Brooklyn Brewery

Microbrewery in Brooklyn, New York, United States 🇺🇸
Owned by Carlsberg Group International Head Office
Associated with 2 Venues

Established in 1988

Contact
79 N 11th St., Brooklyn, NY, NY 11249, United States
Subsidiaries
Brooklyn Brewery owns 1 brewery:
Description
The Brooklyn Brewery started with a dream to return brewing to Brooklyn, once a powerhouse of American beer production. Today our beers travel to more than half the United States and over thirty countries. Our James Beard Award-winning Brewmaster Garrett Oliver and his team brew everything from classic styles to bold experiments and collaborate with brewers, innovators and artists from around the globe. We’ve met wonderful people in remarkable places, and we can’t wait to show everyone what’s next.

In 2016, Brooklyn Brewery sold 24.5 percent to Kirin, Japan’s second-biggest brewer. The partnership allowed Brooklyn Brewery to use Kirin’s distribution arm to sell in Japan and Brazil.

     Show


7.8
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8

(vintage 2000-2001) The appearance of this beer is outstanding, like a black hole in a glass. The aroma is heavy with espresso and chocolate. The flavor is of bitter-sweet dark chocolate, with a warm rum or burbon kick at the end. This is second only to Victory Storm King Imperial Stout. Just a great beer. Get some and keep it around for special occasions. [2002-03] Yup, tastes great this year too. They’ve certainly improved on a good thing this year.[ratings from between 2006 to present] um, yea, this beer ain’t that good anymore - I mean, it’s good, but not fantastic.

Tried on 17 Oct 2002 at 18:08


8.4
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 9 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8.5

GABF 2002: Spicy and lemony aroma. Pale hazy gold color. Light, lemony and complex, with a spicy finish.

Tried on 07 Oct 2002 at 12:14


7.1
Appearance - 10 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 7.5

A pretty nice oktoberfest. I didn't like it at first, but the more sips I took, the more it grew on me. A pretty standard amber lager.

Tried on 16 Sep 2002 at 20:37


4.6
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4.5

2001 bottle. a little bit too spicy for my liking. coulda gotten away with a more traditional ale style. Decent body on it, but nothing to write home about. wouldnt drink again.

Tried from Bottle on 10 Jul 2002 at 08:59


5.8
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5

2001-2002 draft. wow this is a lot of chocolate. a bit tangy though, and i couldnt get rid of this flavor that was on the nose. it reminded me somewhat of bells porter. i think one guy said it best with ’burnt rubber’, though id imagine it is just extremely dark chocolate notes. not a huge fan, though i can appreciate the beers great body. Much rather have a young’s.
2003-2004 bottle compliments of bucknaked. Pours an inky black, dark as all get out. No sediment at the bottom, but yet I cant see through this one against the light. Perhaps it got unsettled and dissolved. Good thick black-tan head. Flavor is heavily bittersweet, flavor of huge quantities of bakers chocolate, black malt and a sweeter malt flavor. Extremely rich. I will certainly give them points for full bodied flavor, but it’s just too rich with too little variation and complexity. Couldnt even finish one of these. Oily, roasty, bitter and decadent. Perhaps better sampled in a very small quantity out of a snifter. Funny how my rating from over 2 years ago is pretty on par with what I would rate it now.
2004-2005 bottle Roastier and less sour chocolate than I remember, which seems like a good thing. Smoother than I remember, with more milk chocolate and even roast, less bitter roast and dark chocolate assault. On the down side, for an Imperial Stout, this year’s batch is very light bodied to style.
2005-2006 bottle Intensely bitter, dry, lactic and vinously fruity again, with a lacking sweetness, too much black chocolate bitter/dryness. The texture while not watery, is at best average and lightly sticky. Not creamy, or lightly thick or anywhere near that. Never understood this one.
2006-2007 draught on 11/2/06. Heavy hop acidity, biting citrus and light resin open things up, followed by the characteristic bitter, dry, nearly resinous black chocolate and tar flavor. Astringent finish, oily and unbalanced. Still, it’s very flavorful and the carbonation was nice (though I attribute that to Redbones). Too much oily/resin/tar/ashiness. Bits of alcohol harry the finish. Still don’t get this beer.

Tried from Draft on 10 Jul 2002 at 08:08


3.9
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 3.5

Bottled. Dusty and caramelly with lifeless crystal malt character half covered in piney hops. Finishes with salty cardboard. True to the original German style? Nothing could be more wrong.

Tried from Bottle on 25 Feb 2002 at 10:19


4.4
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 2.5

Nice hoppy aroma. Dry, peaty flavour. A disappointment......................

Tried on 28 Jan 2002 at 06:20


8.9
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 9 | Flavor - 9 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 9.5

Fruity, full of flavours, a bit sweet. Long aftertaste......................

Tried on 28 Jan 2002 at 06:16


8.2
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 9 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 9

Full-bodied, heavily roasted flavour of dark chocolate......................

Tried on 28 Jan 2002 at 06:13


8.3
Appearance - 10 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8

Dark black with creamy brownish head. Roasty chocolate aroma, softly malty, full bodied. Lots of salty liquorice and dark chocalte in the palate. Bitter finish. A thoroughly well made and tasty beer.

Tried on 16 Jan 2002 at 02:36