Samuel Adams

Commercial Brewery in Boston, Massachusetts, United States 🇺🇸
Owned by The Boston Beer Company
Associated with 4 Venues

Established in 1984

Contact
30 Germania St, Boston, MA, 02116, United States
Description
Our passion for never settling, and brewing quality, flavorful beers started with our founder, Jim Koch. He brewed the first batch of Boston Lager in his kitchen – a recipe that belonged to his great great grandfather that he found in his father’s attic back in the early 1980’s. The Boston Beer Company has grown through the years to become the fourth largest brewery in the United States.

Initially, Koch rented excess capacity and brewed the beer at the Pittsburgh Brewing Company. As sales increased Koch developed other contract arrangements at various brewing facilities with excess capacity. To reduce reliance on contract brewing Cincinnati's Hudepohl-Schoenling brewery was purchased in early 1997).

In 2007, the Boston Beer Company purchased the former F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Company brewery in Breinigsville, Pennsylvania. By 2012, the Company was producing two-thirds of all its beer at the Breinigsville facility, and it has increased brewing capacity there. The Boston Beer Company also has a small R&D brewery located in Boston (Jamaica Plain), Massachusetts, where public tours and beer tastings are offered.

     Show


6.2
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6

Deep amber colour. Hoppy aroma. hoppy and spicy (nutmeg) flavour that gets a little sweet and cloying towards the finish. Weizen Bock??

Tried on 10 Feb 2002 at 13:50


6.4
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6.5

Very distinct flavor but my least favorite of the Sammy's line, as I much prefer their seasonal fare. Nothing to really complain about though, as it is an above-average lager.

Tried on 31 Jan 2002 at 23:23


5.2
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 5

Better than average light beer. A little more flavor than is the norm for lighter fare and a much nicer color. Hint of caramel aftertaste as well. I still wouldn't classify it as a 'revolution'.

Tried on 31 Jan 2002 at 23:17


7
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6

I had visions of lemon Pledge before trying but it actually worked well on this brew. Not a favorite but I can see it being refreshing after a lawn mowing.

Tried from Can on 07 Jan 2002 at 01:39


7.2
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 6

Not very full-bodied, but flavorful with a nice spicy aftertaste. If I had to choose a seasonal beer this would be it.

Tried on 06 Jan 2002 at 19:10


9.1
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 10 | Flavor - 9 | Texture - 10 | Overall - 8.5

Dark mahogny coloured, thick with absolutely no head. Huge aroma, big fruity flavour - like fine sherry, extremely complex. Not as salty or soy-sauce like as the Triple Bock. It actually manages to stay well balanced despite it's enormous gravity.

Tried on 04 Jan 2002 at 05:41


3.6
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 3 | Texture - 2 | Overall - 2.5

I'm re-rating this because I feel that my earlier notes were too forgiving (and a rating of 3.0 was too high). If one wanted to homebrew something like this, I would advice them to mix up some molasses, soy sauce, cough syrup, brandy, maple syrup and a little vanilla extract, and that would get them close. I don't mind its unbeerness - I love the Dogfish Head World Wide Stout - this is just unpalatable. I'll have a shot at trying one after its aged about 10 years (or more). Final Note: never could understand why they called this 'Triple Bock'. Its not a bock in any sense of the word. One more time at it: a 1997 vintage sampled in 2003. The longest aged sampling I've had of it. It could surely go more, but if it isn't drinkable now, will it ever be? Dark dirty brown opaque appearance, totally still. Oily texture in the glass. Aroma is dominantly fruity (fig, raisin) and alcoholic, moderately roasted, with soy sauce. Moderately acrid, no maple in the nose. Quite pungent and complex but not pleasing. Sweetish up front, with figgy notes, overwhelming acrid coating in the mouth, some soy sauce and licorice notes (cough syrup), and burning finish. Lingering wood. Some port-like notes, but long bitterness leaves only a hint of dessert wine. I could manage to finish a 4oz serving of this, but I wouldn't enjoy it much -but at least I'll bump the numbers up a little. In the end, it needs alot of work to be a good beer - they've done much better with the Utopias.

Tried on 10 Dec 2001 at 13:43


7
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8

Rerate. Deep bronze color, medium head. Aroma is lightly caramelized. Flavor is caramel with a light hint of fruitiness and a modest hoppiness rounding out the finish. Really an altbier (and called as such by Koch), although not the most authentic version of one, but it does remind of the style at least.

Tried on 18 Nov 2001 at 16:21


6.9
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 7.5

Funny for a weizenbock: no phenols, no banana, no melanoidin, crystal clear. Lager or weizen yeast? Nevertheless, this ain't bad stuff. Moderate malt flavors and aromas greet you up front with a hint of caramel, plum, maybe bubblegum in trace amounts. Light spices trickle through, nutmeg or ginger. Balanced, with a medium finish. Residuals of spice and light hop bitterness. Acceptable amber color, but lacking a wheat beer head, instead rather thin fizzy and dissipating.

Tried on 18 Nov 2001 at 16:12


5.2
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 4 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6

Re-rating: Very mediocre pale ale and about the worst beer from SA. No depth at all - very little malt flavor, with a medium, almost metallic bitterness and little detectable hop flavor or aroma. Golden color with small head didn't do the trick either.

Tried on 18 Nov 2001 at 16:07