fiulijn (28382) reviewed Pale Pilsen from San Miguel 22 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 4
2005-02-12, 3-2-4-3-8=20
Blond color. Smell of plastic and alcohol, with the malt. Very common taste; strong bitterness; probably not bad if tasted in Asia…
2003-12-04, 2-2-3-2-6=15
Blond color. Bad corn aroma. Sweet taste, hay, corn. Watery final. Too poor.
Sloefmans (15389) reviewed San Mig Light 5% from San Miguel 22 years ago
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 1
Very pale gold. Thick bubbles to disparate head. Herbal, grassy. Probably a bit "skunked". Faugh! Water with an extract of overyear straw. Seen what I've tasted from Phillippine 'cuisine', I would have expected as much taste as possible, to wash down those infernal cookings. But it's rather the opposite. Unbelievable thin texture, like mineral water with added taste. This is truly horrible.
Clarkvv (16523) reviewed Dark Lager from San Miguel 22 years ago
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4.5
some head. Strong, pungent smell to it. Brownish color. Some sharp roasty alcohol notes that seem a little out of balance as the beer is only medium bodied. Beer packs a big punch and then dissipates. Little complexity, as I did not taste all of these different notes that have been mentioned, somewhat syrupy, but I have had much worse.
crit200 (5324) reviewed Dark Lager from San Miguel 23 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6
brown with fast fading head. Malt nose. Good carmel malt profile...........
omhper (44752) reviewed Red Horse Extra Strong from San Miguel 23 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 2 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 5
Pale yellow. Diesel and raw alcohol in the nose. Surprisingly the foul flavours in the nose are not carried on. It is surprisingly clean, has a soft mouthfeel and even a bit of bitterness. Granted this is no masterpiece, but I find it relatively drinkable.
Oakes (33493) reviewed Dark Lager from San Miguel 23 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 2 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 3
Dark brown, very sweet, caramelly. Crap dark lager.........................
omhper (44752) reviewed Pale Pilsen from San Miguel 23 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4
Pale golden. Medium bodied, some corn- or rice flavour, some bitterness. OK as a tropical lager.
Oakes (33493) reviewed San Miguel Premium Lager from San Miguel 24 years ago
Appearance - 2 | Aroma - 2 | Flavor - 2 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 1.5
Dull gold. Bland malt nose. Bland malt taste. Watery body. No particular finish. As nondescript as a beer gets.