Brouwerij Smisje

Microbrewery in Mater, East Flanders, Belgium 🇧🇪
Associated Venue: Smisje

Established in 2009

Contact
Driesleutelstraat 1, Mater, 9700, Belgium
Description
De brouwerij werd opgericht in 1995 door Johan Brandt en was tot 2008 gelegen in het West-Vlaamse Assebroek, een deelgemeente van de stad Brugge. Voornamelijk omwille van het gebrek aan de nodige ruimte voor uitbreiding (de brouwcapaciteit bleef beperkt tot 320 liter per brouwsel), verhuisde de brouwerij in 2009 naar Mater, een deelgemeente van Oudenaarde. Deze verhuis bracht ook de officiële naamsverandering van De Regenboog naar Smisje met zich mee. In 2010 werd beslist alle bestaande bieren behalve het Kerstbier te doen verdwijnen uit het assortiment en het nieuwe bier Smiske te lanceren. De oudere Smisje-bieren werden echter zo gewaardeerd dat een aantal mensen een Facebook-groep opzette om de bieren toch nog te laten brouwen. Op aanvraag van de regelmatige bezoekers besluit in 2011 de brouwer ook Smiske Bruin te brouwen.

     Show


6
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5

AOBF 04. 2003 Bottle. Medium dark brown with some light cherry reds and duller browns. Small off-white head. Aroma was not terribly interesting, somewhat dry spices (whatever it is, it adds too much astringency) and some light caramel notes. Flavor is dry, lightly toasty and astringent. Body is only medium and the big belgian yeast character I’m looking for never really comes out. Some light hints of dark fruit and a dry, almost bitter finish with some mildly pervasive alcohol. Not terribly impressed. Sweetness only seemed moderate at best. Mouthfeel is pretty flat and uninteresting.

Tried from Bottle on 12 May 2004 at 10:30


5.8
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 6

Fully hazy (end of bottle is pure yeast) orange-gold; no head. Citric nose, lemonbalm, slightly lactic, something vaguely medicinal. Spritzy acidic, overlying a very spicey-medicinal taste (mannah? paradise seed?) - not quite sweet, faint orange peel. Bit musty. Light, spritzy mouthfeel. Refreshing notes from the acidity are counteracted by the rather dull-musty medicinal flavours. I’ll never dig the witbier style. This one’s uncharacteristic (it’s Regenboog after all!), but it still isn’t my cuppa tea.

Tried from Bottle on 09 May 2004 at 14:52


5.5
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 5 | Flavor - 5 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 5

Copper color; poor head. Strange aroma: light sourness, earth, common grass, light mustard. Common ale, a bit harsh. I can't see the point…

Tried from Can on 09 Mar 2004 at 04:34


6.1
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 5.5

Clear, amber body. Off-white, fizzy head. Mostly diminishing, good lacing. Lightly hoppy (citrus) and lightly yeasty (aerth) aroma. LIghtly bitter initial flavour. Moderately bitter, moderately sour (long) finish. Watery and lively mouthfeel.

Tried on 07 Mar 2004 at 14:27


7
Appearance - 6 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 7

This Belgian Strong reminded me of an English Old Ale. Poured a dirty copper-brown, with abundant yeast sediment. No head. Bourbon, a touch of apple peel, and vinous notes characterize the aroma. Flavor of bourbon and wood, muting the vinous, slightly fruity character of the underlying malts. Alcohol is strong and warming. This beer was also flat. Interesting and tasty despite its flaws.

Tried on 30 Dec 2003 at 12:11


5.5
Appearance - 2 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 6

Muddy dull brown - looks dreadful in the glass. No hiss upon opening and no carbo visible. Aroma has apple, alcohol and rich malts - caramel and concentrated amounts of pale malt. Flat body, but alcohol arrives quickly and forcefully to minimize oiliness. Of course, this is merely replaced by heat. It carries alongside it an apple accent as well as slightly caramelized pears and peaches. Strongly alcoholic finish. I find the overall product too hot and the beer component too one-dimensional (read: dominated by the calvados). Decent at best.

Tried on 24 Dec 2003 at 23:49


7.4
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 7 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 7.5

Cloudy colored but in the good way, not cloudy like a Bud. This is probably the most distinct belgian white I have ever tried, definitly worth a try by any beer lover. It has a strong citric kick. I wouldn’t drink this on a regular basis but I do recommend everyone to try it. Rerate 5/5/06 - oh boy, I compared this to a bud. Well this is definitly more sour than I mentioned. Liek citrus mixed with sourness. Medium nobody, feel that sourness for a while. I am lowering my rating just a bit.

Tried on 20 Dec 2003 at 14:29


5.2
Appearance - 4 | Aroma - 6 | Flavor - 6 | Texture - 4 | Overall - 5

Hazy brown coloured with ugly red highlights. No head at all, even with a quite vigourous pour! Aroma of plums, raisins, cranberries, malt, earth and alcohol. Medium-bodied; Still; Sweet, musty, mushroomy maltiness, mixed with some oak tannins and the ever present alcoholic burn. Aftertaste was fairly lacking, only a bit of the caster sugar sweetness comes out, and the malt bitterness lasts for an unpleasurable amount of time. Overall, this one needs some time, I guess? Perhaps it will get some carbonation, but the pour doesn't show too much sediment, so all with this batch might be screwed? I bought this 33 cL bottle at Premier Gourmet in Buffalo, New York and sampled it on 08.December.2003.

Tried from Bottle on 08 Dec 2003 at 22:12


8.4
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 8 | Flavor - 9 | Texture - 8 | Overall - 8.5

Cloudy amber color. Strong malt aroma, Barley Wine style. Strong mouthfeel, sweet in the front, strong character: a lot of malt, caramel, light liquorice, hop, some spices. Ends very bitter and quite long. Very well brewed, quite hiding the alcohol, incredible strong flavor.

Tried on 08 Dec 2003 at 06:33


7.5
Appearance - 8 | Aroma - 7 | Flavor - 8 | Texture - 6 | Overall - 8

I like this beer it is distinct yet not disgusting like fisher for example. One does taste a hint of mustard seed at the end and i liked it.

Tried on 26 Sep 2003 at 21:28