Subsidiaries
3/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 6
Overall 1
Why waste time money and effort brewing something like this? Come on! What is the point of a lager anyway. Most have no flavor and taste like ass. I think this is the last lager I ever rate. Unless I get one from a far away country.
Tried
on 02 May 2011
at 14:36
4.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
Bottle. Creamy white good mostly lasting head. Yellow colour. Light malty and hoppy aroma. Light bitter flavor. Short light bitter finish. Watery palate.
Tried
from Bottle
on 22 Apr 2011
at 23:41
3.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Bottle courtesy HenrikSoegaard. Nice head with good duration. Color is golden. Aroma and taste soap, lavender, citrus, butter and hops.
Tried
from Bottle
on 20 Apr 2011
at 05:27
4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 3
341 ml bottle. Pale golden/yellow body with a thin white head that fades. Light aroma of sweet malt, some fruit and a hint of honey. Flavor is light malty, relatively sweet, soft, some bitterness and the aftertaste feels a bit harsh. Rather boring and too sweet, not in balance.
Tried
from Bottle
on 15 Apr 2011
at 10:46
4.1/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 4
Flavor 3
Texture 6
Overall 3.5
Bottle. A clear, slightly yellowish, golden beer with a small, white head. Not much pale ale going on here, not much expected. Fruityness and pale malts. The flavor is much the same, more like a premium lager than a pale ale, lacking on most things, at least bitterness. Medium body. Not much interesting going on here. Well, it’s not undrinkable in any way, but it’s super boring. 110406
Tried
from Bottle
on 06 Apr 2011
at 11:14
3.9/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
Pale golden in colour. Quite fizzy, looks ok. This stinks of cooking (vegetable) oil. More sweetcorn and more vegetable oil on the taste. Sweetingly cloying on the front of the palate, texture also cloying, not very refreshing on the finish. Not great overall.
Tried
on 11 Mar 2011
at 05:15
4.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 3.5
Bottled from Bierzwerg. Golden color with medium white head. Nice lacing. Malty aroma with hints of spices. Taste, malt, honey, with bittersweet finish. Boring beer.
Tried
from Bottle
on 20 Feb 2011
at 08:42
5.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5.5
Originally rated August 2009. Not available in Ontario and Quebec (where it is easy for me to get beer - living between those two provinces), I had to try this one in New-Brunswick (where it is brewed). Nice to go on tour with the band, and to go to that province once again. Pours a pale yellow colour (like a light beer ??) with lots of carbonation, a big white foamy head that has decent retention and lots of lacing. The nose is pretty malty with a little sweetness. The malt seems lighter in the taste, with a little hop in the middle, mild apple in the finish and some corn in the aftertaste. Not much sweetness, maybe a touch in the start. Lots of lace left on the glass, way after drinking it. I remember not liking this beer many years back when I had it in N.B. but now, I do not mind it (for swill). Nothing really special, but goes down easy when playing music there in a bar.
Tried
on 16 Feb 2011
at 22:43
4.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 8
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 3
Originally rated September 2009. Bought this while on tour in New Brunswick. After Bud Light Lime making a popular statement in Canada this past summer, Moosehead decided to jump in on the light beer with lime. Pours a very pale yellow colour with a frothy white head that disappears slowly and leaves decent lacing. The nose is actually quite strong on the lime side. The taste is the opposite. Nothing. Loads of water, a little grain, a little lime juice and really, nothing much else. Very dull flavours. Did not like this one from the bottle (when purchased it) as you could not smell the good lime scent, but the taste is the same in both situation. Bland. Hardly existing. Preferred the Bud Light Lime.
Tried
from Can
on 16 Feb 2011
at 19:06
3.5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
WTF !! A light tasting lager under 100 calories... who wants that ?!??! Says slow-brewed and with one ingredient others don’t use: patience. I takes a lot of it to get through one, I tell you. Pours a very pale golden colour with lots of carbonation, a small white foamy head, medium retention and some thick patchy lacing. Aromas of light malt and maybe a little grass. Smooth mouthfeel, not as much watery as I would expect from a light beer like this one. Very mild grain taste with not much else. An unnecessary beer to brew.
Tried
on 16 Feb 2011
at 18:14