Brouwerij Hoegaarden

Commercial Brewery in Hoegaarden, Flemish Brabant, Belgium 🇧🇪
Owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev

Established in 1965

Contact
Stoopkensstraat, 24a, Hoegaarden, 3320, Belgium
Description
The last brewery in Hoegaarden, Tomsin, closed shop in 1957. Soon after, in 1965, the villagers decided to take action to preserve the original recipe. Milkman Pierre Celis decided to grasp the nettle and started brewing up a batch in his milk shed, using only a copper boiler. Because of the great success he quickly expanded his operation and moved into a bigger building – ‘De Kluis’ (The Vault) – a subtle nod to the monks. By 1985 the nod was no longer subtle as he was making more than 75.000 hectolitres per year. Just as he was about to start exporting to the United States, a large fire shattered his dreams (and the beer). The brewery was destroyed.

Since 1985, the brand has been part of Artois brewery, which provided fresh capital, after the fire. After the takeover, the recipe was changed to appeal to a wider audience and save on raw materials. The Artois brewery, which had already been absorbed into InBev (nowadays Aneuser-Busch InBev) for some time, decided in 2006 to close the brewery and move production to Jupille. On September 10, 2007, it was announced that Hoegaarden would once again be brewed in Hoegaarden. The brewery in Jupille didn't manage to imitate the typical taste of Hoegaarden...

     Show


4
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 2 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4

It seems as if this beer is some sort of sirop, in all kind of ways. This is not a beer that drinks very pleasantly.

Tried on 21 Sep 2002 at 09:21


6.5
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 7

Pale yellow, cloudy, thin collar. Strong spicy aroma (coriander) and citrus fruits. Dry taste, spicy (coriander and cloves); light malt and hop. Palate simple, not too bitter, enough spicy. Good example, but Witbiers are not my top ones.

Tried on 12 Sep 2002 at 12:58


7.1
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7.5

Judging by the United Nations of people that have rated this, Canada is the only country that doesn't get this one. Given that Interbrew is #2 in this country, that really sucks ass, because this is one of the few beers they make that's good enough to buy twice. Hell I only use the regular Hoegaarden to cook mussels. But back to the Grand Cru: light orange, cloudy; complex aroma - spice, alcohol, white pepper; the body is firm and lush at the same time, the palate is wit-like, oaty, and with good spice and firm alcohol. As "tripel-wits" go, this is far better than Don de Dieu.

Tried from Can on 24 Aug 2002 at 18:06


6.8
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 7

Decent triple style beer. Not as spicy as i like triples to be..............

Tried on 23 Aug 2002 at 03:54


6.9
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6.5

Has a nice yeasty aroma. It is cloudy from not being filteret. If poured right it has a very nice head - but most often is poured like a pilsener and then it ends up without any head. It has a nice refreshing yeast and fruit flavor. A great beer on a hot summer day for quencing your thirst.

Tried on 20 Aug 2002 at 11:19


7.6
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7.5

Perfect wheat, very fresh and most enjoyed in the summertimes, when the weather is hot.

Tried on 08 Aug 2002 at 08:12


7.6
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 7.5

Cloudy yellow color in the style of belgian wheats. Firm head, with longlasting lacing. Taste is very spicy, citrus-elements, and complex in a way it's heavy on the stomach (what's the english expression?). It's more a strong German Wheat, instead of a Belgian one. Spicy palate.

Tried on 01 Aug 2002 at 09:32


6.1
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5.5

this is a good beer. so expensive, not really worth all the money you pay. one of the strongest examples of a witbier. very spicy. tons of coriander and lemon. almost makes for a meaty taste. I think it is too strong in lemon and coriander though, and that’s about all you can taste, though it has a nice medium-full body and a grainy, wheat feel to it. My biggest complaint is that if you try to drink more than 2 of these, the flavor starts getting cloying, as hoegaarden displays plenty of that bubble gum estery sweetness. One of the better witbiers though overall. 7/4/7/3/15

Rerate Having had a fair amount of this over the years, mostly at places where this is the only decent thing on the menu, it’s still very drinkable. That seems in part due to the low abv and light nature of the beer, yet also non-filtration in a wheat beer will mask a lot of problems. Not implying this is/isn’t brewed poorly just that beers like this have a bigger margin of error than in something like a Pale lager which is going to show every little flaw in brewing. It’s very light, somewhat watery, though not any more than it should be. A bit too astringent, however, with too much coriander and orange peel. The bubble gum flavor is the highlight, as well as the carbonation. Simple, but passable, yet of course there are many better examples out there. Still, if this was the house wit bier at a random brewpub, you could do worse. 6/4/6/3/11

Tried from Can on 16 Jul 2002 at 12:36


6.5
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 8

Dull, pale yellow colur. Firm head. Yeasty citrus aroma. Refreshing citrus-flavour. Goes down very easy.

Tried on 14 Jun 2002 at 09:06


5.1
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 4 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 4.5

Deep golden colour, hazy. Fruity (apricot) aroma. Very sweet, rather malty, but just too sweet for me.

Tried on 26 May 2002 at 03:47