5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5
Id be willingto bet this is a re-label of their elora ESB. Anyways.....this is a barebones bitter. Light goldings, light pale malts, some touch of caramel, and wet paper. Meh. [br]8/13/2012: Bottle.
Clear brown pour, small white head. Aroma of toasted cereals, light nuts, and some earthy, grassy hops. Light sweetness, medium bitterness. Medium bitter finish, with a solid toasted nut that lingers.
Clear brown pour, small white head. Aroma of toasted cereals, light nuts, and some earthy, grassy hops. Light sweetness, medium bitterness. Medium bitter finish, with a solid toasted nut that lingers.
Tried
from Bottle
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:34
3.2/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 3
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
Smells like a sour Belgian wit with sour cherry extract. The flavor is much of the same. This is yet again another pitiful offering from trafalgar. Seriously why do they keep getting shelf space with the lcbo?
Tried
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:32
4/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
odd swet/sour aroma. There are some hops int here, but they are mixed with some off candied orange, and cherry. and some sweet caramel malts. Flavor is sweet, and slightly hoppy, some light citrus notes, with an odd wet hay finish. typical trafalgal offering, barely drinkable.
Tried
from Can
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:31
6.9/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 7.5
A great idea for a beer and it was one if the better beers I’ve ever had from trafalgar. A nice hop aroma, some good orange and floral notes, good malts just and overall good English pale ale.
Tried
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:29
4.8/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 5
Flavor 5
Texture 4
Overall 5
Sweet caramel malts, burnt sugar, and some wet grass. Flavor is just more of the same. Another mediocre beer.
Tried
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:29
4.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 4
Flavor 5
Texture 6
Overall 4.5
Pretty boring sweet caramel, bready malts, next to no hops andwattery finish.
Tried
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:20
6/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 6
Clear golden pour, very small head. Decent malts, hops are pretty dull, but you can taste them. As far as pale lagers go this aint hAlf bad!
Tried
from Can
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:17
1.1/10
—
Appearance 2
Aroma 1
Flavor 1
Texture 2
Overall 0.5
trafalgar strikes again!!!!!! Infected beer, sour malt, and very vinegary. Just awful, not drinkable, makes a good salad dressing.
Tried
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:16
4.1/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3.5
amber pour with a small white head. There is actually some cedar in the aroma, but it’s mixed with chear malt, and the typical nasty ale yeast flavor Trafalgar is known for. There is more cedar in the finish, along with more cheap malt. this is an odd beer. It was interesting to try, but i dont see myself having it ever again.
Tried
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:09
5.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 6
Texture 4
Overall 6
Well 1st off, I have to say I’m surprised this is drinkable and not infected! Trafalgar has a brutal rep for infected beer. Amber pour, very small white head, next to no carbonation, almost a flat beer. Aroma is very grassy, with some rye in there, i can actyually tatse it, but the grassiness dominated the aroma. The flavour definitely has some rye, i can taste it,and its pleasant, but the grassiness comes back, and dominates the finish. I’m not sure about the oak ageing......i cant tatse it at all. Decent beer, it’s drinkable, which is saying alot about the other Trafalgar beers i’ve had.
Tried
from Can
on 28 Feb 2025
at 05:08