Subsidiaries
3.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
probably one of the better ice beers. Not much to say. too much alcohol taste for my liking. just your average canadian bar beer.
Tried
from Can
on 10 Jul 2002
at 07:09
3.1/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
this is a decent light beer, but i still cant escape that malty, meaty alcohol taste this brewery seems to put in all of its beers.
Tried
from Can
on 10 Jul 2002
at 07:08
3/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2
has a nasty malty/alchol taste that makes for a terrible hangover. dont like this beer, id even drink bud over it.
Tried
on 10 Jul 2002
at 07:07
5.6/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 5
Flavor 6
Texture 4
Overall 5.5
I was impressed with the lovely reddish-brown colour of this beer. This all-malt beer also contains some peated malt, perhaps just enough to give it a woody dryness. Crystal malts also make an appearance and the beer does, to its credit, transcend the typical mainstream lager with slight modifications character of so many big brewery attempts at craft beers
Tried
on 26 Apr 2002
at 16:36
2.9/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
May be fuller and fruitier than a regular blond, but does not bear any resemblance to a true Belgian-style product
Tried
on 26 Apr 2002
at 16:35
3.1/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 2
Overall 3.5
Full golden-amber colour, a slightly oily character, faint malt accent, some corn syrup sweetness - no real sign of those Hersbrucker hops, though.
Tried
on 26 Apr 2002
at 16:34
1.5/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 1
Wanna-be Keith's. Now that's setting your sights high.......................
Tried
on 26 Apr 2002
at 16:33
4.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5
Mild-tasting, but with a pleasing dark malt palate. I'm not sure that 'massive' is the operative word.
Tried
on 26 Apr 2002
at 16:33
1.9/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 1.5
Every bit as bad as you'd expect............................................
Tried
on 26 Apr 2002
at 16:32
3.4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
For me, this was just one of those beers I didn't want to try because it just looks like it's going to be bad. Maybe it's the pseudo-generic labeling, who knows. Either way this was not very good. Crispness was about all it had going for it.
Tried
on 18 Mar 2002
at 00:30