6.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 8
Overall 7
Hazy golden color with a fully diminishing white head. Citrus aroma with a sweet almost sugary taste.
Tried
on 28 Nov 2005
at 08:14
6.4/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 6.5
Bottle at Mark’s Sour Tasting on 06/16/2010. Clear golden body with a small white head. Slight tart and fruit aroma. Dry fruit and light spice flavor. Medium body with moderate carbonation. 7/2/6/3/12 - 3.0 11/28/2005 - Hazy golden color with a thin fully diminishing white head. There’s a slightly fruity aroma. A sweet flavor with a somewhat sharp citrus bite to it. 6/3/7/3/14 - 3.3
Tried
from Bottle
on 28 Nov 2005
at 08:05
6.9/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 7
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 6.5
Bottled. Copperish red colour, reddish/white bubbly big head. Strong aroma of raspberries and cookies. Very sweet raspberry flavour.
Tried
from Bottle
on 21 Nov 2005
at 13:56
3/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 2
Flavor 3
Texture 4
Overall 3
Bottle shared with Muzzlehatch and tiggmtl on 11/6/05. Pours an amber-orange color, clear and bubbly, with a fizzly white head, no lacing either. Aroma of cheap peach candy, juicy and full of sugar. No lambic. Flavor is just all peach candy, perhaps the slightest hint of a dry, earthy malt and maybe a hint of fuzzy peach skin. No lambic. Body is medium-full of peachy sugars. Texture is lightly syrupy. Carbonation is unnatural. So the premium line denotes what now? It sure dosen’t seem to denote a higher perecentage of lambic in the beer, because this was far less lambic-like than the St Louis non-premium framboise. And you’ve got to work at being less lambic-like than the St. Louis framboise. . .
Tried
from Bottle
on 19 Nov 2005
at 21:26
5.6/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 6
Texture 4
Overall 5.5
Bottle from Auchan, Calais. Golden beer, no head. Nice fruity hoppy nose. Some syrupy sweetness is evident. Extremely carbonated and actually quite hard to swallow due to this. Golden syrup flavours in mouth and then some hop on the end which is both herby and sweet tangerine. Just a tad too strong for me.
Tried
from Bottle
on 18 Nov 2005
at 07:14
6.8/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 8
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 7
Im Glas weisen beide Biere ungefähr die Selbe Farbe auf. Im direkten Vergleich wie ich ihn vornehme, ist der Unterschied zu schmecken, durch den höheren Kirschgehalt gibt ea auch ein kräftigeres Aroma. Auch etwas süßer ist es, meiner Mainung nach an der Grenze zur Übersüßung. Gut, aber nicht so gut wie das "Normale". Test vom 15.11.2005, Gebinde: Glasflasche Noten: 11,12,12,12,12,12 - 11,90
Tried
from Bottle
on 14 Nov 2005
at 23:00
5.6/10
—
Appearance 4
Aroma 6
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 5.5
Das Peche ist süß oder besser lieblich. Aprikosengeschmack von vorn bis hinten, ein leckeres Kerlchen. Aber der Bierbezug ist halt geschmacklich kaum gegeben. Auf dem Etikett ist noch vermerkt, dass das Bier am besten bei 5°C getrunken werden soll. Die Zutaten gefallen nicht: Wasser, Malz, Weizen, Pfirsichsaft, Zucker, Hopfen, Aroman, Süßstoff, Acesulfam K, Antioxydant, Ascorbinsäure. Die Beschreibung des Bieres vom Etikett: Spontan vergorenes Bier mit Zucker uns Süßstoff. An der Zutatenliste lässt sich auch der wenige Biergeschmack erkennen, Hopfen nimmt keinen vorderen Platz ein. Test vom 14.11.2005, Gebinde: Glasflasche Noten: 10,10,10,10,12,10 - 10,10
Tried
from Bottle
on 13 Nov 2005
at 23:00
5.5/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 5
Flavor 6
Texture 6
Overall 5
Im Glas ist es dunkel, ein wenig an Rotwein erinnernd. Der Geruch ist säuerlich-chemisch. Der Johannisbeergeschmack dürfte wohl kaum überraschen, interessanter wird es im Nachgeschmack, denn genau da bestätigt sich der Geruch, säuerlich und auch leicht chemisch. Leicht bitter, das Einzige, was irgendwie auf Bier zurückschließen lässt. Schmecken tuts schon irgendwie. Test vom 14.11.2005, Gebinde: Glasflasche Noten: 9,10,8,8,14,8 - 8,70
Tried
from Bottle
on 13 Nov 2005
at 23:00
6.3/10
—
Appearance 6
Aroma 6
Flavor 7
Texture 6
Overall 6
Säuerlicher Geruch. Himbeeriger, zum Ende hin immer säuerlich werdender Geschmack. Ich empfinde es als zu süß, der Nachgeschmack fällt allerdings positiv aufgrund seines "natürlichen" Himbeer-Aromas auf. Test vom 14.11.2005, Gebinde: Glasflasche Noten: 11,9,8,13,10,10 - 10,10
Tried
from Bottle
on 13 Nov 2005
at 23:00
4.5/10
—
Appearance 8
Aroma 4
Flavor 4
Texture 4
Overall 4
Bottle, best before 1/2006, had at Sunset Grille on 10/20/2005. Well I was honestly excited to see a new bottled lambic in my area, but it turns out the hoped for lambic is really just another "lambic". So disapointing, makes me not even want to write a review. Just another unspontaneous fruit beer. How much lambic is actually in this? 5%?? Maybe? Wow. Pours a muddy-caramel-beige color, huge pinkish-yellow head is lasting. Smells of dry, root-like vegetables in the background with some sharp, almost acidic notes. But it’s dominated by sweet, thick, cloying raspberries. Well they don’t cloy in the aroma, but once you get in to the flavor, ack. Heavy raspberry fruit flavor, with more or less zero lambic quality. Some dirty yeastiness is about all I got. But at least it wasnt horribly offensive like Chapeau or Cherish, but it’s just so sad that these pretend to be lambics. Thick, sweet raspberries cloy by the end of the bottle, syrupy, fairly substantial texture. Way too sweet. Oh well, another dream shattered (not really).
Tried
from Bottle
on 21 Oct 2005
at 15:47