Liefmans

Commercial Brewery in Oudenaarde, East Flanders, Belgium 🇧🇪
Owned by Duvel Moortgat

Established in 1679

Contact
Aalststraat 200, Oudenaarde, 9700, Belgium
Description
The history of the brewery dates back to 1679. At the end of the eighteenth century, Jacobus Liefmans settled in Oudenaarde and gave the brewery its name. It was around 1900 that Liefmans started filling maturation tanks with black cherries, on a small scale. Local farmers brought their excess crops of black cherries to Liefmans and swapped them for beer. One individual who played a key part in this was Rosa Merckx. She was closely involved in the brewery’s operations over several decades. Thanks to her encouragement, the cherry beer evolved into a real success story.

     Show


8.1/10 Appearance 6 Aroma 8 Flavor 8 Texture 10 Overall 8.5
Had no idea what to expect. Bottle. Pours a deep dark brown, with tons of huge sediment floating around. Smallish off-white head. Aroma is great. Lots of cider vinegar, apples, tart cherries, raisins, some malt. Opens up sour/bitter but quickly a soy sauce flavore, but sweeter, comes out. Has a nice medium body, slightly grainy and bubbly. Lots of brown sugar sweetness, with lots of vinegar taste, though not as sharp and acidic. Has a wonderful balance, finishes with a lovely touch of hops and yeast. Lingering bitter sweet flavor. Like a nice gueuze with some agnostura bitters and some cider in it. Manages to be very tart, yet has a big sweet flavor.
Tried from Bottle on 05 Oct 2003 at 19:29

7.2/10 Appearance 10 Aroma 5 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 8
Very nice head when pourred into glass, almost creamy, did not disapear and left line in the glass; to me this is a very impressive start. Very refreshing taste with a fruity aftertaste (Leifman knows how to add fruity taste to their beer). I'm not sure this a pale ale per say but it is still a good beer.
Tried on 01 Oct 2003 at 11:42

7.1/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 6.5
Dark amber/brown in colour with a fairly thin tan head that subsides quickly. Smells of sour cherries, malt, tart cranberries and a bit of citrus! Medium-Bodied; Tastes initially of malt and a bit of hops with a subtle sourness. Quickly morphs flavour to very sour cherrys, a residual sweetness (from the fruit) and a subtle maltiness. Aftertaste a bit spicey, a bit sour and a bit sweet...quite literally a perfect combination for the style. A pretty good beer, and while not my favourite flemish sour, still very good when compared to other beers! Worth trying, especially if you can regularly find it! I got this 75 cL bottle from fellow ratebeerian and great friend Jon (JonR888710) which he purchased at Lee & Edwards in Roanoke, Virginia and sampled it on 31-August-2003.
Tried from Can on 04 Sep 2003 at 21:13

7.3/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 6 Texture 8 Overall 7
Dark brown with clear red shine; thick creamy head with pinkish shine, dissipating. Nose of cherry (ever so slightly syrupy), wood, woodstripper, vinous. Taste of cherygums, syrupy; woody undertones; very, very slightly bitterish-tart. Medium-bodied, refreshing. Acids, bit of vinous alcohol. If only this cherry-chewing gum flavour could be more palatable - this would be quite good still. Go search for the draught unsweetened version.
Tried on 06 Aug 2003 at 12:08

7.8/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 8 Texture 6 Overall 8
Drank it fridge-cool, as I did with its Canadian effigy. Very diffuse head, white with pink-brownish glaze; brown beer with reddish shine, very hazy. Vinous nose, estery, spicy (cloves, cinnamon, cardemoms, ginger), but also something reminscent of cola. Vinous and spicy taste, here the cinnamon and cloves overwhelm the rest. There is a metallic acidity retronasal. Bitterish surrounding, and, of course, cherry aroma all over, but it is a natural-appearing aroma. Good. Acidity even develops some acidburn. Strange. Liefmans is the original, but I've liked the Unibroue better from the moment I tasted it - despite it being sweeter. Both the Liefmans as the Quelque Chose seem to benefit from the cooling - something I never did before with this.
Tried from Can on 05 Aug 2003 at 12:22

8.4/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 8 Flavor 9 Texture 8 Overall 8.5
1997, 6 years old, bottle conditioned
Cold. Red-amber color, no head, flat. Very nice cherry aroma, light spices, Porto wine. Less sweet and sirupy than Quelque Chose, very good character, pleasant fruit sourness, wood. Final well balanced between the bitterness, sweetness, the fruits and the spices. Perfect maturation.
Hot. Interesting aroma: cherries, spices, cinchona. It looses the acidity, being less interesting than colder (but still better than Quelque Chose, more character; acidity developing more in the final.

Other Gluhbeers:
Quelque Chose
La Dragonne
Tried from Bottle on 28 Jul 2003 at 08:30

7.1/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 7 Texture 6 Overall 7.5
The aroma is dominated by cherries with a little sharpness and good portion of sweetness. The color is deep red but it has no head. The flavor is rather sweet with a strong cherry presence and a slight sourness. It ends on a dry cherry note. A good beer - but not the best Kriek I've had.
Tried on 16 Jul 2003 at 10:51

3.4/10 Appearance 4 Aroma 4 Flavor 3 Texture 4 Overall 2.5
Very dark (red) colour. Little bit brownish head. Not a strong aroma at all, little bit sour. This beer drinks well, especially at this moment when I'm quite thirsty, maybe that's the reason why I can't perceive any particular flavours. Little bit sour maybe.
Tried from Can on 14 Jul 2003 at 17:25

7.5/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 7 Texture 8 Overall 8
Vertical tasting between: A; Liefmans Goudenband (375 ml), cork date: 12/2002, points as above; and: B; Liefmans Goudenband (750ml), cork date: 1986, points in [brackets] in text. Colour: A: thick yellow head, dense, lacey; deep brown beer with reddish shine. B: thick dirty yellow head, cringing to a 1 cm thick ring; dark brown, amberish shine [4]. Nose: A: acetone, nuts, Maillard/bread crust, wood; B: earthy, lactic, Rodenbach-like, mushrooms [8] Taste: A: really like a burnt crust of a pretty sweet bread (eggbread and the like). Surrounding sourness (lactic-woody) with always a bitter finish: a bit harsh, not hoppy, licorice; B: Sourish, pretty lactic, acetic is hinted at but below identification treshold. Yet something clear-sweet inside. Very little tartness, more sour-sweet, but lots of fruity, wooden notes. Vague hint of old port, with the suspicion of the Stilton served alongside. When compared to A, A becomes a pale abbey dubbel, even like a German brown beer, and this is the real thing [9] Mouthfeel/aftertaste: A: Full-bodied, but thinner texture. Shame about the finish, the beer is quite OK; B: much more refreshing, lesser bodied but it somehow sits more right with the style. Or is that prejudice? [5] Overall: A is nice and would come out best when drunk as such. In this vertical test, however, it completely fades in front of the 1986 onslaught. One that tastes as if it were brewed last december for a surviving bunch of real Flemish 'potentaten' with flat caps, a mean eye, and a no meaner stomach. Truly great: [18], which would give it 4.4 out of 5!
Tried on 07 Jul 2003 at 12:47

7.6/10 Appearance 8 Aroma 7 Flavor 8 Texture 8 Overall 7.5
This seems like the perfect match between champagne, beer and raspberry juice. Good sour taste and very refreshing for those hot summer days
Tried on 07 Jul 2003 at 09:38