Labatt Brewing Company

Commercial Brewery in Toronto, Ontario, Canada 🇨🇦
Owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev

Established in 1847

Contact
207 Queens Quay, Suite 299, (Labatt Breweries of Canada National Office), Toronto, M5J 1A7, Canada
Subsidiaries
Labatt Brewing Company owns 5 breweries:
Description
Labatt has deep roots in Canada stemming from its founder John Kinder. In 1847, a little more than a decade after arriving in London, Ontario from Ireland, John Kinder Labatt purchased London's Simcoe Street brewery in partnership with Samuel Eccles and by 1855 had become the brewery's sole proprietor. The brewery was later renamed John Labatt's Brewery, marking the beginning of one of Canada's largest and most successful companies.

In 1995, it was purchased by Belgian brewer Interbrew. Labatt is now part of the new company, Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev).

     Show


8.4/10 Appearance 10 Aroma 9 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 8.5
Yes Guinness. Pours a Great Back with a very nice head. This is the Beer for me. The Blacker the better.
Tried on 08 Feb 2006 at 08:20

6.6/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 6 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 6.5
Bottled. It says "Canada" on the bottle, and there’s no widget, so I think this is what I’ve had. My sampler taster is foamy. Standard Guinness black body, probably not a big enough sample to catch the Guiness "cascade." The flavor is nicely soured but offset by driness. Thin coffee notes and a nicely warming roast. Very favorable.
Tried from Bottle on 16 Jan 2006 at 08:30

1.1/10 Appearance 2 Aroma 1 Flavor 1 Texture 2 Overall 0.5
Kind of a sickly dull amber colour, like Zhigulevskoye with head stabilizers. Complex aroma of acetaldehyde and fusel alcohol alongside fresh-picked corn. The taste is harsh with alcohol, various petrochemicals, sweet adjunct and other stuff that might have blown off if this crap was lagered for more than fifteen minutes. As clean as the bums who drink it.
Tried on 08 Jan 2006 at 01:09

7.1/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 7.5
bottle - To me this beer is very much like the draught, so I won’t repeat too much. I just taste a little heavier roasted malt and a little more bitterness. The widget in the draught does give a bit better appearance and palate. Both are good beers, especially impressive for a megabrewery.
Tried from Bottle on 30 Dec 2005 at 23:04

6.8/10 Appearance 10 Aroma 5 Flavor 6 Texture 8 Overall 7
Bottle. Sour malt and molasses aroma. Dark brown opaque with moderate head that collapses quickly. A sweet and sour molasses malt flavor with moderate carbonation. Moderate body. I decided to taste this along side the draught version (can with a widget). This version has more aroma and flavor; however the main difference is the level of carbonation - the draught version is completely flat whereas this one is fairly high - if you like it with a higher carbonation, buy this version but if you like it more like when it’s pulled, get the draught. Personally I like this version better.
Tried from Bottle on 29 Dec 2005 at 18:00

4.1/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 3 Flavor 5 Texture 4 Overall 4.5
bottle - This macrobrewery pale lager is pretty good for its type. Obviously that’s not saying much at all, but I’ll take it over most other fizzy, yellow, watery beer.
Tried from Bottle on 21 Dec 2005 at 18:26

2.8/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 3 Flavor 3 Texture 2 Overall 2
Dark gold colour with creamy white head. Corny aroma with little honey in aroma. Crisp amlt and adjuncts with sweet honey finish. Tin aftertaste. This sucks. Jan. 2005.
Tried on 10 Dec 2005 at 21:29

6.6/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 6 Texture 6 Overall 6.5
This dark beer is good, but I don’t like it as much as Guinness Draught. It’s nice and thick, just like it’s brother Draught, but the creamy head is missing, as is the flavor I long for. This one’s a bit on the bitter side, not overly, but enough. It’s a drinkable beer, but not something to drink on a regular basis.
Earlier Rating: 2/2/2004 Total Score: 3.5
This dark beer is good, but I don't like it as much as Guinness Draught. It's nice and thick, just like it's brother Draught, but the creamy head is missing, as is the flavor I long for. This one's a bit on the bitter side, not overly, but enough. It's a drinkable beer, but not something to drink on a regular basis.
Tried on 10 Nov 2005 at 03:08

3.6/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 4 Flavor 4 Texture 4 Overall 2.5
I thought that this beer was alright. It was a little too dry for my tastes, but I can forgive that. A lot better than most macro brews.
Tried from Can on 03 Nov 2005 at 22:26

3.5/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 4 Flavor 2 Texture 2 Overall 4
Gold, large white head.Light antiseptic grainy nose.Dirty line taste which I don’t often get except on draft...decent body,sweet malt profile
Tried from Draft on 19 Sep 2005 at 21:52