Subsidiaries
3.4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Bottled (BB 10/2006).
Heavily marketed beer in the UK. Pale yellow color, small white head. A bit sweet corn-like aroma. Papery, sweetcorn flavor. Low carbonation, boring and uninspiring, not very drinkable.
Heavily marketed beer in the UK. Pale yellow color, small white head. A bit sweet corn-like aroma. Papery, sweetcorn flavor. Low carbonation, boring and uninspiring, not very drinkable.
Tried
from Bottle
on 18 Jan 2007
at 14:24
2.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
Can. yellow coilour with a white head. Aroma fruit, malt. Flavour is sweet, malt, fruit, hay.
Tried
from Can
on 14 Jan 2007
at 00:31
2.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 3
Bottled. Pale golden, small head. Bready and syrupy. Too sweet with mellow mouthfeel. As usual amongst commercial Brazilian beers no trace of hops, but then corn bread isn’t THAT bad a flavour. No bitterness.
Tried
from Bottle
on 28 Dec 2006
at 06:53
2.9/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Canned. Pale golden, airy head. Fruity pineapple aroma. Sweet with evident hay flavour and clean mouthfeel. Thankfully lacking that stick raisiny wort flavour often associated with N/As, instead it has traces of corn. No bitterness. A light flavoured non-awful commercial N/A.
Tried
from Can
on 28 Dec 2006
at 06:22
3.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 4
Bottled (Argentinian version by Quilmes). Dark ruby with rich airy head. Papery malt aroma. Sweetish and evidently caramelly with a touch of lingonberries. Medium bodied with clean mouthfeel. No bitterness. One dimensional and simplistic.
Tried
from Bottle
on 28 Dec 2006
at 01:40
2.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 3
Clear bottle, 355 ml, "gift" from Gilles from my woodworking class; eye: light straw, no head, no effervescence, clear; nose: light malt, corn, maple sap; mouth: really slight malt, finale in maple sap, lightly sweet, no bitterness, light body, thin; overall: cannot write it is a bad beer except that it does not taste much FRANÇAIS Bouteille transparente, 355 ml, « cadeau » de Gilles du cours d’ébénisterie; oeil : paille léger, pas de mousse, pas d’effervescence, claire; nez : malt léger, maïs, légère sève d’érable; bouche : très léger goût de malt, finale en eau d’érable, légèrement sucrée, aucune amertume, corps léger, texture mince, carbonatation moyenne; en résumé : on ne peut rien dire de mal sauf que ça ne goûte presque rien
Tried
from Bottle
on 17 Dec 2006
at 13:27
3/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
Bottle from Ralps, Palm Springs; Nose of malt and grain; clear gold with a small white head; corny flavor with a little light malt.
Tried
from Bottle
on 13 Dec 2006
at 23:05
4.1/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 3.5
A light golden beer with a huge white head. The aroma is almost non-existant. The flavor is very lightly malty with only the faintest bitterness. A very boring beer - though nothing wrong. Drink it in the sun for refreshment.
Tried
on 13 Dec 2006
at 15:39
4.3/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
Pours a golden amber with white head. Sweet grassy metallic aroma. Deep malt flavor.
Tried
on 13 Nov 2006
at 11:15
4.5/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5
I bought this beer off of a bunch of metalheads because I had nothing else to drink. It wasn’t too bad and it certainly tasted better than the Bud Light at the party that I was at. Pale color, pretty sweet actually. I didn’t think it was that bad, but under those conditions I could have been wrong.
Tried
on 31 Oct 2006
at 13:35