Brouwerij Rodenbach
Commercial Brewery
in
Roeselare,
West Flanders,
Belgium 🇧🇪
Owned by
Brouwerij Palm
Associated Venue: Rodenbach
Established in 1821
Contact
Description
The Rodenbach family established the brewery in 1821 in the West Flemish town of Roeselare. The beer owes it unique quality and masterful character to the oak casks in which it matures. Rodenbach is the archetypical Flemish red-brown ale from West Flanders. Recognised as a regional product, it is probably the most award-winning beer in the world.
4.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5
Hazy dark red color, small pink head. Light aroma of cherry jam. Light taste, with some cherry jam, cherry candies, not particularly interesting.
Tried
from Can
on 22 Feb 2005
at 04:12
5.2/10
—
Appearance 10
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 2
Overall 5
Amber,small fast fading beige head. Plentiful tight bead.Astringent winey nose. Tart fizzy flavor. Poor balance in my opinion, as the acidity completely overpowers malt, and that isn’t the way it should be
Tried
on 21 Feb 2005
at 19:36
8/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 8
Flavor 8
Texture 8
Overall 8
Brought to MrFacto’s ’Tosa tasting by CaptainCougar. Clearish orange-red body, thin off-white head. Peculiar sweaty aroma with sour musty fruit and spices (a bit peppery). Sour, musty, moldy fruit flavor, sweaty, with pepper, cherries, and a leathery, somewhat salty finish. It’s like putting on the t-shirt you wore yesterday when you played basketball in 90 degree heat. You know, when sweat dinner plates appeared under your arms, but you didn’t stink because you wore Mitchum...without realizing that the bacteria might go to work on your shirt when you took it off the previous night. But that sounds pretty nasty, and this beer was very good. Go figure.
Tried
on 09 Jan 2005
at 23:23
8.4/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 9
Flavor 8
Texture 8
Overall 8.5
Hazy amber coloured body with a small white head. Aroma of pure tart cherries with a great sour scent...makes the mouth pucker without even taking a sip! Medium-bodied; Very tart taste with a great maltiness-not overpowering at all. Aftertaste shows a pleasant sweetness and a good finish to a great beer. Overall, this one was a very fine example of a flemish sour-tart but still showing some sweetness. Great to try...attempt to get your hands on this one! I sampled this 33 cL bottle at the November RB party at Founder’s in Alexandria, Virginia on 20-November-2004.
Tried
from Bottle
on 17 Dec 2004
at 22:25
5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 5
Bottle. Slightly sour aroma. Brown colour, light brown head. Flavour is acidic and sweet.
Tried
from Bottle
on 15 Dec 2004
at 17:06
7/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 7
Bottle from the shipment that hit the U.S. and Canadian shelves in 2004. Though I enjoyed it, I’m surprised it is as highly regarded as it is. I tried a bottle at the DC/MD/VA/WV gathering and a second bottle purchased from Whole Foods, later that week. The first sample was very appealing, but the second sample didn’t do as much for me. I think the heavy filtration and pasteurisation really suck the life out of this stuff and make it drinkable and refreshing, but not a tour de complexite, so to speak. I think that a general disdain for heavy filtration and often times even pasteurisation, is one of the characteristics that make Belgian beers so special and this just seems to work against that. It tends to get rather boring, and even a bit too sweet and syrupy as you drink more of it. Granted I havent tried the pre-palm bottles which are sitting in my basement. So I have nothing to which to compare. But I’ll try one soon.
Joris told me that Rodenbach Grand Cru was unfiltered/unpasteurised (can’t remember if it was both or just one) for a time back in the 70’s (if I recall correctly). That must have been some stuff! I would think this might be perhaps one of the greatest beers if I could only try a live, unfiltered sample. (note to self, go to the brewery and beg to be given a sample).
Joris told me that Rodenbach Grand Cru was unfiltered/unpasteurised (can’t remember if it was both or just one) for a time back in the 70’s (if I recall correctly). That must have been some stuff! I would think this might be perhaps one of the greatest beers if I could only try a live, unfiltered sample. (note to self, go to the brewery and beg to be given a sample).
Tried
from Bottle
on 22 Nov 2004
at 12:54
8/10
—
Appearance 10
Aroma 8
Flavor 8
Texture 8
Overall 7
First beer of the gathering. Not sure the date on this one (was it last made in 2000?) Bottle @ the Gathering. I believe Eyedrinkale or Jeffin7 brought this, not sure. Pours a dark ruddy orange/caramel color with some haziness perhaps?. Small beige head. Aroma is highly pungent: Cherries, wood, resinous earthy notes. Great intensity on the aroma as well, even after the bottle had sat open for some time. Flavor of cherry pits, more wood (oak,balsa, cedar) earth, lightly sour yeast. But overall, wow, this is surprisingly tame. I expected to be puckering my lips after this one. Moderately sweet, medium to medium-full body, sticky palate up front but light tingly carbonation, loosens the palate (not too much so). Lightly sweet toffee, maple and cherries mixed with citrus linger on the finish. Regardless of how old this bottle is, it is has aged very nicely and shows no oxidation or thinning. 9/4/8/4/17 Rerate from a bottle shared with Eyedrinkale in August 2005. This was the most full bodied, succulent, well-aged treat I’d had in a while. No syrupiness, not overly sweet. Perfectly sour and quenching with huge amounts of flavor and a long, lingering bacteria/musty/yeasty finish. Sour, but not TOO sour (if there is such a thing as too sour). Dry, vinegar and balsa/cedar notes, with light chocolate and prunes and brown sugar. Wonderful mouthfeel of tiny, tiny, bubbles popping in the mouth nicely. Out of this world! 9/4/10/5/19 Rating is an average of the three bottles I’ve had, though I’m tempted just to use the most recent. We’ll see how the next couple of bottles taste. Rerate from the new 750mL bottles. 2016 bottle drunk March 2022. Wow, this sucks. Cloying, not very complex, minimally sour. This is like a mediocre kettle sour. What a fucking joke. Fuck you, Rodenbach. Knocking down my overall rating.
Tried
from Bottle
on 21 Nov 2004
at 10:38
7.6/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 8
Flavor 8
Texture 6
Overall 8.5
ownBottle Pours a cloudy light brown like unfilterd cider. No real head but enough of a white ring to maintain nice lacing. Aromas are of swet and sour apples and pears. Flavors are quite tart but it works well with teh sweet fruit flavors. Finish is dry and feel is softly carbonated and unfiltered.
Tried
from Bottle
on 20 Nov 2004
at 02:15
7.2/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 8
Flavor 8
Texture 6
Overall 7
Clear amber coloured body-looks like a coke with a small tan head. Aroma of metal, cherries, caramel, raspberries & tart cranberries. Light-bodied; Tart cherry flavour with strong metal hints. Sweet, dry finish-very tart and enjoyable. Aftertaste makes mouth puckered and very clean feeling. Overall, very nice-metal is noticeable, but still damn good. I sampled this 33 cL botle purchased at a Bottle Shop in St. Kilda (Melbourne), Australia on 03-June-2004.
Tried
from Bottle
on 18 Oct 2004
at 21:51
7.6/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 9
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 7.5
2007 re-rate: I didn’t like this beer to begin with, but I knew it was special and have been tasting at least one bottle a year. I’m finally getting it, and really enjoyed a bottle last night. The flavour now feels like a wonderful refreshing sourness, and a powerful hop finish. Raised the score from 3.2 (high in aroma, low in flavour) to 3.8. Original 2004 rating: Dark red brown beer with a small off-white head. Big, complex aroma with lemon, berries (especially cherry), vanilla and a hint of vinegar. The flavour is still rich and complex, but with far too much acid for my taste. And I get unpleasant memories of fruit juices gone off and naturally fermented. I guess I have finally found a beer style that isn’t for me...
Tried
from Bottle
on 06 Sep 2004
at 16:34