Beerdevelopment Viven

Client Brewer in Sijsele, West Flanders, Belgium 🇧🇪

Established in 1999

Contact
Stationsstraat 89, Sijsele, 8340, Belgium
Description
In 2003, Tony Traen, took over Kapel van Viven from Willy De Lobel (the founder of Kapel van Viven) Since then, chapel of Viven has undergone several changes: a brand new look, an improved recipe for the Monastery of Viven and a new name. Chapel and Monastry of Viven were baptized Viven Blond and Viven Brown.

The idea to apply our Flemish brewing art to non-Flemish beers haunted Tony and together with Dirk Naudts (owner of the Proef brewery), he developed the recipes of the promising Viven Ale, Viven Porter, Viven Imperial IPA and Viven Master IPA. These exceptional beers, that would truly tempt any beer connoisseur, have been successfully launched onto the beer market in 2010, making them accessible to a wider audience of beer lovers.

For Tony and Krystle Traen, the driving forces behind the brewery, Viven has been a passion for over twenty years.

Krystle, one of the few female brewers in Belgium, is responsible for the taste of the different beers in the range. She composes the recipes and brews the first test batches in the kettles in Damme. When a new beer is tasted and approved by Krystle, the production moves to the Proefbrouwerij in Lochristi to be able to brew higher volumes. Tony is responsible for the administration, transport and sales. He started the Viven story, more than twenty years ago, in the little town of Vivenkapelle and turned it into an international brand.

     Show


6/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 6
Lichtgeel bier met schuim wat snel wegzakt. Smaak is bitter hoppig en fruitig met een romig mondgevoel en iets van citrus en tropisch fruit. Is een beetje waterig.
Tried from Bottle on 29 Feb 2020 at 13:01

6/10
Tried on 12 Feb 2020 at 13:34


6/10
Tried on 12 Feb 2020 at 13:33

6/10
Tried on 12 Feb 2020 at 13:33

5.8/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 5
Pours blonde, medium white head. Smell has no real hoparoma ( IPA ??? ) bit bready. Taste starts a bit bitter, than quickly fades in a sweet, wort-like, typical no alcohol base. Rather unpleasant. No hoparoma, at all. Use of citra hop ? how many cones ? Hyped up as ' the first No alcohol IPA ( which is far from the truth for multiple reasons ) but this is very shamefull as an attempt to an no-alcohol beer anno 2020, as well as both a style IPA and a beer from a brewery that used to make really good hoppy beers ( imperial remains a favorite from Belgium … )
Skip, avoid, replace, and move on...
Tried on 08 Feb 2020 at 17:30

4.6/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 4 Flavor 4 Texture 5 Overall 4
Rather good, fluffy white head, but not very carbonated clear golden beer. Spicy, but rather oppressive nose with lots of coriander. Coriander, bit peppery, but not much else. Well, nothing else. Feels better carbonated than it looks. Light body. Awful coriander soup.
Tried from Bottle on 05 Feb 2020 at 20:29

6/10
Top 5 non alcoholic beers. Maybe still a bit too sweet. But very nice and drinkable for 0, 3% abv.
Tried from Bottle on 02 Feb 2020 at 15:42

5.9/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 6 Flavor 5 Texture 6 Overall 5.5
Small greyish white head over copperish clear golden beer, with soft carbonation. Malt, sugar, but also a point of vinegar, pickles... Bit herbal rosemary or laurel. Sharpish flavour, sweet and herbal alike, acetic, herbs for sweet-and-sour. Caramel, syrup, but always with this sour edge. Mild carbonation, bit slick, seems not fully attenuated. I'm struggling to accept this was meant to be as such. Odd taste, off-flavour... certainly not going to have wide appeal.
Tried from Bottle on 28 Jan 2020 at 20:15

6.3/10 Appearance 7 Aroma 6 Flavor 6 Texture 7 Overall 6
Pours a bit unclear yellow. Big white head. Smell is sharp, yeasty, mild pine. no fruityness, no tropical aspect. Taste is sharp, tad dry, mild bitterness. Medium carbo. medium low bitterness. very thin bubbles, creating a somewhat 'creamy' experience, rather than a creamy malt base. More like a Brut IPA than a NEIPA, which this is a defiling excuse for . No hoparoma, no creamy maltybase, dry, and too bitter for a NEIPA. I see not 1 common feature between this beer, and what the style should be. Sigh…
Tried on 28 Jan 2020 at 12:31