Subsidiaries
3/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 1
Very pale gold. Thick bubbles to disparate head. Herbal, grassy. Probably a bit "skunked". Faugh! Water with an extract of overyear straw. Seen what I've tasted from Phillippine 'cuisine', I would have expected as much taste as possible, to wash down those infernal cookings. But it's rather the opposite. Unbelievable thin texture, like mineral water with added taste. This is truly horrible.
Tried
on 07 Sep 2003
at 07:09
4.6/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4.5
some head. Strong, pungent smell to it. Brownish color. Some sharp roasty alcohol notes that seem a little out of balance as the beer is only medium bodied. Beer packs a big punch and then dissipates. Little complexity, as I did not taste all of these different notes that have been mentioned, somewhat syrupy, but I have had much worse.
Tried
on 10 Jun 2003
at 15:15
6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 6
brown with fast fading head. Malt nose. Good carmel malt profile...........
Tried
on 25 Nov 2002
at 13:38
4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5
Pale yellow. Diesel and raw alcohol in the nose. Surprisingly the foul flavours in the nose are not carried on. It is surprisingly clean, has a soft mouthfeel and even a bit of bitterness. Granted this is no masterpiece, but I find it relatively drinkable.
Tried
on 21 Sep 2002
at 05:30
2.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 3
Dark brown, very sweet, caramelly. Crap dark lager.........................
Tried
on 30 May 2002
at 10:56
3.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 4
Pale golden. Medium bodied, some corn- or rice flavour, some bitterness. OK as a tropical lager.
Tried
on 20 Mar 2002
at 05:02
1.9/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
Dull gold. Bland malt nose. Bland malt taste. Watery body. No particular finish. As nondescript as a beer gets.
Tried
on 18 Mar 2001
at 10:49