tripels I've tried. Aroma was pungent with green apples and fresh bread dough. Copper-tinted yellow, fairly cloudy with suspended yeast, heavily carbonated with large foamy head, and thick heavy lace clinging all the way down the glass. Head remained in bottom of glass. Flavor is initially tart with more green apples, and a yeasty sourdough presence. Finish is quite dry. Like others of its style, this beer works well at a variety of temps. When on the cold side, it has a tart refreshing crispness. I prefer less cool, more at cellar temps, where the light sweetness comes through, balancing the tartness.

Tried on 26 Apr 2000 at 13:41


8.5
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 9 | Flavor - 9 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 9

This is my original rating corresponding to a 4.8 score and a somewhat naive palate: A nearly flawless beer. One of my favorites of all time. Appropriately cloudy and brownish red. Fruity and spicy aroma. Rich flavor - hints of apple cider and other fruitiness. New rating, despite the warnings that this beer is on the decline it still has very far to go before it declines even into the "merely good" range. A really nice combination of fruitiness with a dash of spicy phenols and a sourdough yeasty finish, very well balanced and even in the mouth. Everything mixes well, nothing stands out, nothing is missing. A bit fizzy. It may not be a true 4.8 but its still one of the worlds great beers.

Tried on 26 Apr 2000 at 13:37