Subsidiaries
4.1/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4.5
Bottled(500ml). -Pours a pale yellow colour with medium sized airy white head and cereal nose. Slight malty and bready aroma with notes of vegetables and hay. Also some light dusty and bitter hop notes in the finish.
Tried
from Bottle
on 11 Jul 2007
at 06:50
2.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 2
Overall 3
Canned(500ml). -Golden coloured, small soapy head, alcoholic nose. Sweet malty and faint hoppy aroma with sharp sweet finish. Awfully sweet.
Tried
from Can
on 11 Jul 2007
at 06:44
4.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 5
Bottled(500ml). -pale golden coloured, medium sized white head, lively carbonation, fruity (apple) nose. The aroma is malty, fresh hoppy and bready with lemony notes in the finish. Dry aftertaste.
Tried
from Bottle
on 23 May 2007
at 04:21
3.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 3
Flavor 4
Texture 6
Overall 2
Pour is a bright yellow with a white head. Aroma is soapy and sweet. Flavor is chalky and bitter with nothing really else going on. Just a boring lager with nothing going on. I’m a sucker for eastern euro beer.
Tried
on 04 May 2007
at 16:48
4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
0.5l can courtesy of ozujsko (thanks!) Enormous thick white head that went away at a medium pace on top of a yellow body. Lively carbonation. The nose is a bit sharp, pineapple and dusty hops. The taste is a bit acidic-lemony with a stale bready malty background mixing with some corny dust and metal. A bit sulphuric, but still somewhat interesting and better than I thought it’d be.
Tried
from Can
on 28 Apr 2007
at 14:52
3.5/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 4
Well, what can I say. If i were in Romania, i would probably drink this beer. It’s not that bad, though the smell is not really good. But at least it is drinkable. I’m glad Noize brought the premium, because I don’t know if i’d survived the regular pils ;-)
Tried
from Can
on 09 Mar 2007
at 06:04
2.6/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
Canned. Clear pale yellow. Aroma of pea soup. Sweet and fruity, medium bodied with notes of boiled vegetables. No bitterness. A poor industrial lager, indistiguishable from the likes of Heineken.
Tried
from Can
on 20 Feb 2007
at 04:44
4/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 4
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
Dark-golden, clear beer with a good, off-white head, slightly irregular. Indeed quite alcoholic nose, as some grain-alcohol, a bit sweet, with a dry grain-spices aroma. Extremely raw-alcoholic initial taste, going on towards a sweet pastry-like flavour, slightly spiced. The discrepancy between the, after all modest 7% and the raw spirit character, makes me really think of added ethanol. Alcoholburn, adstringency, medium bodied at best, but syrupy impression. Could vie with the worst malt likkers.
Tried
on 21 Aug 2006
at 13:48
2.9/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 2
Texture 4
Overall 2.5
Hmm, well, there’s good and there’s bad. Pours a very pale golden, but its not quite straw pale. Fluffy pitted head. Aroma is off, with yeasty/doughy notes first, followed by mild vegetal and olive notes, maybe a touch of corn of other sweet adjunct. Initially sweet, a little cloying, also tart/astringent. Some bitterness comes through in the end, but it doesn’t meld with the rest of the beer. Lingering sulfuriness. Watery but almost soft palate. Bottle dated 7/5/06 (May 7th?) - don’t know if that’s a best by date or what, if so its 1-3 months past it.
Tried
from Bottle
on 14 Aug 2006
at 19:20
5.1/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5.5
Creamy, white, mid-sized head over clear yellow body with some ongoing carbonation. Faint, bready aroma with grassy notes, a little alcohol, and a touch of candy. Light, sweetish taste of mealy malts, somewhat watery, with grassy notes; aftertaste is a slightly chalky, faintly bitterness. Not bad, but not very remarkable, either. (0.5l bottle, five days after the best-before date.)
Tried
from Can
on 23 Apr 2006
at 15:07