Dortmunder Actien Brauerei (DAB)

Commercial Brewery in Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 🇩🇪
Owned by Radeberger Gruppe

Established in 1868

Contact
Steigerstraße 20, Dortmund, 44145, Germany

     Show


5.6
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 5.5

Can: Poured a golden yellow color pilsner with a quite large bubbly white head with average retention. Aroma of floral hops is enjoyable. Taste of malt is semi sweet with some subtle floral hops and a slightly bitter finish. This is a well-done and refreshing pilsner but really lacks character to make it truly enjoyable.

Tried from Can on 16 Oct 2006 at 09:55


2.2
Appearance - 2 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 2 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 2

Bottle. I think to myself, how bad can it be? Then I open it. Whoa doggies, for something that claims to be low-carb, it sure smells of sugar. Pours a very pale brown, like a whiskey and water with lots of melted ice. No head. Tastes like a non-alcohol beer; that sugary smell I mentioned is nowhere in the mouth. Might compare to a Malto Goya except for a harsh tinny taste. Some undiscernable bitterness is present somewhere. Yet I think this is exactly what the manufacturers… I mean brewers… intended. I think I’ll save the bottle for homebrew contest entries, so that at least it will have held beer at some point in its tragic life. Belch-h-h-h-hy, too.

Tried from Bottle on 27 Sep 2006 at 22:02


5.6
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5.5

Picked up in Morrisons Banbury recently. Pale golden in colour, white foamy head. Yeasty, malty aroma, which then moved to a very crisp and refreshing tasting beer although hardly exciting and a bit safe, which is fine if you want to drink a reasonable beer without having to think much about it.

Tried on 07 Sep 2006 at 01:41


5
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5

Oh dear, how to rate this. I used to get this alot, maybe 12 years ago, in cans, and always found it to be a nice solid lager with a firm hoppiness. But, I wasn’t very good at beer tasting back then and I’ve always resisted rating this from memory. So, spying it on the beer store shelf on a recent vacation, I couldn’t help grabbing a single bottle for a rating - also noticing it was a green one. I should’ve known, not just from the green glass, but from passing on all the Schlafly’s next to it that were clearly marked as out of date. Who know’s how long this one had been sitting in the light. Later that night, popping the cap in the hotel, the room immediately filled with a waft of skunk. Still, its not the store’s fault these guys use green glass. I let it sit for a bit and poured. The skunk settled down and I could get some light bready malts and maybe a cobwebby grassy hop. Flavor was clean and light, not watery, with just a touch of bready malt, some spiciness and a medium bitter finish. I still think this could be really nice if fresh and in a can like I used to get it. Nice golden color, if a bit bubbly, but poured a surprisingly creamy white head.

Tried from Can on 13 Aug 2006 at 23:25


5.8
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 6

Bottle: Hazy, golden to orangey coloured, smaller, creamy off-white head; medium fruity, perfumed nose (ripe berries, bananas, oranges), rather light bodied, delicate sweet flavour; mild fruity finish with a touch of tartness and sourness in the very end. Not unpleasant..........

Tried from Bottle on 28 Jul 2006 at 10:32


2.2
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 2 | Flavor - 2 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 2

Bottle. "Low Carb" = low taste. DAB original isn’t that great, but this one makes it a lot better.

Tried from Bottle on 24 Jul 2006 at 21:33


3.4
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 2.5

Bottle. Amber hue. Weak aroma, with a okay appearance. Ordinary is about as well as I can sum this one up.

Tried from Bottle on 24 Jul 2006 at 21:31


5.6
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5.5

(Canned) Colour is golden yellow, with a big frothy head, disappearing a bit too quick. Nose is malty and fresh, with detectable hints of grassy hops. Taste is malty, bready with a soft, balanced, grassy bitterness in the finish. Fairly dry, smooth and pleasant mouthfeel. Refreshing and well-made, but hardly exciting. A bit middle-of-the-road-ish. As stated, not really exciting, but I could have more than one on a sunny summer afternoon.

Tried from Can on 29 Jun 2006 at 15:35


6.6
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 7.5

Pours bright yellow into a shaker. Significant creamy, microbubble head billows above the glass. Skunky. Thin and almost without flavor -- but also without any bad flavor (and that’s a difference). Medium, dry finish. Would be quite refreshing on a warm day...

Tried from Can on 06 Jun 2006 at 20:26


5.2
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5

bottle - Okay, so there’s nothing original or terribly interesting about this beer. It has a light aroma with a little hops and some graininess. The flavor actually has a decent balance of malts and hops and the palate, while a little too thin, really isn’t bad. This beer is without a doubt a step up from Bud and most other pale lagers, but no more than that.

Tried from Bottle on 28 May 2006 at 02:07