Martha's Exchange Restaurant & Brewing Company
Brewpub
in Nashua,
New Hampshire,
United States 🇺🇸
Associated Venue: Marthas Exchange Restaurant and Brewing
Established in 1993
It all began with Katherine, the great aunt of Bill Fokas, when she immigrated from Greece to Nashua 84 years ago. In 1936, she founded the original Martha's Sweet Shoppe. She named it after the popular candy of that era known as “Martha Washington Candy”. The original store was only one tenth the size of the existing Martha’s.
In 1944, Bill’s father, James Fokas known to most as Mitch, came home from WWII and began running his Aunt’s candy shop. He soon expanded it to include a luncheonette with 28 stools; it quickly became the most popular lunch spot on Main Street. “Martha’s Sweet Shoppe and Luncheonette” was a landmark in Nashua for 50 years. Every political candidate that came to Nashua had to stop at Martha’s and they still do today. Many longtime residents and politicians planned Nashua’s future here at Martha’s. Mitch’s next expansion came with the addition of an extremely successful catering company which catered nearly every major function in the city for decades.
Mitch Fokas married Ethel Scontsas in 1959. They had three children who all grew up working for the family business. It was Bill who decided to take over in 1985 after he had graduated from college. He began working with a restoration team on a two year renovation of the Merchants Exchange building which consists of an entire block of Main Street. It was at this time that the luncheonette and candy shop transformed into “Martha’s Exchange”. In December 1988 he reopened; the first floor being a restaurant and bar, which was five times larger than the original diner. On the second floor he designed a large function hall that allowed them to cater on site, they even kept the Sweet Shoppe which helped to keep the nostalgia alive.
Five years later in 1993, Bill had the insight to capitalize on the excitement surrounding the hand crafted beer industry. That’s when he added Nashua’s first and only micro-brewery, doubling the size of the bar and adding 90 more seats. He also included a bar which was originally used in one of Al Capone’s speakeasies in Chicago.
Martha’s has grown and changed throughout the years and will continue to do so in the future in an effort to keep downtown Nashua alive and vibrant. It is our goal for all those who visit to enjoy a home-brewed beer, steak, burger, or simply a piece of candy, and leave with great memories.
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6.5
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a fairly dark red almost brown color with a cap of a little white head. Sly messy lace.
The aroma seemed similar to the other red ale I had but this one was different because it had a bit more of grassy hops and then a slight herbal quality came about.
The flavor leaned towards the herbal tones at first and brought about the earthy and grassy hops to come in between and chunk up the malts. There’s that separation I tend to speak about often in my reviews of beers of how they don’t blend right. This is one of those beers. Aftertaste was chunky between the malts and the hops. Finish was lean with the malts.
The feel was about medium bodied with a slight sessionability about it. Good carbonation and the ABV felt fine.
Overall, pretty decent for an Irish red ale. Some day, I hope brewers will learn to blend the beer fully. I already know some who do, but I do wish more would do this practice.
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a cloudy red to brown color with a film of a little white head. Subtle stringy lace.
The aroma had some caramel/toffee malts and some earthy hops.
The flavor cued up those malts fairly sweet to linger with the earthy hop bitterness. Became somewhat dry with a touch of roast in the aftertaste and followed through in the finish.
The feel was just a tad under than medium bodied with a pretty good sessionability about it. Good carbonation and the ABV felt appropriate.
Overall, pretty good amber ale that I could have again.
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7.5
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a ruddy burnt amber close to brown in color with a finger’s worth of white foamy head that slid into the beer at a decent pace. Lace slid with the sips.
The aroma had a nice soft sweet roasty nuttiness rolling all about some caramel/toffee malts. Some chocolate and then some earthiness.
The flavor leaned towards the sweet side and letting the hoppiness escape into oblivion. It’s all about the malts in this one which leads into the aftertaste and finish.
The feel was about medium bodied with a fair sessionability about it. Carbonation felt fine. ABV felt fine as well.
Overall, I wonder how many brown ales I actually have shoved down my throat over the years. Quite interesting the more I find in this book my buddy in New York sent me. Well, I guess I’ll be uploading the rest of these soon enough.
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a light hazy orange to brown color with a slight carbonation seen rising to fill a bar pour’s kind of slim white head. Soft sliding lace.
The aroma blended some caramel malts to some apple crisp sweetness. Touch of nuts at the end.
The flavor leaned to the sweet side with the apples melding into the caramel malts. Aftertaste was all about the apples and caramel. Finish was quick and malty.
The feel was about medium bodied, maybe a tad under. Sessionability was there and the ABV felt good despite almost being in the \"imperial\" range. I can agree with what the brewer projected.
Overall, it was a little bit like drinking a caramel covered apple. I think that’s what the brewer wanted, maybe. But I didn’t ask that day. Next time, I will.
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a semi-rugged somewhat dark amber almost brown color with a finger’s worth of white foamy head. Slight lace.
The aroma had some caramel/toffee malts, some nuts and some Belgian yeasty/breadiness. Light raisin.
The flavor leaned towards the sweet side suffocating the spiciness mostly. Aftertaste was somewhat sweet with the same sort of finish.
The feel was about medium bodied with a fair sessionability about it. Light carbonation. ABV felt fine.
Overall, pretty good brown ale, but seems somewhat like a Belgian brown ale, and not a sour one. Interesting, perhaps again when/if I could find it.
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4.5
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a clear amber color with a decent sized frothy white head. Slight messy lace.
The aroma had some caramel, toast and some grassy and earthy hops.
The flavor leans towards the sweet side of the malts and keeps the toast fairly up front. Light spice shows up. Aftertaste seemed trying. It was somewhat like cake with grass in it, wasn’t exactly pleasant. Finish was quick and somewhat malty.
The feel was about light bodied. Carbonation seemed fine. ABV seemed there. Seemed to scrape at my tongue a little bit.
Overall, odd altbier, not so sure about this one as the aftertaste seemed all wrong and the feel was a bit rugged. Also, missing some German yeasty effects.
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance was a semi-dark red/slightly brown color with a sly film of a tan head. Sly messy lace.
The aroma had some sweet malts, earthy hops, candy sugar, raisins/plums, and touches some light spices - somewhat like ginger but slightly like allspice.
The flavor leans towards the sweet side through the previously mentioned aromas. Mostly sweet aftertaste of the sugars and raisins/plums. Sweet malty finish.
The feel was about medium bodied with a fair grip on my tongue, between sessionable and sipping quality. Good carbonation and the ABV felt fine.
Overall, Belgian strong ale or English strong ale? Some sort of odd combination or perhaps the brewer’s creative take on this one. I’m not sure, maybe again.
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7
Reviewed from notes.
The appearance wasn’t as dark as I had hoped for in a normal brown ale, seemed closer to copper, more or less. Still, a finger’s worth of white foamy head sat atop and fell off at a decent pace. Light lace.
The aroma had some sweet caramel/toffee malts, light nuts and some toast.
The flavor was basically the same. Light aftertaste of the malts and finish.
On the palate, this one sat about a light to medium on the body with a pretty good sessionability about it. Good smoothness all about.
Overall, mostly good brown ale, or should I say \"copper ale?\" I’m not worried, aromas and flavors brought this one up for me.
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7.5
Reviewed from notes.
Is this an Imperial Brown ale, judging from the ABV and that I had it served in a snifter? Not sure, but here’s the rest.
The appearance was a dark brown pour with an off white foamy little head. Some lace.
The aroma had some caramel/nutty to some slight toffee malts. Subtle coffee beans.
The flavor had some big sweet malts rolling all over my taste buds. Light milk chocolate came about as it warmed. Malty aftertaste and finish.
The feel was medium bodied with a fair sipping quality about it. ABV felt fine.
Overall, pretty good brown ale well worthy of having again.
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7.5
Tap at the source. Hazy deep yellow color with a long lasting bubbly off white head. Light clove and banana with rich sweet bread and plenty of earthy citrus and spicy hops to counter. My dad had two and I thought it was pretty good too!