Martha's Exchange Restaurant & Brewing Company
Brewpub
in
Nashua,
New Hampshire,
United States 🇺🇸
Associated Venue: Marthas Exchange Restaurant and Brewing
Established in 1993
Contact
Description
Many of you have asked, and surely the rest of you have wondered, “Who is Martha”?
It all began with Katherine, the great aunt of Bill Fokas, when she immigrated from Greece to Nashua 84 years ago. In 1936, she founded the original Martha's Sweet Shoppe. She named it after the popular candy of that era known as “Martha Washington Candy”. The original store was only one tenth the size of the existing Martha’s.
In 1944, Bill’s father, James Fokas known to most as Mitch, came home from WWII and began running his Aunt’s candy shop. He soon expanded it to include a luncheonette with 28 stools; it quickly became the most popular lunch spot on Main Street. “Martha’s Sweet Shoppe and Luncheonette” was a landmark in Nashua for 50 years. Every political candidate that came to Nashua had to stop at Martha’s and they still do today. Many longtime residents and politicians planned Nashua’s future here at Martha’s. Mitch’s next expansion came with the addition of an extremely successful catering company which catered nearly every major function in the city for decades.
Mitch Fokas married Ethel Scontsas in 1959. They had three children who all grew up working for the family business. It was Bill who decided to take over in 1985 after he had graduated from college. He began working with a restoration team on a two year renovation of the Merchants Exchange building which consists of an entire block of Main Street. It was at this time that the luncheonette and candy shop transformed into “Martha’s Exchange”. In December 1988 he reopened; the first floor being a restaurant and bar, which was five times larger than the original diner. On the second floor he designed a large function hall that allowed them to cater on site, they even kept the Sweet Shoppe which helped to keep the nostalgia alive.
Five years later in 1993, Bill had the insight to capitalize on the excitement surrounding the hand crafted beer industry. That’s when he added Nashua’s first and only micro-brewery, doubling the size of the bar and adding 90 more seats. He also included a bar which was originally used in one of Al Capone’s speakeasies in Chicago.
Martha’s has grown and changed throughout the years and will continue to do so in the future in an effort to keep downtown Nashua alive and vibrant. It is our goal for all those who visit to enjoy a home-brewed beer, steak, burger, or simply a piece of candy, and leave with great memories.
It all began with Katherine, the great aunt of Bill Fokas, when she immigrated from Greece to Nashua 84 years ago. In 1936, she founded the original Martha's Sweet Shoppe. She named it after the popular candy of that era known as “Martha Washington Candy”. The original store was only one tenth the size of the existing Martha’s.
In 1944, Bill’s father, James Fokas known to most as Mitch, came home from WWII and began running his Aunt’s candy shop. He soon expanded it to include a luncheonette with 28 stools; it quickly became the most popular lunch spot on Main Street. “Martha’s Sweet Shoppe and Luncheonette” was a landmark in Nashua for 50 years. Every political candidate that came to Nashua had to stop at Martha’s and they still do today. Many longtime residents and politicians planned Nashua’s future here at Martha’s. Mitch’s next expansion came with the addition of an extremely successful catering company which catered nearly every major function in the city for decades.
Mitch Fokas married Ethel Scontsas in 1959. They had three children who all grew up working for the family business. It was Bill who decided to take over in 1985 after he had graduated from college. He began working with a restoration team on a two year renovation of the Merchants Exchange building which consists of an entire block of Main Street. It was at this time that the luncheonette and candy shop transformed into “Martha’s Exchange”. In December 1988 he reopened; the first floor being a restaurant and bar, which was five times larger than the original diner. On the second floor he designed a large function hall that allowed them to cater on site, they even kept the Sweet Shoppe which helped to keep the nostalgia alive.
Five years later in 1993, Bill had the insight to capitalize on the excitement surrounding the hand crafted beer industry. That’s when he added Nashua’s first and only micro-brewery, doubling the size of the bar and adding 90 more seats. He also included a bar which was originally used in one of Al Capone’s speakeasies in Chicago.
Martha’s has grown and changed throughout the years and will continue to do so in the future in an effort to keep downtown Nashua alive and vibrant. It is our goal for all those who visit to enjoy a home-brewed beer, steak, burger, or simply a piece of candy, and leave with great memories.
6.6/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 6.5
On tap-foamy offwhite-cloudy yellow. A-when cold, a bit of. Sweet hay with taste following. As it warmed the spiciness and some lt fruit came out.
Tried
from Draft
on 09 Oct 2017
at 14:15
6.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 7.5
Cask at Cask and Vine 300 Pints Fest Sweet bready malt with bits of diacetyl. Tart orange and currant with bits of grassy earthy hops. Decent cask beer
Tried
from Cask
on 21 May 2017
at 16:30
7.9/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 8
Flavor 8
Texture 8
Overall 7.5
Are you a BJCP judge? Well, have fun rating this one. My take on this is based on observations due to the fact that I don’t want my face slapped as this one seemed to want to slap those who rate to style in the face.
Here goes nothing:
The appearance was a dark brown close to black color with a finger’s worth of light tan foamy head that fell off at a good pace. Light stringy lace.
The aroma had some roasted dark malts, sweet dark fruits, earthy to grassy hops, dark bread sweetness and then the Belgian yeast shows up which makes this one all the more fun. Yes to the spiciness and the sweetness that this yeast created.
The flavor was all of what the previously mentioned one said - the spicy, the sweet of a couple different components (dark fruit, dough, and dark bread and cake). The aftertaste copied all of those flavors and bled into a semi-sticky sort of sweet and spicy finish.
The feel was medium bodied with a good sipping quality about it. The stickiness was fairly contained as some of the spiciness and the carbonation seemed to conglomerate enough to pull it all together.
Overall, sure glad I’m not one of those cicerone types of people or one of those BJCP judges, as I’m sure this one somewhat leaves them a bit boggled. Me, I know I did but at the same time, said to myself \"self, ah, screw rating to style,\" I’m just gonna get my face slapped thinking about it too much. Just drink this and enjoy it.
Here goes nothing:
The appearance was a dark brown close to black color with a finger’s worth of light tan foamy head that fell off at a good pace. Light stringy lace.
The aroma had some roasted dark malts, sweet dark fruits, earthy to grassy hops, dark bread sweetness and then the Belgian yeast shows up which makes this one all the more fun. Yes to the spiciness and the sweetness that this yeast created.
The flavor was all of what the previously mentioned one said - the spicy, the sweet of a couple different components (dark fruit, dough, and dark bread and cake). The aftertaste copied all of those flavors and bled into a semi-sticky sort of sweet and spicy finish.
The feel was medium bodied with a good sipping quality about it. The stickiness was fairly contained as some of the spiciness and the carbonation seemed to conglomerate enough to pull it all together.
Overall, sure glad I’m not one of those cicerone types of people or one of those BJCP judges, as I’m sure this one somewhat leaves them a bit boggled. Me, I know I did but at the same time, said to myself \"self, ah, screw rating to style,\" I’m just gonna get my face slapped thinking about it too much. Just drink this and enjoy it.
Tried
on 13 May 2017
at 13:56
7.6/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 8
Texture 8
Overall 7.5
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a semi-hazy burnt dark orange to almost amber color with a finger’s worth of white foamy head. Moderate lace.
The aroma had some citrus pulp sweetness and a light earthy spice (somewhat like nutmeg?). Some sweet dough at the end.
The flavor was moderately sweet with a touch of clean spices, can’t really tell what kind of spice (maybe that nutmeg, not sure). Aftertaste was the sweet doughy malts and citrus. Sticky sort of sweet finish.
The feel was between light and medium bodied with a fair sessionability about it. Mild carbonation and good ABV.
Overall, well, I didn’t really see it as a saison at the time of drinking this but it was quite enjoyable when I had it.
The appearance was a semi-hazy burnt dark orange to almost amber color with a finger’s worth of white foamy head. Moderate lace.
The aroma had some citrus pulp sweetness and a light earthy spice (somewhat like nutmeg?). Some sweet dough at the end.
The flavor was moderately sweet with a touch of clean spices, can’t really tell what kind of spice (maybe that nutmeg, not sure). Aftertaste was the sweet doughy malts and citrus. Sticky sort of sweet finish.
The feel was between light and medium bodied with a fair sessionability about it. Mild carbonation and good ABV.
Overall, well, I didn’t really see it as a saison at the time of drinking this but it was quite enjoyable when I had it.
Tried
from Can
on 13 May 2017
at 13:34
6.6/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 6
Flavor 6
Texture 8
Overall 6.5
Reviewed from notes. The appearance was a nice looking golden yellow color with a finger and a half’s worth of white foamy head that fell off at a moderate pace. Some stringy lace.
The aroma had some doughy sweet malts, light grassy hoppiness. and a little bit of wood.
The flavor was fairly sweet and crisp with no aftertaste and a moderately clean performing sweet sort of aftertaste and finish.
The palate was light bodied with a pretty good sessionability about it. ABV felt appropriate.
Overall, the caption doesn’t match the style that’s given here nor even matches the aromas, flavors and feels of this beer. However, I’m looking at my notebook and seeing that this is the same name as what I got in this entry on ratebeer. It’s not an English IPA nor an ESB, this is more of a golden ale in my opinion. But whatever, I move on.
The aroma had some doughy sweet malts, light grassy hoppiness. and a little bit of wood.
The flavor was fairly sweet and crisp with no aftertaste and a moderately clean performing sweet sort of aftertaste and finish.
The palate was light bodied with a pretty good sessionability about it. ABV felt appropriate.
Overall, the caption doesn’t match the style that’s given here nor even matches the aromas, flavors and feels of this beer. However, I’m looking at my notebook and seeing that this is the same name as what I got in this entry on ratebeer. It’s not an English IPA nor an ESB, this is more of a golden ale in my opinion. But whatever, I move on.
Tried
on 13 May 2017
at 13:26
6.8/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 6
Texture 8
Overall 6
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a semi-clear gold color with a slight transparency about it. Sly film of a little white head slid off pretty quick to leave no lace.
The aroma had some white pepper, light Belgian yeasty/breadiness and some citrus pulp sweetness.
The flavor leaned into the sweetness at first and then developed a slight little peppery note to it. Mild aftertaste of the citrus sweetness and yeastiness. Brisk clean semi-sweet finish.
The feel was between light and medium bodied with a stable sessionability about it. Carbonation felt low but didn’t bother me. ABV felt appropriate.
Overall, decent Americanized witbier that’s easy to drink and throw back on hot days.
The appearance was a semi-clear gold color with a slight transparency about it. Sly film of a little white head slid off pretty quick to leave no lace.
The aroma had some white pepper, light Belgian yeasty/breadiness and some citrus pulp sweetness.
The flavor leaned into the sweetness at first and then developed a slight little peppery note to it. Mild aftertaste of the citrus sweetness and yeastiness. Brisk clean semi-sweet finish.
The feel was between light and medium bodied with a stable sessionability about it. Carbonation felt low but didn’t bother me. ABV felt appropriate.
Overall, decent Americanized witbier that’s easy to drink and throw back on hot days.
Tried
from Can
on 13 May 2017
at 11:22
6.4/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 5
Texture 6
Overall 6.5
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a fairly dark red almost brown color with a cap of a little white head. Sly messy lace.
The aroma seemed similar to the other red ale I had but this one was different because it had a bit more of grassy hops and then a slight herbal quality came about.
The flavor leaned towards the herbal tones at first and brought about the earthy and grassy hops to come in between and chunk up the malts. There’s that separation I tend to speak about often in my reviews of beers of how they don’t blend right. This is one of those beers. Aftertaste was chunky between the malts and the hops. Finish was lean with the malts.
The feel was about medium bodied with a slight sessionability about it. Good carbonation and the ABV felt fine.
Overall, pretty decent for an Irish red ale. Some day, I hope brewers will learn to blend the beer fully. I already know some who do, but I do wish more would do this practice.
The appearance was a fairly dark red almost brown color with a cap of a little white head. Sly messy lace.
The aroma seemed similar to the other red ale I had but this one was different because it had a bit more of grassy hops and then a slight herbal quality came about.
The flavor leaned towards the herbal tones at first and brought about the earthy and grassy hops to come in between and chunk up the malts. There’s that separation I tend to speak about often in my reviews of beers of how they don’t blend right. This is one of those beers. Aftertaste was chunky between the malts and the hops. Finish was lean with the malts.
The feel was about medium bodied with a slight sessionability about it. Good carbonation and the ABV felt fine.
Overall, pretty decent for an Irish red ale. Some day, I hope brewers will learn to blend the beer fully. I already know some who do, but I do wish more would do this practice.
Tried
on 12 May 2017
at 17:18
7.2/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 8
Overall 7
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a cloudy red to brown color with a film of a little white head. Subtle stringy lace.
The aroma had some caramel/toffee malts and some earthy hops.
The flavor cued up those malts fairly sweet to linger with the earthy hop bitterness. Became somewhat dry with a touch of roast in the aftertaste and followed through in the finish.
The feel was just a tad under than medium bodied with a pretty good sessionability about it. Good carbonation and the ABV felt appropriate.
Overall, pretty good amber ale that I could have again.
The appearance was a cloudy red to brown color with a film of a little white head. Subtle stringy lace.
The aroma had some caramel/toffee malts and some earthy hops.
The flavor cued up those malts fairly sweet to linger with the earthy hop bitterness. Became somewhat dry with a touch of roast in the aftertaste and followed through in the finish.
The feel was just a tad under than medium bodied with a pretty good sessionability about it. Good carbonation and the ABV felt appropriate.
Overall, pretty good amber ale that I could have again.
Tried
on 12 May 2017
at 17:11
7.4/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 8
Overall 7.5
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a ruddy burnt amber close to brown in color with a finger’s worth of white foamy head that slid into the beer at a decent pace. Lace slid with the sips.
The aroma had a nice soft sweet roasty nuttiness rolling all about some caramel/toffee malts. Some chocolate and then some earthiness.
The flavor leaned towards the sweet side and letting the hoppiness escape into oblivion. It’s all about the malts in this one which leads into the aftertaste and finish.
The feel was about medium bodied with a fair sessionability about it. Carbonation felt fine. ABV felt fine as well.
Overall, I wonder how many brown ales I actually have shoved down my throat over the years. Quite interesting the more I find in this book my buddy in New York sent me. Well, I guess I’ll be uploading the rest of these soon enough.
The appearance was a ruddy burnt amber close to brown in color with a finger’s worth of white foamy head that slid into the beer at a decent pace. Lace slid with the sips.
The aroma had a nice soft sweet roasty nuttiness rolling all about some caramel/toffee malts. Some chocolate and then some earthiness.
The flavor leaned towards the sweet side and letting the hoppiness escape into oblivion. It’s all about the malts in this one which leads into the aftertaste and finish.
The feel was about medium bodied with a fair sessionability about it. Carbonation felt fine. ABV felt fine as well.
Overall, I wonder how many brown ales I actually have shoved down my throat over the years. Quite interesting the more I find in this book my buddy in New York sent me. Well, I guess I’ll be uploading the rest of these soon enough.
Tried
on 02 May 2017
at 21:11
7.2/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 8
Overall 7
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a light hazy orange to brown color with a slight carbonation seen rising to fill a bar pour’s kind of slim white head. Soft sliding lace.
The aroma blended some caramel malts to some apple crisp sweetness. Touch of nuts at the end.
The flavor leaned to the sweet side with the apples melding into the caramel malts. Aftertaste was all about the apples and caramel. Finish was quick and malty.
The feel was about medium bodied, maybe a tad under. Sessionability was there and the ABV felt good despite almost being in the \"imperial\" range. I can agree with what the brewer projected.
Overall, it was a little bit like drinking a caramel covered apple. I think that’s what the brewer wanted, maybe. But I didn’t ask that day. Next time, I will.
The appearance was a light hazy orange to brown color with a slight carbonation seen rising to fill a bar pour’s kind of slim white head. Soft sliding lace.
The aroma blended some caramel malts to some apple crisp sweetness. Touch of nuts at the end.
The flavor leaned to the sweet side with the apples melding into the caramel malts. Aftertaste was all about the apples and caramel. Finish was quick and malty.
The feel was about medium bodied, maybe a tad under. Sessionability was there and the ABV felt good despite almost being in the \"imperial\" range. I can agree with what the brewer projected.
Overall, it was a little bit like drinking a caramel covered apple. I think that’s what the brewer wanted, maybe. But I didn’t ask that day. Next time, I will.
Tried
from Can
on 02 May 2017
at 20:59