Royal
Commercial Brewery
in Manchester,
Greater Manchester,
England 🏴
Owned by
Heineken UK
Established in 1875
stevoj (18327) reviewed Fosters (UK) from Royal 12 years ago
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 2 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 2.5
Bleh! Bad, bad, bad. Decent looking beer with thick head, but smell, taste and palate are terrible. If I wasn’t thirsty, this might rate as a drain pour.
laiti (11645) reviewed Fosters (UK) from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 2.5
Draught @ Tivoli, Tampere. Rated on 25.04.2012
Stale and swet aroma with corn, some metal and grainy malt. Flavour is sweet and slightly stale with corn, hay, hints of grainy malt and metal. Bulky and too sweet.
danlo (13133) reviewed Fosters (UK) from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 3.5
568ml pint tinny (i.e. can), chilled and poured into a pint glass. Clear light golden amber colour, initial large frothy white head that diminishes leaving lots of lacing and aroma of malt., grain, cardboard. Taste is malt, syrup, grain, grass, slight sweetness and a hint of bitterness. Thin bodied, medium carbonation, bland flavour, one for drinking cold.
Harrisoni (26233) reviewed Fosters Gold from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4.5
Bottle at Chriso New Year 2012/13. Bottle from Leighton clear gold. cardboard aroma. some hop lemon actually not that bad
Jamesie1857 (4455) reviewed Fosters Gold from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 3
330ml bottle - it was a bottle, I was on a football bus, it was lager. What more do I need to offer. Rank.
Leighton (34941) reviewed Fosters Gold from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 10 | Overall - 8.5
Bottle at home in London. Pours clear, yellow-gold with a small, white foam head. Some lightly sugary pale malts in the nose, subtle dough, straw. Light sweet flavor, mellow straw bitterness, a bit more light dough malts. Light bodied with average carbonation. Crisp, clean finish with a very restrained character overall, just nips of dry straw and faint, white sugar and dough. Quite a nice little pale lager, this. Exactly what I want after a strenuous gym session.
BlackHaddock (17284) reviewed Fosters Gold from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 2.5
Third and final beer in my 28th September 2012 ’Dodgy Lager tasting evening’. 300ml Clear bottle: best before the end of Mar 2013. Dry, bitter, metallic, boring and lager looking: no smell. The worst of the pilsner/lagers I had during the tasting; I must thank my daughter for finding such delights for me (this and one each from the cheap German based supermarkets Aldi and Lidl). She tries to find beers I’ve never reviewed before, but sometimes she does things like this, just to test my love!
Jamesie1857 (4455) reviewed Fosters (UK) from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4.5
A golden clear chill-fest, on a hot day (with no choice) not something to get all berr-snobbish about. Better than a coke.
Olut (21769) reviewed Fosters Twist from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4
Fairly bad citrus spin-off from what is already a terrible tasting lager beer.
Grzesiek79 (7624) reviewed Fosters (UK) from Royal 13 years ago
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 3 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 2.5
barnyard, floral, nuts, caramel, rotten eggs, pale, clear, frothy, medium sweetness, lightly bitter, medium sourness, medium body, thin feel,